Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
theuniversal · The Universal
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Live Human Organ Havesting in Communist China   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #92 of 809 |
******** S.O.S. **********
As this is a serious problem against humanity, I would like to write to bring
your awareness.
I apologize for any inconvinience.

You maybe able to help by passing the report to whoever concerns.
Your contribution to human right counts, and can make a big difference.

Highly regards.

Lesh D.
International Human Rights Volunteer

(this is not a regular email nor website promotion, however, you may write to
unscrbr@... for un-subscription)

****************************************************
REPORT INTO ALLEGATIONS OF ORGAN
HARVESTING OF FALUN GONG PRACTITIONERS
IN CHINA
by David Matas and David Kilgour
6 July 2006
i
Table of Contents
A. Introduction
B. Working methods
C. The allegation
D. Difficulties of proof
E. Methods of Proof
F. Elements of proof and disproof
1) A perceived threat
2) A policy of persecution
3) Incitement to hatred
4) Massive Arrests
5) Repression
6) The unidentified and the disappeared
7) Sources of transplants
8) Blood testing
9) Corpses with missing organs
10) A confession
11) Admissions
12) Waiting times
13) Incriminating Information on Websites
14) Victim interviews
15) Human rights violations generally
16) Financial considerations
ii
17) Corruption
18) Legislation
G. Credibility of witnesses and investigators
H. Proposed further investigation
I. Conclusions
J. Recommendations
K. Commentary
L. Appendices
1) Letter of invitation from CIPFG
2) Biography of David Matas
3) Biography of David Kilgour
4) People interviewed
5) Letter to the Chinese embassy
6) Statements by the Government of China on Falun Gong
7) Physical persecution of the Falun Gong
8) Blood testing of Falun Gong prisoners
9) Unidentified Falun Gong in detention
10) Disappearances
11) AI's Records of Number of Executed Prisoners in China Each Year
12) Corpses with missing organs
13) Transcript of Interview
14) Transcripts of telephone investigations

A. Introduction
The Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of the Falun Gong in China (CIPFG),
a
nongovernmental organization registered in Washington, D.C. with a branch in
Ottawa,
Canada, by letter dated May 24, 2006 asked for our assistance in investigating
allegations that state institutions and employees of the government of People's
Republic of China have been harvesting organs from live Falun Gong
practitioners,
killing the practitioners in the process. The request letter is attached as an
appendix
to this report. Many of the friends of China, including us two, are concerned
about
these allegations. In light of their seriousness, as well as our own commitment
respecting
human dignity world wide, we accepted the request.
David Matas is an immigration, refugee and international human rights lawyer in
private practice in Winnipeg. He is actively involved in the promotion of
respect for human
rights as an author, speaker and participant in several human rights
non-governmental organizations.
David Kilgour is a former member of Parliament and a former Secretary of State
of
the Government of Canada for the Asia Pacific region. Before he became a
Parliamentarian, he was a Crown prosecutor. The biographies of both authors are
attached as appendices to this report.
B. Working Methods
We conducted our investigation independently from the CIPFG, the Falun Dafa
Association, any other organization, and any government. We sought to go to
China
unsuccessfully, but would be willing to go even subsequently to pursue a second
stage
of the investigation if access to witnesses and institutions can be obtained. We
interviewed a number of different people listed in an appendix to this report as
well
as read extensively any information we could obtain relevant to our report. We
were
not paid by anyone for this report but rather did this work as volunteers.

C. The Allegation
It is alleged that Falun Gong practitioners are victims of live organ harvesting
throughout China. The allegation is that organ harvesting is inflicted on
unwilling
Falun Gong practitioners at a wide variety of locations, pursuant to a
systematic policy, in
large numbers. Organ harvesting is a step in organ transplants. The purpose of
organ harvesting is
to provide organs for transplants. Transplants do not necessarily have to take
place in
the same place as the location of the organ harvesting. The two locations are
often
different, organs harvested in one place are shipped to another place for
transplanting.
The allegation is further that the organs are harvested from the practitioners
while
they are still alive. The practitioners are killed in the course of the organ
harvesting
operations or immediately thereafter. These operations are a form of murder.
Finally, we are told that the practitioners killed in this way are then
cremated. There
is no corpse left to examine to identify as the source of an organ transplant.
The thought of such a practice occurring, particularly if it might be at the
direction
of a government, at the beginning of the 21st century when the value of
individual
human life is finally gaining more widespread respect, is most alarming.
Accordingly, when
one of the first in camera witnesses, a woman who is not a Falun Gong
practitioner, met
in the course of this inquiry said that her surgeon husband told her that he
personally
removed the corneas from approximately 2000 anaesthetized Falun Gong prisoners
in northeast China during the two year period before October, 2003 ( at which
time he
refused to continue), we were shaken. Much of what we have encountered since,
as outlined in this report, has been almost equally disturbing.

D. Difficulties of proof
The allegations, by their very nature, are difficult either to prove or
disprove. The
best
evidence for proving any allegation is eye witness evidence. Yet for this
alleged
crime, there is unlikely to be any eye witness evidence.
The people present at the scene of organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners,
if
it does occur, are either perpetrators or victims. There are no bystanders.
Because
the victims, according to, the allegation are murdered and cremated, there is no
body
to be found, no autopsy to be conducted. There are no surviving victims to tell
what
happened to them. Perpetrators are unlikely to confess to what would be, if they
occurred, crimes against humanity. Nonetheless, though we did not get full scale
confessions, we garnered a surprising number of admissions through investigator
phone calls.
The scene of the crime, if the crime has occurred, leaves no traces. Once an
organ
harvesting is completed, the operating room in which it takes place looks like
any
other empty operating room.
The clampdown on human rights reporting in China makes assessment of the
allegations difficult. China, regrettably, represses human rights reporters and
defenders. There is no freedom of expression. Those reporting on human rights
violations from within China are often jailed and sometimes charged with
communicating state secrets. In this context, the silence of human rights
non-governmental organizations on organ harvesting of unwilling Falun Gong
practitioners tells us nothing.
The International Committee of the Red Cross is not allowed to visit prisoners
in
China. Nor is any other organization concerned with human rights of prisoners.
That also
cuts off a potential avenue of evidence.
China has no access to information legislation. It is impossible to get from the
Government of China basic information about organ transplants - how many
transplants there are, what is the source of the organs, how much is paid for
transplants or
where that money is spent.
We did seek to visit China for this report. Our efforts went nowhere. We asked
in
writing for a meeting with the embassy to discuss terms of entry. Our letter is
attached as an appendix to this report. Our request for a meeting was accepted.
But the
person who met with David Kilgour was interested only in denying the allegations
and not
in arranging for our visit.

E. Methods of proof
We have had to look at a number of factors, to determine whether they present a
picture, all together, which make the allegations either true or untrue. None of
these elements on its own either establishes or disproves the allegations.
Together, they
paint a picture.
Many of the pieces of evidence we considered, in themselves, do not constitute
ironclad proof of the allegation. But their non-existence might well have
constituted
disproof.
The combination of these factors, particularly when there are so many of them,
has
the effect of making the allegations believable, even when any one of them in
isolation
might not do so. Where every possible element of disproof we could identify
fails to
disprove the allegations, the likelihood of the allegations being true becomes
substantial.
Proof can be either inductive or deductive. Criminal investigation normally
works
deductively, stringing together individual pieces of evidence into a coherent
whole.
The limitations our investigation faced placed severe constraints in this
deductive
method.
Some elements from which we could deduce what was happening were,
nonetheless, available, in particular, the investigator phone calls.
We also used inductive reasoning, working backwards as well as forwards. If the
allegations were not true, how would we know it was not true? If the allegations
were true, what facts would be consistent with those allegations? What would
explain
the reality of the allegations, if the allegations were real? Answers to those
sorts of
questions which helped us to form our conclusions.

