Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

theatre-sf · Theatre Organ Soundfonts

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 545
  • Category: Theater Organ
  • Founded: Nov 14, 2001
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 10613 - 10643 of 13142   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#10613 From: Roy Radford <radford_roy@...>
Date: Tue Oct 2, 2007 10:29 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
roy.radford42
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Ed,
 
         I prefer to use analogue swell control and avoid MIDI altogether for just that reason. If you really want to use MIDI, it seems to me that you need a MIDI encoder which only samples the pedals every 30mS or so to avoid a ridiculous number of messages flooding the system. Shouldn't be too difficult to program a PICS micro to do that. I've just finished programming one to encode the pedal and piston switch matrix. Some PICS have onboard ADC functions, which would make life easier.
 
     Have fun,
 
        Roy.

enupnau@... wrote:
I was able to download the pdf file directly from the attachment on the post. BTW, thanks Owen, interesting and well thought out. 
 
Was wondering if there would be a non-contact way of using this approach to generate MIDI messages? I have attached a pot to my swell pedals, but the overwhelming MIDI seemed to slow down the computer, especially when "pumping" the pedal for emphasis. Wondering if the above "indirect" approach could be a better way of control??
 
Rgds,
Ed




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.


Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Try it now.

#10614 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Tue Oct 2, 2007 10:48 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
I also was able to download the pdf file directly from
the attachment on the post. Perhaps it's a Yahoo
thing.

Roy, what is the frequency response of an LDR anyway.
Is there any other reason for not wanting to pass
audio through one?

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=

#10615 From: enupnau@...
Date: Tue Oct 2, 2007 10:01 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
engrssc
Send Email Send Email
 
 receive post(s) via email on AOL - saw the attached file levelcontrol.pdf (465.8 KB) - bottom left corner. Clicked the Download Now (under Attached File) to my Organ Stuff thumb drive and the rest is history.
 
Rgds,
Ed




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

#10616 From: Owen Jones <solovoxh@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:51 am
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
solovoxh
Send Email Send Email
 
I still have the Devtronix swell controllers, but like most other things, with the advances in technology, they now sit (retired) on a shelf.
 
I use the MIDI swell cc 11 on channels 15(main) and 16(solo) and on a  port that is the least busy and to date I have not had any problems; other methods will most likely result in many cyphers, necessitating a panic button (all notes off)
I usually set the range 50 ~ 127; so when the swell is closed there is still audio, just like a pipe organ swell.
 
rgds
 
Owen

enupnau@... wrote:
I was able to download the pdf file directly from the attachment on the post. BTW, thanks Owen, interesting and well thought out. 
 
Was wondering if there would be a non-contact way of using this approach to generate MIDI messages? I have attached a pot to my swell pedals, but the overwhelming MIDI seemed to slow down the computer, especially when "pumping" the pedal for emphasis. Wondering if the above "indirect" approach could be a better way of control??
 
Rgds,
Ed




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.



http://theatreorgans.com/owenjones/


Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it now.

#10617 From: Owen Jones <solovoxh@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:53 am
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
solovoxh
Send Email Send Email
 
Didn't know that, I will upload it right away.

"Harold M. Whipps" <hmwhippssr@...> wrote:
Hi Roy,

I think I know what is happening. I do not get messages via e-mail. I use the web to read
the group messages. If you look at Owen's message on the group web page, you will see
the attachment box and it says "Attachment(not stored)". As a result, I have no access to
it. That's where the "Files" page comes in.

Regards,

Harold

--- In theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com, Roy Radford <radford_roy@...> wrote:
>
> Hi, Harold,
>
> Well, I don't know whether someone has changed the rules, but it attached fine
in my mailbox!
>
> Have fun,
>
> Roy.
>
> "Harold M. Whipps" <hmwhippssr@...> wrote:
> Hi Owen,
>
> You cannot attach anything on or in a message. It will have to be placed in the "Files"
> section. See box on the left of the page.
>
> --- In theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com, Owen Jones <solovoxh@> wrote:
> >
> > For those who are interested in this for their organ, I have attached a pdf file, that
> describes it.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Owen
> >
> >
> > http://theatreorgans.com/owenjones/
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it now.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
>




http://theatreorgans.com/owenjones/


Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. Get it now.

