krnewman wrote:

> In my experience it depends on the recording, although in general
> usually PLII is better than either SQ or QS for decoding a regular
> stereo recording to try to get some interesting rear action, and SQ
> sounds better than QS

I've also found the PLII will do a DAMN good job at decoding SQ encoded
CD's!

--

-*-Scot
ScotClayton@... <mailto:ScotClayton@...>
www.ScotClayton.org <http://www.ScotClayton.org>
www.SMCProductions.org <http://www.SMCProductions.org>*

* Clayton Clan Blog <http://scotclayton.blogspot.com/>**
www.RonnieJamesDio.org <http://www.RonnieJamesDio.org> (The ORIGINAL Dio
Msg Board)*
* www.CraigGoldy.org <http://www.CraigGoldy.org>*

* www.TonyIommi.org <http://www.TonyIommi.org>*
/ RonnieJamesDio.org 24/7 Rocking Radio
<http://launch.yahoo.com/lc/?rt=0&rp1=0&rp2=1215640292>/


----------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.13/47 - Release Date: 12-Jul-05


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]