F. Elements of proof and disproof
We considered any and all elements of proof and disproof which were available
and
which might be available. Some evidentiary trails went nowhere. But we attempted
to follow them nonetheless.
1) Perceived threat
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to see Falun Gong as a threat to its
monopoly of ideological power over China in the late 1990s. This perceived
threat
does not prove the allegations. Yet, if the Falun Gong were not seen as a threat
to the
power of the CCP, the allegations would be undermined.
Falun Gong was founded in north eastern China in 1992 by Li Hongzhi. In the
1980s,
Li began practising qigong, a centuries-old system of breathing exercises -
occasionally referred to as "Chinese yoga" - which was thought to improve health
and spiritual
sensitivity. Qigong in all its variations was suppressed across the country in
1949
after the CCP seized office in Beijing, but the police state environment had
become less
oppressive by the 1980s for qigong in all forms, including Falun Gong.
Falun Gong had at the time only recently been developed by Li and included
elements of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. In essence, it teaches methods of
meditation through exercises intended to improve physical and spiritual health
and fitness. The
movement is not political and it followers seek to promote truth, tolerance and
compassion across racial, national and cultural boundaries. Violence is anathema
to
Falun Gong adherents. Li registered his movement with the government's Qigong
Research Association and by the mid-nineties claimed to have approximately 60
million practitioners. The Chinese Government's sports department itself
estimated that
there were 70 million adherents in 1999.
According to Professor Maria Hsia Chang's book, Falun Gong, published by Yale
University in 2004, "Reportedly, the middle-aged and those from the middle class
comprised (Falun
Gong's) main following, although its ranks also included students and the
elderly,
as well as peasants. They came from all walks of life: teachers, physicians,
soldiers, CCP cadres, diplomats posted in foreign countries, and other
government officials. More than that, it was reported that among the followers
of
Master Li were the spouses and family members of some of China's top officials,
including President Jiang, Premier Zhu and officials of the State Council, the
executive branch of government."
Falun Gong was part of the explosion of religious activity that appeared in
China
since the 1980s as "part of China's post-Mao 'spiritual vacuum' and the scaling
back of
the Party's ideological control of society..." 2 The popular appeal of Falun
Gong in
particular was based in part on its commitment to integrate modern science with
Chinese traditions.
1 Professor Maria Hsia Chang's book, Falun Gong, published by Yale University,
2004
2 "Falun Gong and Canada's China policy". David Ownby, vol. 56, International
Journal, Canadian Institute
of International Affairs, Spring 2001.
Before Falun Gong was banned in July, 1999, its adherents gathered regularly in
China's myriad cities to do their exercises. As Chang notes, in Beijing alone
there
were more than 2000 practice stations. China's Premier Zhu for one, she adds,
appeared
to be pleased with the rising popularity of Li's movement because its positive
social
consequences included reducing medical costs for practitioners, who were often
healthy. President Jiang himself was reported to have taken up qigong in 1992 by
inviting a member of Zhong Gong, a group which then claimed 38 million members,
to treat him for arthritis and neck pains (By early 2000, however, Jiang's
government
banned Zhong Gong as an "evil sect" and drove its leader out of China.).1
Jiang's personal confrontation with Falun Gong had begun to develop in 1996,
Chang and many other observers conclude, when Li's book, Rotating the Law Wheel,
sold
almost a million copies across China. This alerted nervous party leaders,
including
Jiang, to the growing popularity of the movement. Fearing the possibility of
political
revolt against the government, they banned the sale of China Falun Gong and
others publications and encouraged disgruntled adherents to accuse Li of
stealing from
the public. Chang notes:
"Sensing that he and (Falun Gong) had fallen into disfavour - and reportedly at
the urging of authorities - Li emigrated to the United States in early 1998,
where
he has since acquired permanent residence." 1
The non - violent phase of the campaign continued into May 1998, when a
government television interviewer referred to Falun Gong as a "superstition".
According to
Chang's research, this resulted in about a hundred CCP party, government and
military
retirees, who were adherents of Falun Gong, petitioning Jiang unsuccessfully to
legalize it.
The party later had an article published in a magazine (Science and Technology
for
Youth), which singled out Falun Gong as a superstition and a health risk because
practitioners might refuse conventional medical treatments for serious
illnesses. A large number
of Falun Gong adherents demonstrated peacefully against the contents of the
piece
outside the Tianjin editor's office. When arrests and police beatings resulted,
the
stage was set for another act of protest in the national capital. 1
On April 25th, 1999, 10,000 - 16,000 ordinary Chinese citizens gathered from
dawn
until late at night outside the CCP headquarters at Zhongnanhai next to
Beijing's
Forbidden City. The participants included intellectuals, government officials
and
party members. The protest was silent; there were no posters and not a single
political
slogan or defiant thought was voiced. Chang: "On the day of the demonstration,
(Jiang) asked to be driven around Zhongnanhai in his limousine and stared at the
throng through the tinted windows. That night, clearly alarmed by the
demonstration, he wrote the CCP Politburo to assure his colleagues that he
believed 'Marxism can
triumph over Falun Gong'".1 The CCP's half century of monopolizing power in
China
was suddenly in the personal view of its current leader in grave danger.
David Ownby, Director of the Centre of East Asian studies at the University of
Montreal and a specialist in modern Chinese history, wrote candidly about what
was
occurring in mid-2001 and earlier in a paper prepared five years ago for the
Canadian Institute
of International Affairs.2 Ownby observes that the "seemingly benign nature of
Falungong in North America and its apparently 'evil' character in China might
lead Canadians who are concerned about human rights
to look very carefully at the Chinese case against Falungong," Though Chinese
leaders refer to Falun Gong as a "cult", Ownby notes that "there is little in
their practice in Canada and the US that supports the idea that the group is a
'cult' in the general sense of the word. The Chinese government's
case against Falungong as a 'cult' can not be convincing unless the government
allows third party verification of its allegations of Falungong abuses in China.
China has essentially reacted out of fear of Falungong's ability to mobilize its
followers..."

2) A policy of persecution
If organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners were widespread across China,
one would expect some governmental policy directive to that effect. Yet, the
secrecy of
policy formulation in China prevents us from determining whether such a policy
exists.
Nonetheless, we do know that persecution of Falun Gong exists, as an official
policy.
There are some very strong policy statements, attached as an appendix to this
report, by the Government of China and the Communist Party of China, calling for
the
persecution of the Falun Gong, including physical persecution. These statements
are consistent with the allegations we have heard.
According to Li Baigen, then assistant director of the Beijing Municipal
Planning
office who attended the meeting, during 1999 the three men heading the 610
office
called more than 3000 officials to the Great Hall of the People in the capital
to discuss the
campaign against Falun Gong, which was then not going well. Demonstrations
were continuing to occur around the capital. The head of the 610 office, Li
Lanqing,
verbally announced the government's new policy on the movement: "defaming their
reputations, bankrupting them financially and destroying them physically." It
appears to have been only after this meeting that the deaths of adherents at
police hands
began to be recorded as suicides.
We were told by Falun Gong practitioners in Canada, that many of their members
in China were told by law-enforcement officers in different parts of China that
"death
of Falun Gong members count as suicide, and they will be cremated directly".

3) Incitement to hatred
The Falun Gong in China are dehumanized both in word and deed. Policy directives
are matched by incitement to the population at large both to justify the policy
of
persecution, to recruit participants, and to forestall opposition. This sort of
vocabulary directed against a particular group has become both the precursor and
the hallmark
of gross human violations directed against the group.

