I started distributing the following message on the internet
yesterday...


I've included below the contents of the first version of a document I
finished writing yesterday. I produced 400 copies (2 sheets of A4
double sided) to bring to Glasgow for a Scottish TUC demo against
racism and fascism tomorrow (Sat 27 Nov, St Andrews Square, assemble
10.30am) and a John Maclean March the day after (Sun 28 Nov, assemble
Eastwood Cemetery, Thornliebank Road, by Thornliebank Station,
assemble 12 noon).

The anti-racism demo is very timely considering the racist
chanting/gestures in football matches recently, and it could be very
big. There is even a "Show Racism the Red Card" poster advertising
the event in the hostel that I am staying in. I had hoped to make the
document longer, but I didn't have time. I particularly wanted to
include material on racism (although the document does include
material which I have taken from an earlier leaflet on inflitration
by fascist organisations, there is more that I could say on racism
and fascism) and on freedom for Palestine which is an issue I have
been taking up in Manchester. The Israel/Palestine conflict is also
particularly topical, after the recent murder of a 13-year old
Palestinian schoolgirl by Israeli troops, and the re-arrest for a
brief period of time of Mordechai Vanunu (on the day Yasser Arafat
died so that it wouldn't feature as much in the news) who was a
whistleblower about Israel's secret nuclear weapons programme in 1986
and was released earlier this year but is being prevented from
leaving Israel. I have arranged to do some printing on Tuesday
afternoon, which will give me time to compose the text for two more
pages. I will of course distribute that additional material on the
internet as well. If you haven't received it by Wednesday, it is
probably because I'll be restricting the internet distribution to the
more relevant discussion groups. I put nearly all my material on the
Manchester International Socialist Movement group, so you will be
able to find it at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/manchesterism.

I realised this morning that I may have been too prescriptive when I
said that the author of the http://www.oilempire.us website (his name
is Mark) `does not seem to have considered the possibility that Kerry
is an infiltrator from a conspiratorial organisation on the side of
the working class'. It is also possible that Kerry has been acting
alone on the side of the working class all along, or that he has
switched from the side of big business to the side of the working
class fairly recently under the pressure of world events and
progressive elements within the Democratic Party (with or without
being recruited by a conspiratorial organisation on the side of the
working class). However, it seems unlikely that conspiratorial
organisations on the side of the working class operating within the
USA would have relied on Kerry if he was not one of their own, when
they could have maneouvred somebody more reliable into a position of
such power and influence as Presidential candidate instead. I will
clarify these points in version 2 of this document. On the page,
http://www.oilempire.us/kerry.html, Mark says: `In early 2003, this
website predicted "If Senator Kerry is picked as the Democratic
candidate at the 2004 Convention in Boston, then the Presidential
selection will be a contest between the liberal and conservative
wings of the Skull and Bones Society!"' – the fact that he says there
are two wings of that right-wing conspiratorial organisation
indicates that he probably agrees with me, in his subconscious at
least! I am sending this message to Mark (and will add his email
address to my usual list of email addresses I send my most important
messages out to unless he indicates otherwise).



The worldwide struggle for democracy and socialism

by Steve Wallis (http://www.stevewallis.org), Manchester
International Socialist Movement
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/manchesterism), 25 November 2004

Bush and Blair would like you to believe that they are on the side
of `freedom' and `democracy' in the struggle against `terrorism'
and `dictatorships'. The freedom that they are in favour of is the
freedom of the big companies to exploit working class people around
the globe, and their parties carry out acts which erode our freedoms
and democratic rights at the same time. They say they are bringing
democracy to Iraq when they have come to power via extremely
undemocratic electoral systems (and Bush defrauded Kerry as I explain
below). Additionally, they keep going on about the threat
of `terrorism' while their armies carry out terrorist acts, often
against innocent civilians, in Iraq.

After the collapse of Stalinism in the USSR and Eastern Europe,
nearly every country in the world is run by a party of big business.
The West needed a new `enemy', to try to prevent the working class
from working out that the key struggle across the world is between
capitalism and socialism – and the new `enemy' they found is `Islamic
fundamentalism'. It needed a big event for the propaganda to be
effective, so they allowed 9/11 to happen (evidence exists, including
insider trading, that it was known about in advance – see
http://www.oilempire.us/911.html or http://www.911truth.org).

