Excellent suggetions, including the forum.

As a general rule, well made 60's albums, and anything with lots of
percussion or electronics seems to do well. Many, many strictly stereo
albums matrix out better than many of the "offical" quad releases.
Once you have a decoder, a world of adventure awaits!

--- In quadraphonicquad@yahoogroups.com, dgosha@... wrote:
>
> In answer to the question of other stereo albums that sound good in
quad, you
> kind of have to just try them and see if there were enough phase
relationship
> differences when the album was recorded to make some of the material
appear
> in the back channels.
>
> Elektra from the late sixties, early seventies seems to have
particularly
> recorded rock groups well then with spacious sonics and this lends
itself well to
> quadraphonic decoding.
>
> Another pretty good one I have is the Crabby Appleton album from
1970. It was
> already really good in stereo and an SQ decoder just makes it all
the better
> with congas and other percussion (especially) appearing in the back.
>
> Another is "Be Yourself Tonight" by the Eurythmics. Although a later
album on
> RCA, there's a lot going on in the back with a decoder.
>
> Also, on the QuadraphonicQuad forum site, there is a forum that
lists and
> discusses stereo records that cound good in quad.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************
> One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail,
> Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now.
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&
> icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>