According to Amnesty International, the Chinese Government adopted three
strategies to crush Falun Gong: violence against practitioners who refuse to
renounce their
beliefs; "brainwashing" to force all known practitioners to abandon Falun Gong
and
renounce it, and a more effective media campaign to turn public opinion against
Falun Gong.
The media campaign featured an incident on 23 January 2001 when five persons
declared to be Falun Gong practitioners by the government, including a 12
year-old
girl and her mother, purportedly set themselves on fire in Tiananmen Square. The
state
media repeatedly broadcast shocking images of the burning body of the girl and
material aimed at discrediting the group after the incident, reportedly changing
public opinion about Falun Gong. There is considerable concern about whether in
reality
the government staged the entire incident.
Incitement to hatred is not specific enough to indicate the form that
persecution
takes.
But it promotes any and all violations of the worst sort. It is hard to imagine
the
allegations we have heard being true in the absence of this sort of hate
propaganda.
Once this sort of incitement exists, the fact that people would engage in such
behaviour against the Falun Gong - harvesting their organs and killing them in
the process -
ceases to be implausible.

4) Massive Arrests
Despite the media campaign, hundreds of thousands of men and women travelled
to Beijing to protest or to unfold banners calling for the group's legalization
almost
daily. Author Jennifer Zeng, formerly of Beijing and now living in Australia,
confirms that
she managed to acquire classified information that by the end of April 2001
there had
been
3 http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engASA170282001
4 "Few Members of Large Sect to Face Trial, Beijing Says", The New York Times,
December 2, 1999,
http://www.cesnur.org/testi/falun_023.htm or
"Failure admitted in crackdown", South China Morning Post, April 22, 2000 By
Willy Wo-Lap Lam
approximately 830,000 arrests of Falun Gong adherents.
Large numbers of Falun Gong adherents in arbitrary indefinite secret detention
alone do not prove the allegations. But the opposite, the absence of such pool
of detainees,
would undermine the allegations. An extremely large group of people subject to
the
exercise of the whims and power of the state, without recourse to any form of
protection of their rights, provides a potential source for organ harvesting of
the
unwilling.
5) Repression
The crackdown on Falun Gong included President Jiang's creation of a special
force,
the 6-10 office 5 6, in every province, city, county, university, government
department
and government-owned business to spearhead the attack. Jiang's mandate to the
office
was to "eradicate" Falun Gong 6. This included sending thousands upon thousands
of its
practitioners to prisons and labour camps beginning in the summer of 1999. The
US
State Department's 2005 country report on China 7, for example, indicates that
its
police run hundreds of detention centres, with the 340
re-education-through-labour
ones alone having a holding capacity of about 300,000 persons. The report also
indicates that the number of Falun Gong practitioners who died in custody
estimated was from a few hundred to a few thousand.
The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture's recent report 8 noted that
5 Appendix 6, (June 7, 1999) "Comrade Jiang Zemin's speech at the meeting of the
Political Bureau of
CCCCP regarding speeding up the dealing with and settling the problem of 'FALUN
GONG'"
6 H. CON. RES. 188, CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, U.S
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:hc188:
7 U.S. Department of State 2005 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices -
China, March 8, 2006.
(http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61605.htm)
8 U.N. Commission on Human Rights: Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture
and other cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak, on his Mission to China
from November 20 to
December 2, 2005 (E/CN.4/2006/6/Add.6), March 10, 2006.
(http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/chr/docs/62chr/ecn4-2006-6-
Add6.doc )
12 "Since 2000, the Special Rapporteur and his predecessors have reported 314
cases of alleged torture to the Government of China. These cases represent well
over 1,160 individuals." And "In addition to this figure, it is to be noted that
one
case sent in 2003 (E/CN.4/2003/68/Add.1 para. 301) detailed the alleged ill
treatment and torture of thousands of Falun Gong practitioners."
Furthermore, the report indicated that 66% of the victims of alleged torture and
ill-treatment were Falun Gong practitioners, with the remaining victims
comprising
Uyghurs (11%), sex workers (8%), Tibetans (6%), human rights defenders (5%),
political dissidents (2%), and others (persons infected with HIV/AIDS and
members of religious groups 2%).
Local governments everywhere were given unlimited authority to implement
Beijing's orders in 1999 and afterwards. This included numerous staged attempts
later on to
demonstrate to China's population that practitioners committed suicide by
selfimmolation, killed and mutilated family members and refused medical
treatment. Over
time this campaign had the desired effect and many, if not most, Chinese
nationals
clearly came to accept the CCP view about Falun Gong. Only later in 1999 did the
National People's Congress pass new laws targeting Falun Gong retroactively and
purporting to legalize a long list of illegal acts done against its members.
Part of a wire story from the Beijing bureau of the Washington Post fully two
summers later (5 Aug 2001) 9 illustrates the severity of the ongoing methods of
the 6-10
office and other agents of the regime against Falun Gong practitioners:
"At a police station in western Beijing, Ouyang was stripped and interrogated
for
five hours. 'If I responded incorrectly, that is if I didn't say, 'yes,' they
shocked
me with the electric truncheon,' he said. Then, he was transferred to a labour
9 Washington Post Foreign Service, "Torture Is Breaking Falun Gong: China
Systematically Eradicating
Group," John Pomfret and Philip P. Pan, August 5, 2001.
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wpdyn?
pagename=article&node=&contentId=A33055-2001Aug4 )
13 camp in Beijing's western suburbs. There, the guards ordered him to stand
facing a wall. If he moved, they shocked him. If he fell down from fatigue, they
shocked him..."
"(Later) he was taken before a group of Falun Gong inmates and rejected the
group one more time as the video cameras rolled. Ouyang left jail and entered
the brainwashing classes. Twenty days after debating Falun Gong for 16 hours a
day, he 'graduated'. 'The pressure on me was and is incredible,' he said. 'In
the
past two years, I have seen the worst of what man can do. We really are the
worst animals on Earth.'"
Ownby noted that human rights organizations
"have unanimously condemned China's brutal campaign against the Falungong ,
and many governments around the world, including Canada's, have expressed
their concern." He cited Amnesty International's report of 2000 which noted that
77 Falun Gong practitioners had "died in custody, or shortly after release, in
suspicious circumstances since the crackdown began in July 1999." 2
6) The Unidentified and the disappeared
Falun Gong detentions, though in some ways it was just Chinese repression as
usual with the Falun Gong being the unlucky targets, presented an unusual
feature. Falun
Gong practitioners who had come from all over the country to Tiananmen Square in
Beijing to appeal or protest were arrested. Those who revealed their identities
to
their captors would be shipped back to their home localities. Their families
would be
implicated in their Falun Gong activities and pressured to join in the effort to
get the
practitioners to renounce Falun Gong. Their workplace leaders, their co-workers,
their local government leaders would be held responsible and penalized for the
fact that
these individuals had gone to Beijing to appeal or protest.
To protect their families and avoid the hostility of the people in their
locality, many
detained Falun Gong declined to identify themselves. The result was a large
Falun
Gong prison population whose identities the authorities did not know. As well,
no
one who knew them knew where they were.
Though this refusal to identify themselves was done for protection purposes, it
may
have had the opposite effect. It is easier to victimize a person whose
whereabouts
is unknown to family members than a person whose location the family knows. This
population is a remarkably undefended group of people, even by Chinese
standards.
This population of the unidentified was treated especially badly. As well, they
were
moved around within the Chinese prison system for reasons not explained to the
prisoners.
Was this the population which became the source of harvested Falun Gong organs?
Obviously, the mere existence of this population does not tell us that this is
so. Yet,
the existence of this population provides a ready explanation for the source of
harvested organs, if the allegations are true. Members of this population could
just
disappear without anyone outside of the prison system being the wiser.
Information about this population of the unidentified is attached as an appendix
to this report.
In fact, there are many missing Falun Gong practitioners. An appendix to this
report
sets out evidence of these disappearances. If every Falun Gong practitioner were
present and accounted for, the allegations with which we are faced would be
disproved.
But a person can go missing for a variety of reasons. Disappearances are a human
rights violation for which China should be held accountable. But they are not
necessarily this violation.
There is every reason to believe that the Government of China is responsible for
the
disappearance of many Falun Gong practitioners. Those disappearances do not
prove the allegations with which they are faced. But, like many of the other
factors we
considered, they are consistent with those allegations.