It is important that socialists are always in favour of democracy, in
a particular country at a particular time in history, even if Western
leaders are calling for democracy at the same time (such as during
the `Orange Revolution' that is taking place in Ukraine, or in Iraq,
at the time I write this article). This is for two reasons. Firstly,
greater degrees of democracy generally provide more opportunities for
the working class to take power or at least influence events.
Secondly, we need to consider our reputation.

In Russia in 1917, there were two revolutions. After the February
revolution, a capitalist Provisional Government came to power which
would not grant any form of elections. As well as campaigning
for `bread, peace and land', the Bolsheviks (who later became known
as the Communist Party) campaigned for a Constituent Assembly.
However, because Russia was largely a peasant country, the Bolsheviks
lost the elections after they came to power in October to the right-
wing Social Revolutionaries (SRs) based on the large landowners.
Lenin and Trotsky, who had led the October revolution, persuaded the
Bolsheviks to abolish the Constituent Assembly (by force). They
argued that there would have been massive repression of the
Bolsheviks if they let the right-wing SRs take power, but surely the
working class would have been able to defend them in a country which
had had two revolutions in the same year! The result has been 87
years in which `socialists' and `communists' have often been regarded
as `undemocratic'. Lenin and Trotsky were both agents of big business
who had infiltrated the Bolsheviks – this opinion of mine is also
based on the repression that they later carried out and the fact that
Trotsky was allowed to operate in capitalist Mexico until he was
murdered by an agent of Stalin in 1940. Even today, in every edition
of Socialist Worker, the newspaper of the Socialist Workers Party
(SWP) and Socialist Worker platform of the Scottish Socialist Party
(SSP), the `What the SWP stands for' column includes the text `The
working class needs an entirely different kind of state – a workers'
state based upon councils of workers' delegates and a workers'
militia.' The `councils of workers' delegates' were known
as `soviets' in Russia and the hierarchical structure they had
enabled Stalin to come to power. In this day and age, it is obvious
that proportional representation (PR) is a much fairer form of
election than either soviets or constituencies, and PR has been
instrumental in enabling the SSP to get six Members of the Scottish
Parliament (MSPs) elected. Furthermore, voters should be allowed to
indicate preferences, instead of being put in a position where many
vote tactically; if that was allowed then the SSP would have even
more MSPs. In passing, it is worth noting that using the phrase `a
workers' militia' is surely designed to put people off – after
atrocities such as in Dunblane, guns are hated so much in Britain
that many workers seeing such a phrase would think `If that's what
you mean by socialism, then I'd prefer capitalism thank you very
much.' In my opinion, this is evidence that the leadership of the SWP
is dominated by agents of big business.


US electoral fraud – Kerry won!

There was a lot of evidence of electoral fraud in the Presidential
elections four years ago. For example, many black people got turned
away from polling stations on the false basis that they had criminal
records (which of course should not prevent people from voting for
the rest of their lives). There was also the `hanging chads' fiasco,
where somebody's vote didn't count if the voting machine
malfunctioned (with the Republicans preventing a manual recount using
the courts, although I have read that the Democrat-controlled Senate
could have overruled the Supreme Court).

The `solution' to the `hanging chads' problem was to provide other
forms of computer, usually with touch-screens. This amplifies the
problems of fraud since there is no paper trail which could enable a
full recount to take place. The main suppliers of the voting machines
have strong links with the Republican Party. Walden O'Dell, chief
executive of Diebold Inc., wrote in a letter to Republicans (on the
14th of August 2003) that he was `committed to helping Ohio deliver
its electoral votes to the President'. Lo and behold, Diebold's
voting machines were used in the election, and they certainly played
a role in handing the election to Bush.

The evidence that Kerry was defrauded in Ohio and Florida (and in
enough other states which would have meant that he would have
received more votes overall than Bush) includes:

· Exit polls in Ohio and Florida, and in a few other `swing
states' which were also eventually called for Bush, showed Kerry
winning (to a much greater extent that can be argued was due to
margin of error). Exit polls are used internationally to verify
whether election results are accurate (e.g. in the recent Ukrainian
Presidential election which the Republicans hypocritically say was a
fraud).
· Early poll results showed Kerry in the lead in both Ohio
and Florida, yet Bush supporters supposedly voted later in the day!
· In some areas of Ohio, more votes were counted than the
number of people on the electoral roll.
· In many areas, there were high numbers of people who were
registered Democrats but who supposedly voted for Bush.
· Some voters noticed the touch-screen voting machines
behaving strangely, e.g. selecting `back' and finding a different
selection (particularly Bush) from the one that they had chosen.
· The machines were easy to hack.
· Smaller numbers of voting machines were supplied in areas
where voters are likely to vote Democrat than Republican, leading to
queues of about ten hours (and many giving up)!
· Republican officials often challenged voters based on the
colour of their skin before they voted, so their votes only counted
as `provisional'.

