I know what you are experiencing. And I am very glad. Indeed, glad you
checked out Queen 1, as well, since that album does really matrix out
nicely. If pressed to the wall, I believe that II is actually a quad
mix (as per the legend) and I is just a really fine piece of
engineering with some extra out-of-phase action that makes it matrix
nicely. It is possible, I suppose, that they are both just superbly
engineered stereo mixes based on the kind of 60s studio wizardry stuff
that matrixes out nicely. It is highly unlikely that they are both
quad mixes, so I'll stick with my unconfirmed belief that I is a
well-engineered album that matrixes nicely and II is an unofficial
quad release. Either way, it's some good listening, there. It all just
leaps out and grabs you. Very 3D.

--- In quadraphonicquad@yahoogroups.com, dgosha@... wrote:
>
> OK, so now I have Queen I on and it is also incredible! It's like
listening
> to these albums for the first time! Spacious and so much presence in
the
> guitars and stuff in the back channels.
>
> Thanks for bringing this up you guys!
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************
> Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and
> favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&
> icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>