7) Sources of transplants
There are many more transplants than identifiable sources. We know that some
organs come from executed prisoners. Very few come from willing donor family
members.
But these sources leave huge gaps in the totals. The number of executed
prisoners
and willing sources come nowhere close to the number of transplants.
The number of executed prisoners is itself not public. We are operating only
from
estimates attached as an appendix. Those estimates, when one considers global
execution totals, are immense, but nowhere near the estimated totals of
transplants.
At least 98% of the organs for transplants come from someone other than family
donors.10 In the case of kidneys, for example, only 227 of 40,393 transplants -
about 0.6% - done between 1971 and 2001 in China came from family donors 11.
Chinese
nationals, for cultural reasons, are reluctant to donate their organs after
death.
There is no organized system of organ donation yet formed in China 12 10.
The government of China admitted to using the organs of executed prisoners only
last year 13 14, although it had been going on for many years. The regime has
had no
10 http://www.transplantation.org.cn/html/2006-04/467.html Life weekly,
2006-04-07
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transplantation.org.cn\
%2Fhtml%2F2006

-04%2F467.html+&x=26&y=11
11 http://www.chinapharm.com.cn/html/xxhc/2002124105954.html China Pharmacy Net,
2002-12-05
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.chinapharm.com.cn/html/xxh\
c/2002124105954.html

12 http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-05/05/content_582847.htm (2006-05-05,
China Daily) English
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/20\
06-05/05/content_582847.htm

13 "China to 'tidy up' trade in executed prisoners' organs," The Times, December
03, 2005
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25689-1901558,00.html
16 barriers to prevent marketing the organs of "enemies of the state".
According to AI's records 15, the average number of executed prisoners between
1995 and 1999 was 1680 per year. The average between 2000 and 2005 was 1616 per
year.
The numbers have bounced around from year to year, but the overall average
number for the periods before and after Falun Gong persecution began is the
same.
Executions cannot explain the increase of organ transplants in China since the
persecution of
Falun Gong began.
According to public reports, there were approximately 30,000 16 transplants in
total
done in China before 1999 and about 18,500 16 17 in the six year period 1994 to
1999. Professor Bingyi Shi, vice-chair of the China Medical Organ Transplant
Association,
says there were about 90,000 18 in total up until 2005, leaving about 60,000 in
the six
yearperiod 2000 to 2005 since the persecution of Falun Gong began.
14 "Beijing Mulls New Law on Transplants of Deathrow Inmate Organs",
http://caijing.hexun.com/english/detail.aspx?issue=147&sl=2488&id=1430379
Caijing Magazine/Issue:147,
Nov 28 2005
15 Index of AI Annual reports: http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aireport/index.html,
from here one can select
annual report of each year.
16 http://www.biotech.org.cn/news/news/show.php?id=864 (China Biotech
Information Net, 2002-12-02)
http://www.chinapharm.com.cn/html/xxhc/2002124105954.html (China Pharmacy Net,
2002-12-05)
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.chinapharm.com.cn/html/xxh\
c/2002124105954.html

http://www.people.com.cn/GB/14739/14740/21474/2766303.html (People's Daily,
2004-09-07, from
Xinhua News Agency)
17 "The Number of Renal Transplant (Asia & the Middle and Near East)1989-2000,"
Medical Net (Japan),
http://www.medi-net.or.jp/tcnet/DATA/renal_a.html
18 http://www.transplantation.org.cn/html/2006-03/394.html (Health Paper Net
2006-03-02)
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transplantation.org.cn\
%2Fhtml%2F2006-03%2F394.html+&x=32&y=11

17
The other identified sources of organ transplants, willing family donors and the
brain dead, have always been tiny. In 2005, living-related kidney transplant
consists of
0.5% of total transplants national wide 19. The total of brain dead donors for
all years and
all of China is 9 up to March 2006 19 20. There is no indication of a
significant increase
in either of these categories in recent years. Presumably the identified sources
of
organ transplants which produced 18,500 organ transplants in the six year period
1994 to
1999 produced the same number of organs for transplants in the next six year
period 2000 to 2005. That means that the source of 41,500 transplants for the
six year
period 2000 to 2005 is unexplained.
Where do the organs come from for the 41,500 transplants? The allegation of
organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners provides an answer.
Again this sort of gap in the figures does not establish that the allegation of
harvesting of organs from Falun Gong practitioners is true. But the converse, a
full explanation
of the source of all organ transplants, would disprove the allegation. If the
source of
all organ transplants could be traced either to willing donors or executed
prisoners,
then the allegation aboutt the Falun Gong would be disproved. But such tracing
is
impossible.
Estimates of the executions of China are often much higher than the figures
based
on publicly available records of executions. There is no official Chinese
reporting on
overall statistics of executions, leaving totals open to estimation.
One technique some of those involved in estimating executions have used is the
19 "CURRENT SITUATION OF ORGAN DONATION IN CHINA FROM STIGMA TO
STIGMATA", Abstract, The World Transplant Congress,
http://www.abstracts2view.com/wtc/
Zhonghua K Chen, Fanjun Zeng, Changsheng Ming, Junjie Ma, Jipin Jiang. Institute
of Organ
Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, HUST, Wuhan, China.
http://www.abstracts2view.com/wtc/view.php?nu=WTC06L_1100&terms=
20 http://www.transplantation.org.cn/html/2006-03/400.html , (Beijing Youth
Daily, 2006-03-06)
18
number of transplant operations. Because it is known that at least some
transplants
come from executed prisoners and that family donors are few and far between,
some analysts have deduced from the number of transplants that executions have
increased.
This reasoning is unpersuasive. One cannot estimate executions from transplants
unless executions are the only alleged source of transplants. Yet, Falun Gong
practitioners are another alleged source. It is impossible to conclude that
those
practitioners are not a source of organs for transplants because of the number
of
executions where the number of executions is deduced from the number of
transplants.
There appeared to be only 22 21 liver transplant centres operating across China
before 1999, compared to fully 500 in mid - April, 2006 22 12. The number of
liver
transplant operations in all of China appeared to total 135 by 1998 11,
contrasted with more
than 4000 18 in 2005 alone. For kidneys, the pattern is also significant (3,596
11
transplants in 1998 and nearly 10,000 18 in 2005).
The increase in organ transplants in China parallels the increase in persecution
of
the Falun Gong. These parallel increases, in themselves, do not prove the
allegation.
But they are consistent with the allegation. If the parallel did not exist, that
hypothetical
non-existence would undercut the allegations.
8) Blood testing
We know that Falun Gong practitioners in detention are systematically blood
tested.
21 http://unn.people.com.cn/GB/channel413/417/1100/1131/200010/17/1857.html
(People's Daily Net and Union News Net, 2000-10-17). Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://unn.people.com.cn/GB/channel41\
3/417/1100/1131/200010/17/157.html

22 According to Deputy Minister of Health, Mr. Huang Jiefu,
http://www.transplantation.org.cn/html/2006-04/467.html (Lifeweekly,
2006-04-07). Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transplantation.org.cn\
%2Fhtml%2F2006-04%2F467.html+&x=26&y=11