The reason why this election was particularly important was that
Kerry had pointed out that Bush had granted 85 or 90 billion dollars
of tax cuts to people earning over $200,000 per year, and he promised
to take that tax cut back. In other words, Kerry promised to tax the
rich. It was also very significant that Kerry also pledged to close
all tax loopholes. Kerry deliberately waited until the second live TV
debate with Bush – which was his first opportunity to say what he
really thought without being censored by the multinational-controlled
mass media (and in which he received questions from the audience
rather than a representative of big business like in the first
debate). Before that, he had played one faction off against another,
in order to get into the situation where he was competing to be
President – hence the `flip-flops' that Bush concentrated on
criticising him for.

On the environment, Bush justified refusing to sign up to the Kyoto
agreement on the basis that it would cost 1.3 million jobs in the
USA. However, Kerry pointed out later in the debate that Bush had
granted tax incentives for countries investing outside the USA,
causing mass unemployment at home.

That election was not simply a case of two big business parties
competing with each other, because Kerry was much more radical than
his advisers. In fact, in my opinion, Kerry is a revolutionary
socialist in disguise! I've just come across a website (at
http://www.oilempire.us) which contains a lot of useful information
about US electoral fraud from a radical perspective, plus other
important information such as about 9/11. However, the author fails
to mention anything about Kerry's radical economic programme,
probably because that would contradict his hypothesis that Bush and
Kerry were on the same side. His evidence for that, apart from a lot
of right-wing views that Kerry had expressed in the past (and which
were in order to climb the greasy pole in my opinion) was that they
are both in a very secret and influential conspiratorial organisation
called `Skull and Bones', which has got many of its members in
positions of great power including three US Presidents. He does not
seem to have considered the possibility that Kerry is an infiltrator
from a conspiratorial organisation on the side of the working class
within both the Democratic Party and `Skull and Bones'. Nevertheless,
it seems that Kerry's membership of `Skull and Bones' forced him to
concede the election – but his concession does not have any legal
effect so the result can still be challenged. In fact, the Green
Party and Libertarian Party are in fact forcing a recount in Ohio,
which may overturn the result (but of course it can only be a partial
recount because there are no paper records for many votes).

Although the Democrats in the USA used to simply be a party of big
business, like the Tories and Liberal Democrats (and now Labour) in
Britain, there are now serious left-wing forces within the US
Democratic Party. The Progressive Democrats of America even urged
their members to support http://www.911truth.org. In my opinion,
Marxists in the USA, who are scattered in tiny organisations, should
use the method of `entrism' (i.e. infiltration) as practiced by the
Militant Tendency in the British Labour Party in the past.

I have set up an internet discussion group (at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/us-electoral-fraud) to discuss
electoral fraud in the US Presidential election and what can be done
about it. I suggest left-wing activists set up an organisation
demanding real democracy in the USA, most importantly abolishing the
Electoral College in favour of a fair form of proportional
representation.


Democracy not stooges in Iraq

The 28th of June `handover' has only replaced one set of stooges for
imperialism with another. These puppets have already handed over many
of Iraq's assets to Western companies. Western leaders and their
stooges are extremely unpopular in Iraq, particularly amongst the
majority Muslim population. The US's vastly superior firepower on the
ground and bombs from the air have meant that their assault on
Fallujah killed many insurgents, as well as many more civilians, with
a very small number of US casualties. The brutality of US soldiers
has undoubtedly meant that many Muslims are sympathetic to the
insurgents.

The West and their puppets in Iraq promise elections on the 30th of
January. There is no chance of elections in Iraq being free and fair
while the occupation continues for a number of reasons:

· Most importantly, before the `handover', the former US
administrator Paul Bremer rushed through a law giving a seven-member
commission the power to disqualify parties and candidates. It would
particularly aim to ban any radical left-wing party that tries to
stand in the election, which promises to seize assets back stolen by
the West (particularly the oil industry). Banning such a party would
risk mass demonstrations, so the commission would probably attempt to
ban it before it became particularly large.
· Some insurgents are threatening to kill anybody who
attempts to vote.
· Any electoral system advocated by the West or their stooges
is bound to be undemocratic.