#10618 From: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:58 am
Subject: New file uploaded to theatre-sf
theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello,

This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the theatre-sf
group.

   File        : /levelcontrol.pdf
   Uploaded by : solovoxh <solovoxh@...>
   Description : Expression Control

You can access this file at the URL:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theatre-sf/files/levelcontrol.pdf

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files

Regards,

solovoxh <solovoxh@...>

#10619 From: Cliff Benham <flyback1@...>
Date: Tue Oct 2, 2007 6:32 pm
Subject: Halloween Music?
rt3122r
Send Email Send Email
 
As Halloween approaches there is a question someone reading this list
may, I hope, be able to answer.

Can anyone tell me the title and composer [and some history?] of a very
early piece of silent film 'curse' music
as follows?

G-C-E-A-F---EDCBA...

It was discussed ~20 years ago on an NPR radio program about silent film
music.

A comment was made that the copyright owners for this 'curse' music were
quite vigilant in searching
out all performances so they could charge for it's use. I'd really like
to know what silent film it was
originally written for and the other films in which it has been played.

The NPR program featured an interview with the conductor of the
Jacksonville [FL] Symphonie who spoke
of an upcoming Halloween silent film festival for which he would conduct
'The Phantom of the Opera'
orchestral film score live while the others would be played by a theater
organist..

Thanks for any help with my curiosity.

Cliff

#10620 From: David Speck <Dave@...>
Date: Tue Oct 2, 2007 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
dspeck13021
Send Email Send Email
 
I wonder if it would be possible to instruct the swell to MIDI interface
to update the volume level less frequently.

If you are trying to get 128 volume levels from a swing of the shoe,
then I could see how you could flood the MIDI channel with too many
messages in a short time.  I don't think the average listener could
distinguish that many gradations.

OTOH, if you settled for 15 or 20 levels across the span, then there
would be far fewer MIDI messages being sent out for a swing of the swell
shoe.

Seems to be something that should be adjustable in software.

Dave
> I have attached a pot to my swell pedals, but the overwhelming MIDI
> seemed to slow down the computer, especially when "pumping" the pedal
> for emphasis. Wondering if the above "indirect" approach could be a
> better way of control??
>

#10621 From: "Frank Evans" <evans@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:03 am
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
evanshf
Send Email Send Email
 
FWIW.... Rodgers used photocells by passing audio through them for analog organs for years. Works great if done correctly.
Regards Frank Evans
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [theatre-sf] Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL


I also was able to download the pdf file directly from
the attachment on the post. Perhaps it's a Yahoo
thing.

Roy, what is the frequency response of an LDR anyway.
Is there any other reason for not wanting to pass
audio through one?

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=


#10622 From: "ronwhat" <radionut44@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 12:21 am
Subject: Playing MIDI files on MidiTzer 216 ver 0.84
ronwhat
Send Email Send Email
 
Of the MIDI files in the files section only HBDAY.mid turns on any
stops when I play it. It turns on 4 stops in the solo with the 4
control changes on channel 16. (I am using MIDI-OX, MIDI Yoke and MIDI
Bar.) The other MIDI files play, but only if I turn on stops manually
or with pistons. Is there some way I can get the piston/stop changes
that are seemingly in the MIDI files on channels 1-3 to function? I
have read of people watching the swells change during playing as well,
but I am not getting any volume changes either. All help appreciated!
Ron

#10623 From: enupnau@...
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 3:35 am
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
engrssc
Send Email Send Email
 
Rodgers used photocells by passing audio through them for analog organs for years. Works great if done correctly.
Regards Frank Evans
 
My Rodgers 340 does the above as Frank states. Issue is with Hauptwerk, MidiTzer and other virtual organs which use MIDI control. No problem when using the MIDI operated swell in a "normal"/slower manner, just when moving it repeatedly and quickly. I get no cyphers or other problems, just the playing gets what I would call sluggish, almost as if it is a pneumatic operated console.
 