19
We have heard such a number of testimonials to that effect that this testing
exists
beyond a shadow of a doubt. Why is it happening?
The practitioners themselves are not told. It is unlikely that the testing
serves a
health purpose. For one, it is unnecessary to blood test people systematically
simply as a
health precaution. For another, the health of the Falun Gong in detention is
disregarded in so many other ways. it is implausible that the authorities would
blood test Falun Gong as a precautionary health measure.
Blood testing is a pre-requisite for organ transplants. Donors need to be
matched
with recipients so that the antibodies of the recipients do not reject the
organs of the
donors.
The mere fact of blood testing does not establish that organ harvesting of Falun
Gong practitioners is taking place. But the opposite is true. If there were no
blood testing,
the allegation would be disproved. The widespread blood testing of Falun Gong
practitioners in detention cuts off this avenue of disproof.
9) Corpses with missing organs
A number of family members of Falun Gong practitioners who died in detention
reported seeing the corpses of their loved ones with surgical incisions and body
parts missing. The authorities gave no coherent explanation for these mutilated
corpses.
Again the evidence about these mutilated corpses is attached as an appendix to
this
report.
We have only a few instances of such mutilated corpses. We have no official
explanation why they were mutilated. Their mutilation is consistent with organ
harvesting. We cannot even guess otherwise why these corpses would have been
mutilated and body parts removed.
20
10) A confession
We met one witness who said that her surgeon husband told her that he personally
removed the corneas from approximately 2,000 anaesthetized Falun Gong
prisoners in
northeast China during the two year period before October, 2003, at which time
he
refused to continue. The surgeon made it clear to his wife that none of the
cornea
"donors" survived the experience because other surgeons removed other vital
organs
and all of their bodies were then burned. The woman is not a Falun Gong
practitioner.
This confession is second hand. The women is not confessing something she did.
Rather she is relating a terrible admission her husband made to her.
The statement of this witness needs to be assessed for its credibility,
something
this report does later. Here we can say that, if it can be believed, it
establishes all on its
own the allegation.
11) Admissions
One of us has listened with a certified Mandarin-English interpreter to the
cited
recorded telephone conversations between officials and callers on behalf of the
Falun Gong communities in Canada and the United States. Certified copies of the
relevant
transcripts in Mandarin and English were provided to us. The accuracy of the
translations of the portions of them used in this report is attested to by the
certified
translator, Mr. C. Y., a certified interpreter with the Government of Ontario.
He
certified that he had listened to the recording of the conversations referred to
in this report
and has read the transcripts in Chinese and the translated English version of
the
conversations, and verifies that the transcripts are correct and translations
accurate.
The original recordings of the calls remain available as well. One of us met
with two
of the callers in Toronto on May 27th to discuss the routing, timing, recording,
accuracy of the translations from Mandarin to English and other features of the
calls.
One of the callers, "Ms. M", who will not be identified to avoid risk of harm to
family
21
members still in China and will be referred to hereafter as M, told one of us
that in
early March, 2006 she managed to get through to the Public Security Bureau in
Shanxi.
The respondent there told her that healthy and young prisoners are selected from
the
prison population to be organ donors. If the candidates could not be tricked
into
providing the blood samples necessary for successful transplants, the official
went
on with guileless candour, employees of the office take the samples by force.
On March 18 or 19, 2006 M spoke to a representative of the Eye Department at the
People's Liberation Army hospital in Shenyang in north-eastern China, although
she
was not able to make a full recorded transcript. Her notes indicate that the
person
identifying himself as the department's Chief-Physician said the facility did
"many
cornea operations", adding that "we also have fresh corneas." Asked what that
means, the Chief-Physician replied "...just taken from bodies".
At Army Hospital 301 in Beijing in April, 2006, a surgeon, who told M that she
did
liver transplants herself, added that the source of the organs was a "state
secret" and
that anyone revealing the source "could be disqualified from doing such
operations."
The second investigator for the World Organization to Investigate the
Persecution
of Falun Gong placed her calls from within the continental United States and
will
hereafter be referred to as N. N telephoned approximately thirty hospitals,
detention centres and courts across China and recorded a number of them
admitting to the
use of organs from Falun Gong practitioners. Her methods, translations and so on
were
noted by the one of us who met with her in Toronto on May 27th to have been done
on
a virtually identical basis as M and are thus accepted by both of us as
accurately
representing what was said over the telephone. The same accredited translator
worked on the texts of her recorded conversations.
Hospitals and Detention Centres Admissions in Telephone
22
Conversations
FALUN GONG ORGANS ARE STILL READILY AVAILABLE
Admission from Mishan Detention Centre:
On June 8, 2006, an official at the Mishan city detention centre, Heilongjiang
Province admitted that the centre then had at least five or six male Falun Gong
prisoners under 40 years-of-age available as organ suppliers. Mr. Li of the
centre
also gave details of the operation of selecting Falun Gong prisoners as organ
suppliers for hospitals:
1. This particular detention centre at the time picked the organ suppliers, not
the
hospital.
2. Chief-Physician Cui of the detention centre at the time of the conversation
was
the point of contact for organ suppliers.
3. Blood will be drawn from the prisoners picked to become organ suppliers, and
such prisoners do not know the purpose of the blood test.
4. the detention centre has various means of obtaining blood samples from
reluctant "donors".
Shanghai's Zhongshan hospital:
A doctor at this hospital in mid-March of this year said that all of his organs
come from Falun Gong practitioners.
Qianfoshan hospital in Shandong:
A doctor at this hospital in March implied that he then had organs from Falun
Gong persons and added that in April there would be "more of these kinds of
bodies..."
Minzu hospital in Nanning city:
In May, Dr Lu of this hospital said organs from Falun Gong practitioners were
not available at his institution and suggested the caller call Guangzhou to get
23
them. He also admitted that he earlier went to prisons to select healthy Falun
Gong persons in their 30s to provide their organs.
Zhengzhou Medical University in Henan province:
In mid-March of this year, Dr Wang of this centre agreed that "we pick all the
young and healthy kidneys..."
Guangzhou Military region hospital:
Dr Zhu of this hospital in April of this year said he then had some type B
kidneys
from Falun Gong, but would have "several batches" before May 1 and perhaps
no more until May 20 or later.
Oriental Organ Transplant Centre:
Chief-Physician Song at this centre in mid-March this year volunteered that his
hospital had more than ten "beating hearts". The caller asked if that meant
"live
bodies" and Song replied, "Yes it is so."
Wuhan city Tongji hospital:
An official at this hospital two weeks later told the caller that "(i)t's not a
problem" for his institution when the caller said, "...we hope the kidney
suppliers are alive. (We're) looking for live organ transplants from prisoners,
for
example, using living bodies from prisoners who practise Falun Gong, Is it
possible?"
Detention Centres and Courts:
First Detention Centre of Qinhuangdao City
An official at this centre told the caller in mid-May this year that she should
call
the Intermediate People's court to obtain Falun Gong kidneys.
24
Intermediate People's court
The same day, an official at the Intermediate People's court said they had no
Falun Gong live kidneys, but had had them in the past, specifically in 2001.
First Criminal Bureau of the Jinzhou people's court
In May of this year, an official in the court told the caller that access to
Falun
Gong kidneys currently depended on "qualifications" of the organ seekers.
The map of China which follows indicates the regions where detention or hospital
personnel have made admissions to telephone investigators:
Most of the excerpted phone call texts are in an appendix. For illustration
purposes,
25
excerpts of three conversations follow:
(1)Mishan City Detention Centre, Heilongjiang province (8 June 2006):
M: "Do you have Falun Gong [organ] suppliers? ..."
Li: "We used to have, yes."
M: "... what about now?"
Li: "... Yes."
...
M: "Can we come to select, or you provide directly to us?"
Li: "We provide them to you."
M: "What about the price?"
Li: "We discuss after you come."
...
M: "... How many [Falun Gong suppliers] under age 40 do you have?"
Li: "Quite a few."
...
M: "Are they male or female?"
Li: "Male"
...
M: "Now, for ... the male Falun Gong [prisoners], How many of them do you
have?"
Li: "Seven, eight, we have [at least] five, six now."
M: "Are they from countryside or from the city?"
Li: "countryside."
(2) Nanning City Minzu Hospital in Guangxi Autonomous Region
(22 May 2006):
M: "...Could you find organs from Falun Gong practitioners?"
26
Dr. Lu: "Let me tell you, we have no way to get (them). It's rather difficult to
get
it now in Guangxi. If you cannot wait, I suggest you go to Guangzhou
because it's very easy for them to get the organs. They are able to look
for (them) nation wide. As they are performing the liver transplant, they
can get the kidney for you at the same time, so it's very easy for them to
do. Many places where supplies are short go to them for help..."
M: "Why is it easy for them to get?"
Lu: "Because they are an important institution. They contact the (judicial)
system in the name of the whole university."
M: "Then they use organs from Falun Gong practitioners?"
Lu: "Correct..."
M: "...what you used before (organs from Falun Gong practitioners), was it
from detention centre(s) or prison(s)?"
Lu: "From prisons."
M: "...and it was from healthy Falun Gong practitioners...?"
Lu: "Correct. We would choose the good ones because we assure the quality
in our operation."
M: "That means you choose the organs yourself."
Lu: "Correct..."
M: "Usually, how old is the organ supplier?"
Lu: "Usually in their thirties."
M: "... Then you will go to the prison to select yourself?"
Lu: "Correct. We must select it."
M: "What if the chosen one doesn't want to have blood drawn?"
Lu: "He will for sure let us do it."
M: "How?"
Lu: "They will for sure find a way. What do you worry about? These kinds of
things should not be of any concern to you. They have their procedures."
M: "Does the person know that his organ will be removed?"
Lu: "No, he doesn't."
27
(3) Oriental Organ Transplant Centre (also called Tianjin City No 1 Central
Hospital),Tianjin City, (15 March 2006):
N: Is this Chief-Physician Song?"
Song: Yes, please speak."
...
N: Her doctor told her that the kidney is quite good because he [the
supplier,] practises ...Falun Gong."
Song: "Of course. We have all those who breathe and with heart beat...Up until
now, for this year, we have more than ten kidneys, more than ten such
kidneys."
N: "More than ten of this kind of kidneys? You mean live bodies?"
Song: "Yes it is so."
12) Waiting times
Hospital web sites in China advertise short waiting times for organ transplants.
Transplants of long dead donors are not viable because of organ deterioration
after
death. If we take these hospital's self-promotions at face value, they tell us
that
there
are a number of people now alive who are available almost on demand as sources
of
organs.
The wait times for organ transplants for organ recipients in China appear to be
much
lower than anywhere else. The China International Transplantation Assistant
Centre
website says, "It may take only one week to find out the suitable (kidney)
donor,
the
maximum time being one month..." 23. It goes further, "If something wrong with
the
23 http://en.zoukiishoku.com/list/qa2.htm
Archived page:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Fqa2.htm&x=1