It is quite likely that the West and their stooges will use continued
unrest as an excuse for postponing elections indefinitely. Whatever
happens, socialists should support electionsin Iraq (and demand they
are as democratic as possible) and oppose both the West and right-
wing Muslims like Muqtada al-Sadr (who are unfortunately supported by
the SWP).


Internet discussion of politics and music

If you go to http://www.yahoogroups.com, you can find some great
internet discussion groups. Here are some of mine that you might like
to check out – revolutionary-anti-war (Oppose war, sanctions and
dictatorships), iraq-democracy, anti-id-cards, fair-pr, strictly-
declarative-modelling-language and galaxiamusic (which is about a
revolutionary socialist band I will form).

Go to Google Groups and check out rec.music.gaffa. This newsgroup is
for fans of Kate Bush and similar kinds of music. You can join a
linked "love hounds" mailing list which enables you to send messages
to the newsgroup and avoid the heavy censorship of other music
newsgroups.


Campaign for Democracy in the UK

We demand:

· A fair form of Proportional Representation in all elections
to Westminster, the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly, councils
throughout the UK, and to the European Parliament. Voters must have
the right to indicate preferences, so that they can write "1" on the
ballot paper for their preferred candidate, "2" for second best. Many
working class people and youths are disillusioned with politics
because they realise that New Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the
Tories are all parties of big business. Let those people demonstrate
their hostility at the ballot box by placing them last if they want
to, enabling new people and parties to come to the fore.
· The reduction of the right to vote and stand for election
to the age of 16.
· The extension of the right to vote and stand for election
to all people resident in the UK, irrespective of their nationality.
· The extension of the right to vote and stand for election
to people in prison. Tommy Sheridan, the leader of the Scottish Anti-
Poll Tax Federation, went to jail for six months for defying a court
order banning him from protesting in a particular area of Glasgow. He
stood as a candidate of the revolutionary socialist organisation
Scottish Militant Labour in the 1992 general election while still in
prison and got over 6,000 votes coming second to Labour in the
poverty-striken Pollok constituency of Glasgow. He stood again, while
still in prison, in the council elections and got elected to Glasgow
Pollok ward. Election law has consequently been changed to prevent
anybody This was the springboard for the establishment of the
Scottish Socialist Alliance, uniting organisations and individual
socialists from different traditions in campaigns (most notably
against the building of a motorway extension in Pollok, which
established Rosie Kane as a serious environmental campaigner, and
elections). The alliance transformed itself into the Scottish
Socialist Party (SSP), just in time for Tommy to become the sole SSP
member of the Scottish Parliament when it opened. The SSP and now
Tommy Sheridan and Rosie Kane are members of the Scottish Parliament
in Glasgow. Rosie is particularly respected for her act of defiance
when she was forced to swear an oath of allegiance to the Queen of
England in order to sit in the Scottish Parliament – she attended in
jeans, as she has continued to do, and held her hand aloft with the
words "My oath is to the people" written on it (and she also showed
she has a brilliant sense of humour by saying "to her hairs and
successors", rather than "heirs"). I saw her do this, watching BBC1
(at a fairly early hour so not too many people in the British Isles
would have found out), shortly after this happened, and it was
pointed out that she had by far the most publicity of any Member of
the Scottish Parliament at that stage.
· The right for the Scottish Parliament or Welsh Assembly to
decide a policy relevant to its area of the UK, if it votes to remove
the policy from Westminster. This may include abolishing the council
tax in their areas in favour of a local income tax, renationalising
Scottish or Welsh rail companies without compensation (except for
pension schemes which may have invested some money in them), or
modifying income tax levels, for the rich or poor, by any amount.
· The abolition of the House of Lords and the monarchy. These
are relics of feudalism!
· Annual elections at all levels of government. This was a
key demand of the Chartists. It is obvious why it has never been
granted - history would be massively speeded up if we could get rid
of the politicians who promise one thing and do another in a matter
of months not years.
· Opposition to Britain adopting the Euro. Obviously having a
single currency for many countries has reduced the abilities of
governments to affect their economies
· Opposition to the proposed European constitution. The
European President, chosen not by the people of Europe but the select
few politicians who claim to represent us, would have a huge amount
of power to meddle in British politics.
· Opposition to New Labour's proposed introduction of ID
cards. If introduced, they would give the state far more information
about us, enabling organisations like MI5 and the CIA to increase
their harassment and persecution of activists, using the tactic of
infiltrating political groups in order to subvert them from within.