Rgds,
Ed




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

#10625 From: "hardyjp4064" <toplayer2@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:04 pm
Subject: Barton 3/10 Alpha
hardyjp4064
Send Email Send Email
 

The Barton 3/10 project is progressing well. An alpha version using MidiTzer + GigaStudio has been constructed.

 

The sound is nice, although quite different from other sample sets. Every pipe is sampled both with and without trem. All samples are 6 to 10 seconds in length and in stereo. Average size is over 200 megabytes per rank. The natural ambiance of the theatre is captured in the sustain portion and in the approximately 0.7 second release samples included with every note of every rank. No additional reverb is needed for stereo (although the final Hauptwerk version will employ convolved reverb for mid and rear channels in an eight channel configuration). It is interesting how important the stereo samples are for ambiance, a note will start in one channel and the reverb will trail off in the opposite channel, giving a real sense of the space.

 

The current status of the ranks is as follows (complete unless otherwise noted):

 

·        16' Tuba 85

·        16' Tibia Clausa 85 - missing bottom octave

·        16' Flute 85 - need to re-record entire rank

·        8' Open Diapason 73

·        8' Oboe Horn 61

·        8' Vox Humana 61

·        8' Clarinet 61

·        8' Kinura 61

·        8' VDO 73

·        8' VDO Celeste 61

·        Piano 85

·        Xylophone

·        Chrysoglott - 0% completed

·        Glockenspiel - 0% completed

·        Traps - 90% completed

 

If you own GigaStudio v3 or GVI and wish to participate in an early alpha test, please contact me.

Joe H.


#10626 From: "Per S" <per.schultz@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 2:08 pm
Subject: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
schultzpo
Send Email Send Email
 
I midified my Rodgers with the Midibox system. The Midi control for the
Swell operation has an indispensable, adjustable, parameter
called "Deadband". What is does is to define the how much voltage
change (pot movement) is required before Midi commands are transmitted.
The effect is that a positive movement of the Swell pedal is required
to send commands. Just resting the foot on the pedal doesn't send
anything. My setting has about 30 commands between 0 and 127, adequate
resolution and no risk of flooding the system.
There is a definite advantage of using Midi control since most VTPO's
have a Swell box filtering system.
Per S

#10627 From: "Don.Springer" <don.springer@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 10:24 pm
Subject: RE: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
donaldjspringer
Send Email Send Email
 

Have you considered a second midi interface device on the computer, so that you can separate the expression onto a different midi buss.

 

 

From: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of enupnau@...
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 2:35 AM
To: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [theatre-sf] Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL

 

Rodgers used photocells by passing audio through them for analog organs for years. Works great if done correctly.

Regards Frank Evans

 

My Rodgers 340 does the above as Frank states. Issue is with Hauptwerk, MidiTzer and other virtual organs which use MIDI control. No problem when using the MIDI operated swell in a "normal"/slower manner, just when moving it repeatedly and quickly. I get no cyphers or other problems, just the playing gets what I would call sluggish, almost as if it is a pneumatic operated console.

 

Rgds,

Ed




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.


#10628 From: Pete Knobloch <peteknobloch@...>
Date: Wed Oct 3, 2007 11:17 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
peteknobloch
Send Email Send Email
 

Take Don¢s advice,

 

Having a separate MIDI port going into the computer is one of the best solutions when it comes to those bandwidth steeling MIDI expression pedals.  Never put them in series with your MIDI keyboards. Even using a MIDI merger that sends the midi data via the standard 5 pin DIN to the PC is just asking for trouble. If your merger box uses a USB interface to get the data to the PC, it will probably work.