9&y=11
28
donor's organ happens, the patient will have the option to be offered another
organ
donor and have the operation again in one week." 24 The site of the Oriental
Organ
Transplant Centre in early April, 2006, claimed that "the average waiting time
(for
a
suitable liver) is 2 weeks." 25 The website of the Changzheng Hospital in
Shanghai
says:
"...the average waiting time for a liver supply is one week among all the
patients"
26.
In contrast, the median waiting time in Canada was 32.5 months in 2003 and in
British
Columbia it was even longer at 52.5 months 27. If as indicated the survival
period
for a
kidney is between 24-48 hours and a liver about 12 hours 28, the presence of a
large
bank of living kidney-liver "donors" must be the only way China's transplant
centres
can
assure such short waits to customers. The astonishingly short waiting times
advertised
for perfectly- matched organs would suggest the existence of both a computer
matching system for transplants and a large bank of live prospective 'donors'.
The advertisements do not identify Falun Gong practitioners as the source of
these
organs. But there are no other identified sources. Even if the Falun Gong as the
sources of these organs is only an allegation, it is the only allegation we
have. No
other large body of people now alive have been identified to us as sources of
organs
sufficient in numbers to meet the large number of transplant demands now being
made
and met in China.
24 http://en.zoukiishoku.com/list/volunteer.htm Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Fvolunteer.htm

+&x=8&
y=9
25 The front page has been altered. The archived page is at:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.ootc.net/special_images/oo\
tc1.png

26 http://www.transorgan.com/apply.asp Archived at :
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transorgan.com%2Fapply\
.asp&x=15&y

=8
27 Canadian Organ Replacement Register, Canadian Institute for Health
Information,
(http://www.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/CORR-CST2005_Gill-rev_July22_2005.ppt),
July 2005
28 Donor Matching System, The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network
(OPTN)
http://www.optn.org/about/transplantation/matchingProcess.asp
29
13) Incriminating Information on Websites
Some of the material available on the websites of various transplant centres in
China
before March 9, 2006 (when allegations about large-scale organ seizures
resurfaced in
Canadian and other world media) is also inculpatory. Understandably, a good deal
of it
has since been removed. So these comments will refer only to sites that can
still be
found at archived locations, with the site locations being identified either in
the
comments or as footnotes. A surprising amount of self-accusatory material is
still
available as of the final week of June, 2006 to web browsers. We list here only
four
examples:
(1) China International Transplantation Network Assistance Centre Website
(http://en.zoukiishoku.com/ )
(Shenyang City)
This website as of May 17, 2006 indicated in the English version (the Mandarin
one
evidently disappeared after March 9) that the centre was established in 2003 at
the
First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University "...specifically for
foreign
friends.
Most of the patients are from all over the world." The opening sentence of the
site
29
introduction declares that "Viscera (one dictionary definition: "soft interior
organs...including the brain, lungs, heart etc") providers can be found
immediately!"
On another page 30 on the same site is this statement: "...the number of kidney
transplant operations is at least 5,000 every year all over the country. So many
transplantation operations are owing to the support of the Chinese government.
The
29 The original page has been altered. Older versions with that specific
statement can still be found at Internet
Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20050305122521/http://en.zoukiishoku.com/
30 http://en.zoukiishoku.com/list/facts.htm
or use archived version at:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Ffacts.htm&x=

24&y=1
2
30
supreme demotic court, supreme demotic law - officer, police, judiciary,
department of
health and civil administration have enacted a law together to make sure that
organ
donations are supported by the government. This is unique in the world."
In the 'question and answer' section of the site are found:
"Before the living kidney transplantation, we will ensure the donor's renal
function...So
it is more safe than in other countries, where the organ is not from a living
donor."
31
. "Q: Are the organs for the pancreas transplant(ed) from brain death (sic)
(dead)
patients?"
"A: Our organs do not come from brain death victims because the state of the
organ may not be good." 32
(2)Orient Organ Transplant Centre Website
(http://www.ootc.net )
(Tianjin City)
On a page which we were informed was changed in mid-April (but can still be
viewed
as an archive 25) is the claim that from "January 2005 to now, we have done 647
liver
transplants - 12 of them done this week; the average waiting time is 2 weeks." A
chart
also removed about the same time (but archive still available 33) indicates that
from
virtually a standing start in 1998 (when it managed only 9 liver transplants) by
2005
it
had completed fully 2248 34.
31 http://en.zoukiishoku.com/list/qa.htm or use archived version:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Fqa.htm&x=27

&y=10
32 http://en.zoukiishoku.com/list/qa7.htm or use archived version:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Fqa7.htm&x=3

5&y=10
33 The front page has been altered. Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.ootc.net/special_images/oo\
ct_achievement.jpg

http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.ootc.net/special_images/oo\
tc2.png

34 The front page has been altered. Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.ootc.net/special_images/oo\
ct_case.jpg

http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://www.ootc.net/special_images/oo\
tc1.png

