Hi,

I remember being puzzled by this at the time but quite liked it. The moment
I realised the lyrics to Others were on the CAught in flux sleeve was one
of the greatest 'eyeless moments'. It is still just about my favourite early
eyeless track (followed by No Noise) and it only really became that when
I knew what the lyrics were.
Not sure about the concept idea - were the photographs on the cover taken
in the 50's floods in England I wonder?

Graeme

>-- Original Message --
>To: <eyeless@yahoogroups.com>
>From: "Harrekki" <Harrekki@...>
>Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:48:10 -0500
>Subject: [eyeless] Caught in Flux
>Reply-To: eyeless@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>Hi all,
>
> I recently picked up a copy of Caught in Flux on vinyl and am a little
>puzzled. 'Eyes of Beautiful Losers' is denoted as record one: I always
thought
>it was like a b-side to the proper album, but here it's presented as an
intro.
> Which is the right order, or does it even matter? (how conceptual is Caught
>in Flux being the underlying question). It's also kind of strange the
way
>the lyrics to 'Others' is on the sleeves, but that single came out around
>the same time I think...Eyeless had the Joy Division mentality of keeping
>singles seperate from the LP in the early days, it seems.
>
>Later,
>
>Dave


__________________________________________________________________
Win 12 amazing weekend breaks, one every month for a year to Dublin, Milan,
the Alps, Paris and beyond

http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/competitions/brilliant_weekends.html