 

If there was a way to get the pedal to only send 1 message every 20ms or so, this would solve your problem.  Many of the controllers try to pump out data as quickly as the midi port can handle which is about 1 full message every 1ms.   

 

I must say that on many of the MIDI ready organs, you can¢t separate the MIDI ports for the pedal expression and the playing notes. In this case, disable the MIDI expression and feed the PC output into the organ input jacks in the back.  If this can¢t be done, I guess you are out of luck.

 

Pete



----- Original Message ----
From: Don.Springer <don.springer@...>
To: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2007 3:24:00 PM
Subject: RE: [theatre-sf] Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL

Have you considered a second midi interface device on the computer, so that you can separate the expression onto a different midi buss.

 

 

From: theatre-sf@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:theatre- sf@yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of enupnau@aol. com
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 2:35 AM
To: theatre-sf@yahoogro ups.com
Subject: Re: [theatre-sf] Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL

 

Rodgers used photocells by passing audio through them for analog organs for years. Works great if done correctly.

Regards Frank Evans

 

My Rodgers 340 does the above as Frank states. Issue is with Hauptwerk, MidiTzer and other virtual organs which use MIDI control. No problem when using the MIDI operated swell in a "normal"/slower manner, just when moving it repeatedly and quickly. I get no cyphers or other problems, just the playing gets what I would call sluggish, almost as if it is a pneumatic operated console.

 

Rgds,

Ed

Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Yahoo! News

Get it all here

Breaking news to

entertainment news

Yahoo! Finance

It's Now Personal

Guides, news,

advice & more.

Best of Y! Groups

Check it out

and nominate your

group to be featured.

.




Luggage? GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.

#10629 From: Roy Radford <radford_roy@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 12:15 am
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
roy.radford42
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Eugene,
 
                There could be two meanings to the frequency response of a PR cell:
 
  1) It's response to an AC signal of varying frequency  passed at constant light level. I have never seen any data on this, but since both Rogers and Technics have used them in this mode, I presume it is adequate for audio purposes.
 
  2) The response to a step change in light level. From datasheets and my own experience, this varies enormously with light level. At 100 F/C it is a few mS, but at very low light levels it can be several minutes or even hours. Datasheets typically quote dark currents after 16 hours! Still, 1 inch from a 1W torch bulb would give ~ 100F/C, so the problem is manageable.
 
    As to other reasons for cold control, noise is the biggest question. The pedals are a long way from the main audio path, and I prefer not to take the audio signal all around the nation if I can help it.
 
    I know this is a different world but, higher frequencies...Shorter distances... When I was in the business of designing 100MHz oscilloscopes, we used to go to great lengths to avoid bringing the signal up to the front panel. Indeed, it was the balanced modulators we used for passive gain control that set me thinking along these lines.
 
   The other question is that of multiple channels. With active control, you need as many cells as audio channels. Then you need them all to receive the same light level, and respond in the same way. CS cells are not good in this respect, and can vary over a 3:1 ratio at the same light level unless you hand match them. Long-tailed pair transistor modulator systems shift the signal current by e:1 for every 27mV differential change of base voltage, and this is unlikely to vary by more than+/- 10% from one pair to another, especially if you use monolithic transistor arrays rather than separate transistors.
 
    Please bear in mind that this is all armchair theorising so far. With shed repairs, other house decorating and tarting up the pedal unit, I doubt whether I will get into the practical work this year!
 
    I trust this confuses the situation completely! 
 
     Have fun,
 
        Roy.
 
   

Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...> wrote:

I also was able to download the pdf file directly from
the attachment on the post. Perhaps it's a Yahoo
thing.

Roy, what is the frequency response of an LDR anyway.
Is there any other reason for not wanting to pass
audio through one?

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=


For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.