31
In contrast, according to the Canadian Organ Replacement Register 27, the total
in
Canada for all kinds of organ transplants in 2004 was 1773.
(3)Jiaotang University Hospital Liver Transplant Centre Website
(http://www.firsthospital.cn/hospital/index.asp )
(Shanghai)
In a posting on April 26, 2006 35, the sohu website says in part: "The liver
transplant
cases (here) are seven in 2001, 53 cases in 2002, 105 cases in 2003, 144 cases
in
2004, 147 cases in 2005 and 17 cases in January, 2006," .
(4) Website of Changzheng Hospital Organ Transplant Centre, affiliated with No.
2
Military Medical University
(http://www.transorgan.com/)
(Shanghai)
A page was removed after March 9, 2006. (Internet Archive page is available 36.)
It
contains the following graph depicting the number of liver transplant each year
by
this
Centre:
35 http://www.health.sohu.com/20060426/n243015842.shtml Archived at:
http://archive.edoors.com/content5.php?uri=http://health.sohu.com/52/81/harticle\
15198152.shtml

36 The URL of the removed page as of March 2005 in the Internet Archive is
http://web.archive.org/web/20050317130117/http://www.transorgan.com/about_g_intr\
o.asp

32
In the "Liver Transplant Application" form 37, it states on the top,
"...Currently, for
the
liver transplant, the operation fee and the hospitalisation expense together is
about
200,000 yuan ($66,667 CND), and the average waiting time for a liver supply is
one
week among all the patients in our hospital...."
14) Victim interviews
We conducted a number of interviews with victims of Falun Gong repression in
China
who now reside in Canada. These interviews revealed activities by the
authorities
which, while inconclusive in isolation, in context with everything else we
considered,
were corroborative and consistent with the allegations.
(1) Ms. Yuzhi Wang, Vancouver
One of us met with the Ms. Wang in Toronto on May 27th at a location at the
University
of Toronto and heard her deeply disturbing personal history. For being a Falun
Gong
practitioner and therefore suddenly "an enemy of the people" only as of
mid-1999,
she
spent most of her time between 2000 and the end of 2001 in labour camps, with
20-50
37 http://www.transorgan.com/apply.asp , Archived at :
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transorgan.com%2Fapply\
.asp&x=15&y

=8
33
persons squeezed into a cell of approximately 15 square metres. By late 2001,
near
death from various forms of torture over a lengthy period for refusing to give
up her
beliefs, she was sent to hospital for "treatment", which included approximately
three
months of forced feeding after she began a hunger strike in desperation and more
beatings by thugs from the 6-10 office.
In Harbin, Wang was examined thoroughly at several hospitals, and the examining
doctors indicated that she had organ damage. Later, when she overheard a doctor
say
that she would not recover, the 610 office personnel "suddenly lost interest in
me
and I
(eventually) managed to escape from the hospital." When in time her health
recovered, she found a way to relocate to a country in the Middle East, but even
there
6-10 agents attempted to kidnap her because she was criticizing the Jiang regime
to
tourists visiting there from China. Wang gives much credit to Canadian
immigration
officials there for intervening and enabling her to come to Canada as a refugee.
She
is
convinced that she survived only because her captors in Harbin concluded they
could
not profit by selling her organs, which they concluded were damaged by their
"treatments".
(2) Mr. Xiaohua Wang, Montreal
On meeting Mr. Wang on May 27th, he provided a detailed statement of his periods
of
persecution by officials during 2001 and 2002. It began when police arrested him
at
a
Kunming city design institute where he worked as an engineer, ransacked his
home,
stole his computer, and took him to prison. His wife and two-year-old child
could
only
scream at the departing police vehicle. In jail, he was beaten into
unconsciousness
by
long term inmates on the order of the warden, whose constant mantra was,
"Beating is
the only way to treat (Falun Gong)".
Wang was later transferred to the local "brainwashing centre". When released, he
fled
to a distant region of the country without his family, where he found work until
he
was
34
again arrested as one of the 6-10 office's "most wanted criminals". He ended up
at
the
Yunnan forced labour camp #2, which manufactures artificial gems and crystals
for
export through the application of chromium oxide in the manufacturing process.
For
refusing to recant his Falun Gong beliefs, Wang was kept there for almost two
years.
His hair turned gray from the constant exposure to the chemical and 16-hour work
days.
In January, 2002, the local hospital did a comprehensive physical examination on
every
Falun Gong prisoner, including an electrocardiogram, whole body x-ray, liver,
blood
and
kidney test. Beforehand, he was told by the police: "The Communist party cares
about
you so much. They want to transform Falun Gong at all costs." Little knowing the
probable real purpose of the tests at the time, he cooperated. Miraculously, he
managed to get out of China and get to Canada in early 2005. He also praises
Canadian
immigration officials for getting him and his family out speedily.
(3) Ms. Na Gan, Toronto
Ms Gan worked as a customs officer at the Beijing International Airport for 11
years
until mid-July, 1999, when she and five other Falun Gong practitioners attempted
to
avail themselves of each citizen's specified constitutional right to petition at
a
designated location near the CCP headquarters in central Beijing. Police beat
the
group
and dragged all of them into waiting buses. Thereafter, she was incarcerated on
five
further occasions because she refused to renounce Falun Gong. When a
psychiatrist
examined her in a hospital and pronounced her mentally fit, the police still
kept her
in a
locked room there for eight days with patients who were screaming. When she
later
unfurled a banner in Tiananmen Square, saying
"truthfulness-compassion-tolerance",
she was kicked by police. Back in custody, she was beaten by other prisoners at
the
direction of officials and forced to stand for hours in the snow without an
overcoat.
In March, 2000, the banner incident got her a one year sentence under house
arrest,
35
expulsion from the Communist party, and termination of her salary. By the year's
end,
she was back in a crowded cell with mostly Falun Gong adherents. When she
refused to
read aloud an article defaming Falun Gong, a policeman kicked her in the head
repeatedly. She was next moved to the Beijing women's labour camp, where the
treatment was so severe that she finally signed a pledge to renounce Falun Gong.
She
managed to leave China for Canada as an immigrant from fear of further
persecution in
May, 2004 but without her husband and daughter.
Gan's observations relative to organ harvesting are probably inconclusive.
Numerous
Falun Gong prisoners with her in detention in Beijing - some cells holding as
many
as
30 women - were identified by four digit numbers only. One night, she was
awakened
by noises, only to find the next morning that some of the numbered inmates had
been
dragged from their cells and never returned. One cannot fairly conclude the
worst
here
without knowing more. For five months in mid-2001, she was part of forced labour
team of approximately 130 mostly female Falun Gong prisoners. Only the Falun
Gong
members in the group were taken by soldiers to a nearby police hospital for
blood
and
urine tests, x-rays, and eye examinations. This medical attention seemed to her
at
the
time completely out of character with everything else experienced at the camp.
Only
later did she learn about the organ harvesting going occurring across China.
15) Human rights violations generally
Falun Gong are not the only victims of human rights violations in China. It is
incontestable that the organs of prisoners sentenced to death are harvested
after
execution.
Besides Falun Gong, other prime targets of human rights violations are Tibetans,
Christians, Uighurs, democracy activists and human rights defenders. Rule of Law
mechanisms in place to prevent human rights violations, such as an independent
judiciary, access to counsel on detention, habeas corpus, the right to public
trial,
are
glaringly absent in China. China, according to its constitution, is ruled by the
36
Communist Party. It is not ruled by law.
This overall pattern of human rights violations, like many other factors, does
not in
itself prove the allegations. But it removes an element of disproof. It is
impossible
to
say of these allegations that it is out of step with an overall pattern of
respect for
human rights in China. While the allegations, in themselves, are surprising,
they are
less surprising with a country that has the human rights record China than they
would
be for many other countries.
16) Financial considerations
In China, organ transplanting is a very profitable business. We can trace the
money
of
the people who pay for organ transplants to specific hospitals which do organ
transplants, but we can not go further than that. We do not know who gets the
money
the hospitals receive. Are doctors and nurses engaged in criminal organ
harvesting
paid exorbitant sums for their crimes? That was a question it was impossible for
us
to
answer, since we had no way of knowing where the money went.
China International Transplantation Network Assistance Centre Website
(http://en.zoukiishoku.com/ )
(Shenyang City)
Before its indicated removal from the site 38 in April, 2006, the size of the
profits for
transplants was suggested in the following price list:
Kidney US$62,000
Liver US$98,000-130,000
Liver-kidney US$160,000-180,000
Kidney-pancreas US$150,000
38 Yet, one can still go to the Internet Archive to find the information on this
website from March 2006:
http://archive.edoors.com/render.php?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fen.zoukiishoku.com%2Flist%\
2Fcost.htm+&x=

