... Faulty neural intuition! ;) ... Well that's an interesting persepctive. Indeed that's literally correct. And it proves that that wasn't what I was really...
... of target ... have to ... compare ... Yes, and admittedly, we could question the straight additivity. But what do you mean by "ad-hoc smoothing step"? That...
... I just meant that if you *have* a function that is "correct" based on theory, and its not working, applying smoothing to it strikes me as an ad-hoc...
... to ... But ... be ... on ... an ... to work ... Who mentioned smoothing? I must be missing something. There was nothing "ad-hoc" or less "correct" about...
... I got it by putting 2 and 2 together from these messages... ... But of course you also said: ... Ok. I know too little about this and I'm probably not...
... set ... based ... as ... 'Splining' is not smoothing. It's a method of *interpolation*. In other words, if I've calculated a function only at integer cents...
... Ok, I got confused by that one sentence of Gene's. By "function in question" I didn't understand "function being approximated" but rather "function being...
... between ... = ... the wrong ... something ... something rounded, ... first ... Therefore ... having ... given ... (x) - ... because ... rest of ... ...
Gotcha ... ^2 ... squaring ... between ... useless ... the ... then ... linear ... would ... side ... the ... this for ... OS X, but ... I was ... anything ......
... Well then we can revisit the implications. I didn't say all that just to be right. ;) Does the other stuff I wrote make more sense now and do you have ...
... just to be ... you have ... Well, I'm not sure what do with this because 1. As you pointed out, you could only apply this to one mimimum at a time, not...
... Ok, you're making me repeat myself, but I guess that's not too bad, since I guess I wasn't clear enough. But throwing out half-baked ideas is part of my...
... do ... at a ... since I ... part of ... create a ... whether the HE ... functions ... Yes, I remember that. ... them. And ... that it may ... Well,...
... Yes, that may indeed be true. I think I'm getting it more clearly now. The different assumption of distribution affects the curve, but in a slightly ...
... you ... now. The ... slightly ... Yes. ... by ... Don't rule out the possibility that there might be no difference! ... I thought it sounded like changing...
... Right. ... Yes, even deeper than I intended to go! ... Interesting. ... What kind of algorithms are you using? ... You are saying this is a way of rating...
... (including ... the ... or ... since ... favor ... scales, ... ones in ... I have the Matlab Optimization Toolbox. It's got all the state-of-the- art...
... So does it choose them for you or do you choose them? Seems like there should be a class of algorithms specific to fractal-like functions that might offer...
... the- ... Either way. ... Umm . . . no ... Well, finding *global* minima, even of smooth functions, is already very hard, and there's no general method or...
... Well then my gut reaction (which I'm not attached too, either) is that there may not *be* any more intelligent approach for automated optimization of this...
... of- ... functions ... already ... was ... searches, ... over ... with ... that there ... optimization of ... I think there may be, because the function has...
... The ... talking ... that are ... exact when ... the same ... timbre is rich ... perceptibility beyond ... What I've always said is that timbre can have a...
hey hey, just thought id tell you guys about this free debt consolidation site that reduced my monthly payments by damn near half, no more worries about bills!...
Having problems with message search?
Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.