#10630 From: "patrickmm97" <patrickmm97@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 5:42 am
Subject: Soundcard External Volume Control
patrickmm97
Send Email Send Email
 
This is old info but for those that are not aware, both the
Soundblaster Live and the Audigy sound cards have jumpers, J5 on the
Live and J8 on the Audigy that can be used for an analog way of
controlling the sound output level with a momentary rocker type switch
attached to a foot pedal. Push forward, sound increases. Push back,
sound decreases. Only thing is that after you reach the desired level
you have to lift from the pedal. Otherwise the level continues up or
down. Takes a bit of getting use to but it works with a bit of
practice. Just do a web search on these jumper numbers for the
appropriate card and you will find which pin numbers make it go up or
down. Separate momentary foot push buttons  can also be used for up or
down vol if you dont want to build a pedal. You can also mute the
sound with these jumpers. And the environmental audio room acoustics
for the sound output on these cards is a great feature too. The Audigy
can use ASIO drivers also which helps in the latency department. If
this is all too much hassle I guess you can still use midi vol control.

#10631 From: Russ Ashworth <russa@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 5:56 am
Subject: Re: Soundcard External Volume Control
russa1111
Send Email Send Email
 
Doesn't seem very realistic. Thanks for the info though.
Russ


patrickmm97 wrote:
> This is old info but for those that are not aware, both the
> Soundblaster Live and the Audigy sound cards have jumpers, J5 on the
> Live and J8 on the Audigy that can be used for an analog way of
> controlling the sound output level with a momentary rocker type switch
> attached to a foot pedal. Push forward, sound increases. Push back,
> sound decreases. Only thing is that after you reach the desired level
> you have to lift from the pedal. Otherwise the level continues up or
> down. Takes a bit of getting use to but it works with a bit of
> practice. Just do a web search on these jumper numbers for the
> appropriate card and you will find which pin numbers make it go up or
> down. Separate momentary foot push buttons  can also be used for up or
> down vol if you dont want to build a pedal. You can also mute the
> sound with these jumpers. And the environmental audio room acoustics
> for the sound output on these cards is a great feature too. The Audigy
> can use ASIO drivers also which helps in the latency department. If
> this is all too much hassle I guess you can still use midi vol control.
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>

--
Russ Ashworth
Miditzer, for when you just don't have a real Theatre Organ handy.
See www.virtualorgan.com

#10632 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: Soundcard External Volume Control
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
--- patrickmm97 <patrickmm97@...> wrote:
  ***And the environmental audio room acoustics
for the sound output on these cards is a great feature
too.***

Patrick, this is news to me so I'll check it out.
Thanks for that.

It seems to me that more work will need to be done in
the line of both swell shade volume emulation as well
as acoustical echo/reverb. If the impulse reverbs do
all that is required to replicate what goes on in an
actual theater, then that's enough.

In a theater, when the shades are barely open, little
reflective sound is noticed. The sound gets quite
personal, especially toward the first 1/3rd seating.
On full organ with shade wide open, sound is bouncing
about almost everywhere. This acoustical activity
would be difficult to duplicate by meerly space
identification/replication, using any impulse method
alone IMO. So remembering what I accomplished with the
fibre optics swell pedal, was to send to my DSP's a
varied degree of signal apart from just what was
coming from the organ output signal. The final effect
was excellent but I abandoned my analog ETOP project
when digital sythesis came about. Thanks to Roy and
his new topic, "expression control" I have found my 20
year old project swell pedal. Now I need to build
another one for the other chamber. Hope you all got
the picture attachment.

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=

#10633 From: Roy Radford <radford_roy@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 3:14 pm
Subject: Re: Soundcard External Volume Control
roy.radford42
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Eugene,
 
                No, I didn't get any attachement. Did anyone else? 
 
      Have fun,
 
          Roy.

Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...> wrote:

--- patrickmm97 <patrickmm97@yahoo.com> wrote:
***And the environmental audio room acoustics
for the sound output on these cards is a great feature
too.***

Patrick, this is news to me so I'll check it out.
Thanks for that.

It seems to me that more work will need to be done in
the line of both swell shade volume emulation as well
as acoustical echo/reverb. If the impulse reverbs do
all that is required to replicate what goes on in an
actual theater, then that's enough.

In a theater, when the shades are barely open, little
reflective sound is noticed. The sound gets quite
personal, especially toward the first 1/3rd seating.
On full organ with shade wide open, sound is bouncing
about almost everywhere. This acoustical activity
would be difficult to duplicate by meerly space
identification/replication, using any impulse method
alone IMO. So remembering what I accomplished with the
fibre optics swell pedal, was to send to my DSP's a
varied degree of signal apart from just what was
coming from the organ output signal. The final effect
was excellent but I abandoned my analog ETOP project
when digital sythesis came about. Thanks to Roy and
his new topic, "expression control" I have found my 20
year old project swell pedal. Now I need to build
another one for the other chamber. Hope you all got
the picture attachment.

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=


For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.

#10634 From: "hardyjp4064" <toplayer2@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
hardyjp4064
Send Email Send Email
 
Using an audio circuit to control expression has the advantage of
reducing MIDI traffic, but there are other factors to consider.  If one
wishes to use a MIDI sequencer to record performances, not having MIDI
expression data would mean loss of this important information.  MIDI
expression may also be used by an sample player to emulate the swell
shades with low-pass filter contouring and in some cases controlling
reverberation.

MIDI swell data overflow may or may not be a problem depending on
system used or one's playing style --  everyone know's an organist that
likes to pump the swell pedal to keep the beat :).

The best solution, IMHO, would be to thin out the expression data as
some have suggested.  Perhaps every so many milliseconds, every so many
MIDI messages, or only when the CC value is divisible by 2,3,4...etc.
I have sent a note to Roman Sowa of midi-hardware.com suggesting this
idea for his products.

Joe H.

#10635 From: Roy Radford <radford_roy@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 4:19 pm
Subject: Re: Re: EXPRESSION CONTROL
roy.radford42
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi, Joe,
 
          As I said, I would favour the time approach, sampling ~ every 30mS. That way you don't lose resolution when the pedal is moved slowly. You won't notice the loss when it is moved quickly.
 
     Have fun,
 
         Roy.

hardyjp4064 <toplayer2@...> wrote:
Using an audio circuit to control expression has the advantage of
reducing MIDI traffic, but there are other factors to consider. If one
wishes to use a MIDI sequencer to record performances, not having MIDI
expression data would mean loss of this important information. MIDI
expression may also be used by an sample player to emulate the swell
shades with low-pass filter contouring and in some cases controlling
reverberation.

MIDI swell data overflow may or may not be a problem depending on
system used or one's playing style -- everyone know's an organist that
likes to pump the swell pedal to keep the beat :).

The best solution, IMHO, would be to thin out the expression data as
some have suggested. Perhaps every so many milliseconds, every so many
MIDI messages, or only when the CC value is divisible by 2,3,4...etc.
I have sent a note to Roman Sowa of midi-hardware.com suggesting this
idea for his products.

Joe H.



For ideas on reducing your carbon footprint visit Yahoo! For Good this month.

#10636 From: "theorgandoc" <theorgandoc@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 11:25 pm
Subject: Expression Control
theorgandoc
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello to all,

Most pipe organ Swell Machines, or the independent swell shutters used
on theater organs utilized only 8 to 12 stages so why are we trying to
utilize 132 stages ?   ?   ?

Hopefully someone can figure out how to lighten the Midi load to
possibly 12 steps  !

Mel,  TheOrganDoc

#10637 From: "Don.Springer" <don.springer@...>
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 11:58 pm
Subject: RE: Expression Control
donaldjspringer
Send Email Send Email
 

I am expecting a Midi Solutions Pedal Controller to arrive tomorrow.

