I just made some comparisons based on your bass drum WAV files.

In a first test I have sent the 0DB and -4DB WAV file via MIDI DUMP to the Emax,
using Alchemy on Mac.
--> Result: there is no distortion in the samples on Emax, but imho the result
doesn't sound at all like the original WAVs. The samples on the Emax have quite
a low volume (no real problem) but also some annoying high pitch in them and
they sound dull.

In a second test I have created an Emax bank with EMXP.
--> Result: there is a clear distortion on the 0DB sample, but the -4DB sample
sounds very good and is almost identical to the original WAV file (or to the
EMAX-II version of this sample).

Of course the distortion of the first sample is not OK, so I will check EMXP's
conversion algorithm. It's clearly a problem of amplitude level because the
distortion is caused by clipping. So I'll have to check the normalization level
in my algorithm.

Maybe I will include an updated version of this algorithm in the next EMXP v2.07
(aka the "SoundFont2 release") which I hope to launch as a BETA version within
the next 2 weeks.

///E-Synthesist

--- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "bermudaben2006" <bermudaben2006@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone ever compared the sound quality of EMXP and midi dump? As I said
earlier, I think sound quality of files converted with EMXP is perfectly ok if
you leave enough headroom before conversion. I have never used Midi dump though.
>
>
>
> --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "jammie" <jammie.emma@> wrote:
> >
> > the best way to get a good quality sound into the emax is through midi
sample dump i use dissidants sample wrench as it works with all the old samplers
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chip
> > To: emax@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:13 AM
> > Subject: [emax] Re: Converting wav files to Emax samples using EMXP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > another significat factor is the AD 12 bit conversor
> >
> > sometimes you get better results sampling a sound directly to emax's
sample input using a decent preamp.
> >
> > --- In emax@yahoogroups.com, "Rei" <vjrei@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The answer is very simple...
> > >
> > > Algoritms. Emu software is meant to work with Emu hardware. Is like when
you buy an iPod or any other music device, if you use some other kind of
headphones the sound is gonna be way different, usually bad.
> > >
> > > The OS of each Emu sampler is calibrated for its own hardware, if you
import an audio file only with the correct sample rate that doesn't mean
anything, you are missing the antialiasing filter, that is the one that gives
the texture and the quality to the actual sample other than the samplerate.
> > >
> > > EMXP is only downgrading the sample rate but is not resampli with
antialiasing/EQ or compression. That is what gives Emu its sound, they really
did an amazing job suking the sounds out of the technology back then.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>