The democratic demands of the Campaign are in bold [on the printed
leaflets; they are the first sentences of each point]. The remaining
text explains why the points are important. I've set up an internet
discussion group (mailing list) for the campaign (go to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/campaign-for-democracy-in-the-uk) as
well as a website (http://www.democracycampaign.org.uk).


My call for `Democratic Socialist Alliances' in England and Wales

The SWP abandoned the Socialist Alliances in England and Wales to set
up `Respect: the Unity Coalition', alongside George Galloway MP who
was shown on British TV shaking hands with Saddam Hussein and saying
what a great guy he was. It has become clear, after Respect's
national conference at the end of October, that dissent within
Respect has been crushed, so there is now no chance that it will
evolve into an organisation like the Scottish Socialist Party.

At the forthcoming conference of the Network of Socialist Alliances
in England, known as the `Socialist Alliance' (SA) for short, I will
be proposing that it renames itself the `Democratic Socialist
Alliance' (DSA). If the conference votes to wind up the SA, then I
will propose that a new organisation called the DSA is formed. The
word `Democratic' is important for two reasons. Firstly, it clarifies
that we are not in favour of the sort of regime that collapsed in the
USSR and Eastern Europe. Secondly, it distances us from the
bureaucratic way the SWP ran most SAs. I am also proposing the
establishment of a Revolutionary Platform of the DSA.

The Welsh SA has already been wound up. I am planning to help set up
a Penarth DSA in the town I lived in for my last five years at school
(about five miles from Cardiff), which will then create a Welsh DSA
based in Cardiff. I will propose that the Welsh DSA sets up
a `Campaign for Democracy in Wales', to organise a demonstration
outside the Welsh Assembly calling for more powers for that Assembly
linked to greater democracy in the UK as a whole. I will also propose
that the Welsh DSA stands a candidate in the forthcoming general
election in the Cardiff South and Penarth constituency, against the
hated Blairite and former leader of the Assembly, Alun Michael. I
think we would stand a good chance of winning, which would be a
massive boost for world socialism!

I will also be spending a sizeable amount of time in Glasgow in the
run-up to the election, to try to get at least one SSP MP as well.


Oppose the fascist BNP students
(who infiltrated the Socialist Workers Party and led SWSS last year)

Manchester University student Joe Finnan and Manchester Metropolitan
University student Diane Stoker are both members of the fascist
British National Party (BNP) who infiltrated the Socialist Workers
Party (SWP) for the whole of the last academic year, and played
leading roles in the SWP's student wing, the Socialist Worker Student
Society (SWSS). Both of the infiltrators attended the SWP's national
conference, and they were seriously involved in the most important
organisations the SWP got involved with: Respect from its formation,
the Stop the War Coalition, Manchester Against Racism, Unite Against
Fascism (UAF) and Globalise Resistance. BNP infiltrator Finnan became
the treasurer for Respect North West (which has perhaps incidentally
accumulated a large debt from the European elections). The SWP
allowed them unlimited access to membership lists, petitions, email
groups and other internal information of all these organisations at
quite a high level, and put them in charge of recruitment for the
anti-capitalist organisation Globalise Resistance at the SWP's summer
event Marxism 2004. UAF national secretary Weyman Bennett regarded
them as close friends and often contacted them for advice, according
to the BNP.

I got most of my information on the BNP's infiltration of the SWP
from the internet, since I am not aware of ever meeting them. Visit
both of the following websites for left-wing perspectives on their
infiltration: (the archive of http://www.socialistunitynetwork.co.uk
and http://www.workerspower.com/index.php?id=26,101,0,0,1,0) and a
page on the BNP's website gloating about their achievement
(http://www.bnp.org.uk/articles/left_infiltration.htm). [Some anti-
fascists may object to me providing a link to a page on a fascist
website, on the basis of "no platform for fascists", but it is
important to know your enemy and it is so straightforward to search
the internet that anybody who wanted to could search out this page
(which is actually informative enough to be worth looking at).
Besides, I cannot imagine anybody except the most die-hard agent of
big business reading my material and becoming converted to fascism by
reading the BNP's simplistic policies.]

Both of the fascists have returned to university this year and they
must be prevented from building a BNP branch in Manchester. Both
lecturers' unions, the AUT and NATFHE, are opposed to teaching
fascists, but whether the local branches of those unions or of the
National Union of Students are able to take strong action against
them remains to be seen. The main aim of fascism is to attack
organisations of the working class, which is why the Nazis were
funded in Germany by big business.