I will let you know how it works.

Since it is specifically designed to support continuous input devices like an expression pedal, I am hoping that it will work well.

IF not, I have a usb midi interface that I can use just for the midi expression.

However, I will not install unless it is needed.

 

 

 

From: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of theorgandoc
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 6:26 PM
To: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [theatre-sf] Expression Control

 

Hello to all,

Most pipe organ Swell Machines, or the independent swell shutters used
on theater organs utilized only 8 to 12 stages so why are we trying to
utilize 132 stages ? ? ?

Hopefully someone can figure out how to lighten the Midi load to
possibly 12 steps !

Mel, TheOrganDoc


#10638 From: "maxxarcade" <AJSTAY@...>
Date: Fri Oct 5, 2007 1:01 am
Subject: Re: Expression Control
maxxarcade
Send Email Send Email
 
I am using 8 stages for the expression in my organ, but there is some
noticeable "stepping" in the volume level.  Perhaps I could find a
way to smooth it out in software a bit?  I use jOrgan for my relay.

Perhaps real organs that use only a few shutters don't sound so rough
because of the room reverb?

--- In theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com, "Don.Springer" <don.springer@...>
wrote:
>
> I am expecting a Midi Solutions Pedal Controller to arrive tomorrow.
>
> I will let you know how it works.
>
> Since it is specifically designed to support continuous input
devices like
> an expression pedal, I am hoping that it will work well.
>
> IF not, I have a usb midi interface that I can use just for the midi
> expression.
>
> However, I will not install unless it is needed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com [mailto:theatre-
sf@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of theorgandoc
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 6:26 PM
> To: theatre-sf@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [theatre-sf] Expression Control
>
>
>
> Hello to all,
>
> Most pipe organ Swell Machines, or the independent swell shutters
used
> on theater organs utilized only 8 to 12 stages so why are we trying
to
> utilize 132 stages ? ? ?
>
> Hopefully someone can figure out how to lighten the Midi load to
> possibly 12 steps !
>
> Mel, TheOrganDoc
>

#10639 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Fri Oct 5, 2007 1:32 am
Subject: Re: Expression Control
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
--- theorgandoc <theorgandoc@...> wrote:

> Hopefully someone can figure out how to lighten the
> Midi load to
> possibly 12 steps  !

Won't that produce quite a "zipper" noise being digital?

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=

#10640 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Fri Oct 5, 2007 1:36 am
Subject: Youtube
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
Does anyone know who this chap is or what organ he is
playing. I think so because a couple of us have left
comments. In other words has he been emailing in this
group.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIeOCf-Y0EM

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=

#10641 From: HMRM461@...
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 9:42 pm
Subject: Re: Youtube
hmrm461
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Don,
 
That's Les Knoll.
 
John




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.

#10642 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Fri Oct 5, 2007 1:50 am
Subject: Re: Re: Expression Control
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
--- maxxarcade <AJSTAY@...> wrote:

> I am using 8 stages for the expression in my organ,
> but there is some
> noticeable "stepping" in the volume level.

  It's been called "Zipper" noise since the 80s and
every synth manufacturer has had to fix it with higher
digital resolution and or filtering. The fix being a
memory and resources hog. IMO midi volume is fine now
and living with memory sharing problems comes with the
airline lunch.

Eugene Don Hayek
Edonmusic Ramsey NJ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MIrxcTom3k&mode=user&search=
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Chamber/2175
http://www.theatreorgans.com/walnuthill/eugenehayek.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mh6oBdCTx8&mode=user&search=

#10643 From: Eugene Hayek <edonmusic@...>
Date: Fri Oct 5, 2007 1:51 am
Subject: Re: Youtube
edonmusic
Send Email Send Email
 
Messages 10613 - 10643 of 13142   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help