Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
FMSynthesis · Frequency Modulation! FM Synthesis!
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
PM Versus FM (The Integral Enigma)   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #752 of 1199 |
Re: [FMSynthesis] PM Versus FM (The Integral Enigma)

> I don't know calculus, yet, so if anyone offer advice in layman's terms I
would greatly
> appreciate it.

I'll give it a try:

The tone produced is a function of a variable in time. As time progresses the
voltage swings back and forth between a positive and a negative value. We
hear this as a note.

When you affect the time variable we hear a change in pitch. If the time
variable progresses faster we hear a higher pitch, if it progresses slower a
lower pitch.

The difference between PM and FM has to do with what we do to the time
variable. Suppose you add another sinewave to the time variable. Then you
alternately fastens and slows down the time variable. This is the sound of a
vibrato. The other sinewave could be an LFO, but also a true audio frequency.

If you add a constant value to the time variable you will get a phase shift
and not a pitch shift, because the added constant means that you are
constantly "ahead of time".

If you add the integral of a function to the time variable, you really add
the area below the funtion to the time variable, which is another function.
So you add a function to the time variable.

If the function before making an integral happens to be a sine wave balanced
around 0, then the integral funtion will swing equally on boths sides of 0
and the net effect is that the original tone has the same frequency.
Furthermore the integral of a sine wave is another sine wave, pitch shifted.

However, suppose the sine wave to be integrated is not perfectly balanced
around 0. This is what a DC-offset is all about. Then the integral of that
function will be a function that accumulates the area, instead of swingin
back and forth between 0. So in time the value will increase and increase.
Since we add this value to the original time variable, the net effect is that
the total time variable for the outer sine wave moves ahead through time too
fast. This we hear as a permanent change in pitch!

This does not happen in PM where you just add a sine directly to the time
variable, because if the inner sine is not balanced the net result is like
adding a constant - and this only produces a phase shift, but still has the
same pitch.

In fact you can't really change the pitch in PM, unless you add a non-
harmonic function instead of the sine. In FM you can change the pitch.

In analog systems it is really difficult to make a perfectly balanced
harmonic function. If the second funtion isn't even a sine wave, the areas
above and below zero are likely not to be the same. Just think of a 90% PW
square. Most of the wave will be above 0, if the DC-offset is not adjusted.

On a MiniMoog, try to modulate OSC1 with OSC3 and bring OSC3 into the audio
range. Then you can clearly hear how the different OSC 3 waveforms change the
pitch of OSC1.

This is at least an attempt to explain in common words. Somebody (preferably
an engineer) correct me if this is totally wrong.





Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:50 am

frankcarvalho
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #752 of 1199 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello, This is my first post here, so let me start off by saying, thank you for exisisting! I look forward to some great exchanges with the list. I am a synth...
Andrew Mylko
andrewmylko
Offline Send Email
Oct 26, 2006
9:23 pm

Hi Andy, well, PM isn't reacting on DC-Offset, while FM does with pitch shifts, unless you decouple it. I think that's the most important difference from the...
Summa
flotorian
Offline Send Email
Oct 26, 2006
10:31 pm

... Hello Summa, thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I don't know what DC-Offset or decoupling is. Not that far yet! I will try looking them up... if you can...
Andrew Mylko
andrewmylko
Offline Send Email
Oct 26, 2006
11:00 pm

DC = Direct Currency... a constant value above or below the X-Axis... ... -- CZ/VZ mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth FMHeaven mailing list...
Summa
flotorian
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2006
12:38 am

... I'm a newb... but not that much of a newb! or Maybe I am that much of a newb... I don't know... :-) I have built a simple fm synth with Reaktor using a...
Andrew Mylko
andrewmylko
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2006
6:18 am

... would greatly ... I'll give it a try: The tone produced is a function of a variable in time. As time progresses the voltage swings back and forth between a...
dko4342@...
frankcarvalho
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2006
9:53 am

Hello All, There's a lot of good info in response to this thread, so it's going to take me some time to rightly digest and respond to it. In the meatime, I...
Andrew Mylko
andrewmylko
Offline Send Email
Oct 28, 2006
9:09 am

Is this list tied to the ampex list somehow? I started getting these emails as soon as I signed up to this list http://recordist.com/ampex/...
blixton
sumbitch212
Offline Send Email
Oct 27, 2006
4:51 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help