Infiltration and wrecking of the Militant Tendency

It is only to be expected that any serious political organisation
would face infiltration by conspiratorial organisations opposed to it
in order to spy on its activities, gather names and addresses, etc.
However, it is generally assumed that the infiltrators only indulge
in spying on it rather than subverting it from within. Nevertheless,
if a left-wing organisation/party was of a sufficient threat to big
business (or was thought to be likely to become such a threat in the
future if left unchecked) then it would clearly be desirable from
their point of view to try to wreck it by any means possible. The
most serious infiltration would be undertaken by an organisation more
secretive than MI5 or the CIA, so that a whistleblower like Richard
Tomlinson or David Shayler could not spill the beans.

The Militant Tendency was a very serious threat to big business in
the 1980s and early 1990s, due to its roles in leading Liverpool's
Labour Council and the mass poll tax non-payment campaign, which
inflicted on Margaret Thatcher her only two serious defeats – winning
extra money for Liverpool in the first year, and defeating the poll
tax sweeping her out of office. Huge `mistakes' were made in both
campaigns – redundancy notices were sent out to the entire workforce
in Liverpool supposedly to buy time, and after the poll tax riot in
1990 the Anti-Poll Tax Federation Secretary Steve Nally said on
national TV that there would be an investigation which would `name
names'. In my opinion, big business had predicted that Militant would
become strong, planted infiltrators within the organisation and kept
most of them in place as it (now called the Socialist Party)
massively shrunk in size, largely due to the actions of the
infiltrators. Its failure in 1998 to support the proposal of Scottish
Militant Labour (SML) to set up the Scottish Socialist Party (SSP),
and the irrational reasons used to justify its opposition, indicated
that the infiltrators were dominating that once powerful
organisation. However, the Socialist Party is still quite strong in
some areas, particularly where it has councillors, so a revival
cannot be ruled out. More significantly, I believe that the platform
of the SSP that arose from SML (the ISM) will play a leading role in
enabling the SSP to lead a revolution in Scotland, and that the
Scottish socialist revolution will quickly spread around the world.


State/fascist/socialist infiltration of organisations to undermine or
support them from within

Although the BNP have toyed with a bit of infiltration, quite
possibly for the first time, another fascist organisation called the
National Revolutionary Faction (NRF) have been doing it extremely
seriously for years. A few years ago, it was revealed on the "UK Left
Network" mailing list that two members of London Socialist Alliance,
who were leaders of the South London Republican Forum and called
themselves revolutionary socialists, had been collaborating with the
NRF for about a year. Somebody else on the list found a page on their
website (which has since been removed) giving advice to fascist
cadres for infiltrating organisations in society, including those of
the left (but also others in society such as the police, the NHS and
education). The NRF had (and presumably still has) a complicated
hierarchical structure with several layers corresponding to different
depths they had reached within the organisations they were
infiltrating. I produced a draft resolution against state/fascist
infiltration based on the discussion, which you can find on my
website (at http://www.stevewallis.org/lsa-resolution.htm). This
discussion proved very useful in starting to publicise my ideas about
the infiltration that takes place in society and I wrote the first
version of my "Socialism and Conspiracies" document soon after.
Unfortunately, I have since been chucked off that list (and another
list on which the discussion took place). If you have enjoyed reading
this message, and want to read more of my views about infiltration by
conspiratorial organisations on the side of the two key classes: big
business (to try to stop a world socialist revolution) and the
working class (to neutralise those on the side of big business
enabling a revolution to take place), as well as other vested
interests such as fascism, the middle class and Islamic
fundamentalism, you can read the most recent version of that document
(at http://www.stevewallis.org/soc-cons5.htm).

--
Steve Wallis (socialiststeve@y...; http://www.stevewallis.org).

Convenor of Manchester International Socialist Movement
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/manchesterism).

Initiator of the Campaign for Democracy in the UK
(http://www.democracycampaign.org.uk;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/campaign-for-democracy-in-the-uk).

Initiator of the Revolutionary Platform of the Democratic Socialist
Alliance
(http://www.revolutionaryplatformofdemocraticsocialistalliance.org;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/revolutionary-platform-of-democratic-
socialist-alliance).

Visit the websites of the Scottish Socialist Party
(http://www.scottishsocialistparty.org) and the International
Socialist Movement platform of the SSP (http://www.redflag.org.uk).