Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
songwriters-network · The Songwriters Network
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
New Woodshed Information.......   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #5262 of 7638 |
Hi everyone, it's Paul.

Still no response from Ms. Greuel but we have to keep sending letters to her
and the Mayor. I know it will work if we stay focused. We can not move
forward without her pro-active support. I do hope I explained that clearly
in my last email to you regarding Ms. Greuel's reply letter that many of you
received.

I have spent a lot of time talking to people with the City. You'd be
surprised at some of the things they told me. The following is additional
information that you all should know. Perhaps we can approach our struggle
from this angle as well.

When I originally read the Kulak's Woodshed variance we were granted , I
discovered some very glaring contradictory language. It basically said that
we are within our right to be in this location. I wanted to address the
issue but decided it would be better to move on and leave well enough alone.
That is a decision I deeply regret.

The following are statements in the variance written by the Zoning
Administration.

-"The use (Kulak's Woodshed) has the characteristics of various clearly
identifiable permitted uses in the underlying permitted C1.5 Zone" (the
Woodshed is located in a C1.5 zone)
-"For example, an auditorium and a concert hall with a maximum seating
capacity for 3,000 persons are permitted uses in the C1.5 Zone which
involves live music performances with an audience."
-"Thus the use clearly fits within the parameters of these similarly
permitted uses in the C1.5 Zone.

Click here http://www.kulakswoodshed.com/var/variance.shtml to read the
entire variance.

It is clear that we never should have been required to apply for a variance.
We need to demand that the variance be dismissed and call for an independent
third party investigation to determine the truth about Peyton's claims.
There is no parking problem, and the more we can prove that Peyton's
accusations are false the better the chance we have of succeeding. We need
Wendy Greuel's to help us with pro-active support. PLEASE, keep sending
those emails, letters and make those phone calls.

Thanks again
Paul


Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:43 am

paulkulak@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #5262 of 7638 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi everyone, it's Paul. Still no response from Ms. Greuel but we have to keep sending letters to her and the Mayor. I know it will work if we stay focused. We...
Paul Kulak
paulkulak@...
Send Email
Dec 15, 2006
11:49 am

Stop using Mr. Peytons name in your postings, You know he did nothing, you are a liar...Quit your lies and using his name. it is in violation to the TRO order...
timesexpired
Offline Send Email
Dec 15, 2006
9:32 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help