i say go for the moderator option. now that doesnt mean im offering
to be a moderator myself, cos quite frankly.. im a lazy asshole. but
yeah, sure sounds much better than letting the spammers post and/or
shutting the site down. cheers! ~Bob

P.S. The offspring still fuckin kick ass, i dont care what people say.

P.P.S. What's "IMHO"?

P.P.P.S. Dexter likes this band: http://www.theadolescents.net/
(check it out!)


--- In offspringanarchyzone@yahoogroups.com, stry_cat <no_reply@y...>
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 5 or 6 years ago I started this group and almost immediately
appointed
> two others to manage the group. I actually lost interest in The
> Offspring after their last several albums were IMHO not that good
and
> have rarely participated in this group. Their latest seems to be
> awesome and so I'm actually kinda interested in this Yahoo group
> again.
>
> But I return to find that the spammers make about 90% of the posts
> here. I can require future posts to be approved by a moderator,
but
> that means 3 or 4 of y'all need to volunteer to be moderators. The
> other options are to continue to let the spammers make 90% of the
> posts or to just shut down the group.
>
> I'd like to know what y'all want. I don't intend to take an active
> role in management of this group, but I hope it will continue.
>
> Please post your opinions on the list.
>
> stry_cat