16&y=1
1
37
Lung US$150,000-170,000
Heart US$130,000-160,000
Cornea US$30,000
A standard way of investigating any crime allegation where money changes hands
is to
follow the money trail. But for China, its closed doors means that following the
money
trail is impossible. Not knowing where the money goes proves nothing. But it
also
disproves nothing, including these allegations.
17) Corruption
Corruption is a major problem across China. State institutions are sometimes run
for
the benefit of those in charge of them, rather than for the benefit of the
people.
Military hospitals across the country operate independently from the Ministry of
Health
and, while the figures for their organ transplants are secret, we understand
they
are
large. Trafficking in Falun Gong vital organs would be consistent with the
numerous
other commercial activities on the part of the Chinese army, especially in the
years
up
until 2004 while Jiang was chairman of the country's Military Commission.
The widespread corruption of official Chinese institutions raises the question
whether
the harvesting of Falun Gong organs for transplants, if it does occur, happens
as
the
result of official policy or as the result of the profiteering of individual
hospitals,
taking
advantage of the defenceless of a captive Falun Gong population in their
regions.
The
policy of repression of the Falun Gong means that they are in prison without
rights,
at
the disposition of corrupt authorities. The incitement to hatred against the
Falun
Gong
and their dehumanization means that they can be butchered and killed without
qualms
by those who buy into this official hate propaganda.
Whether the harvesting of Falun Gong organs, if it does occur, happens as the
result of
official policy or unofficial corruption, is for us difficult to be absolutely
certain
about.
38
Chinese officials, in theory in charge of the country, sometimes have
substantial
difficulty in determining whether corruption exists, let alone how to put an end
to it.
For us, on the outside, it is easier to form a conclusion on the result, whether
or not
the
alleged organ harvesting occurs, than to determine whether this practice, if it
exists,
is
the result of policy or corruption.
18) Legislation
China in March enacted legislation to take effect July 1 to ban sales of human
organs
and require that donors give written permission for their organs to be
transplanted.
The legislation is titled a "temporary regulation." The rules further limit
transplant
surgery to certain institutions. These institutions must verify that the organs
are
from
legal sources. Hospital transplant ethics committees must approve all
transplants in
advance.
This legislation is welcome. Yet, its very enactment highlights the fact that
there is
no
such legislation in place now, the lawlessness now enveloping organ transplants.
This
very lawless, again, though it does not prove the allegations, removes a
possible
element of disproof. The absence of any legal constraints on organ transplants
in
China makes the allegations on which this report focusses easier to accept.
Up to July 1st, Chinese law has allowed the buying and selling of organs.
Chinese
law
has not required that donors give written permission for their organs to be
transplanted. There have been no restriction on the institutions which could
engage
in
organ harvesting or transplants. Until July 1, there was no requirement that the
institutions engaged in transplants had to verify that the organs being
transplanted
were from legal sources. There was no obligation to have transplant ethics
committees
approve all transplants in advance.
As well, the fact that the legislation came into force on July 1 does not mean
that
the
problem, if it existed, has ceased to exist since that date. In China, there is
a large
39
step between the enactment of legislation and its implementation.
To take an obvious example, the 1982 Constitution of China provides that the
people of
China will turn China into a country with a high level of democracy. We are now
twenty
four years from the enactment of that commitment to democracy. Yet China is far
from
democratic.
The mere fact that China now has in force organ transplant legislation does not
mean,
in itself, that the legislation is implemented. Indeed, the overall record of
China in
implementing new legislation is such that the old practices for organ
transplants,
whatever they may happen to be, are likely to continue, at least in some places
in
China, for quite some time.
G. Credibility
We conclude that the verbal admissions in the transcripts of interviews of
investigators
can be trusted. There is no doubt in our minds that these interviews did take
place
with
the persons claimed to be interviewed at the time and place indicated and that
the
transcripts accurately reflect what was said.
Moreover, the content of what was said can itself be believed. For one, when
weighed
against the recent international uproar about alleged organ seizures as the 2008
Beijing
Olympics approach, the admissions made at the various institutions are contrary
to
the
reputational interests of the government of China in attempting to convince the
international community that the widespread killing of Falun Gong prisoners for
their
vital organs has not occurred.
The testimony of the wife of the surgeon allegedly complicit in Falun Gong organ
harvesting seemed credible to us, partly because of its extreme detail. However,
that
detail also posed a problem for us, because it provided a good deal of
information
40
which it was impossible to corroborate independently. We were reluctant to base
our
findings on sole source information. So, in the end, we relied on the testimony
of
this
witness only where it was corroborative and consistent with other evidence,
rather
than
as sole source information.
In the course of our work, we have come across a number of people sceptical of
the
allegations. This scepticism has a number of different causes. Some of the
scepticism
reminds of the statement of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter 1943 to
a
Polish diplomat in reaction to being told by Jan Karski about the Holocaust.
Frankfurter
said:
"I did not say that this young man was lying. I said that I was unable to
believe
what he told me. There is a difference."
The allegations here are so shocking that they are almost impossible to believe.
The
allegations, if true, would represent a grotesque form of evil which, despite
all the
depravations humanity has seen, would be new to this planet. The very horror
makes
us reel back in disbelief. But that disbelief does not mean that the allegations
are
untrue.
H. Further Research
Obviously, this report is not the final word on this subject. There is much that
we
ourselves, given the opportunity, would rather do before we completed the
report.
But
it would mean pursuing avenues of investigation which are not now open to us. We
will welcome any comments on its contents or any additional information
individuals or
governments might be willing to provide.
We would like to see Chinese hospital records of transplants. Are there consents
on
file? Are there records of sources of organs?
Donors can survive many forms of transplant operations. No one can survive a
full
liver
41
or heart donation. But kidney donations are normally not fatal. Where are the
surviving donors? We would like to do a random sampling of donations to see if
we
could locate the donors.
Family members of deceased donors should either know of the consents of the
donors.
Alternatively, the family members should have given the consents themselves.
Here,
too, we would like to do a random sampling of immediate family members of
deceased
donors to see if the families either consented themselves to the donations or
were
aware of the consent of the donor.
China has engaged in a major expansion of organ transplant facilities in recent
years.
This expansion likely would have been accompanied by feasibility studies
indicating
organ sources. We would like to see these feasibility studies.
Ideally, we would like to pursue further research before we come to any firm
conclusions. But the very willingness to engage in further research may require
the
forming of tentative conclusions. If we could decide now that there is nothing
in the
allegations, we might well further conclude that additional research would be
pointless.
I. Conclusions
Based on what we now know, we have come to the regrettable conclusion that the
allegations are true. We believe that there has been and continues today to be
large
scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners.
We have concluded that the government of China and its agencies in numerous
parts of
the country, in particular hospitals but also detention centres and 'people's
courts',
since 1999 have put to death a large but unknown number of Falun Gong prisoners
of
conscience. Their vital organs, including hearts, kidneys, livers and corneas,
were
virtually simultaneously seized involuntarily for sale at high prices, sometimes
to
42
foreigners, who normally face long waits for voluntary donations of such organs
in
their
home countries.
How many of the victims were first convicted of any offence, serious or
otherwise,
in
legitimate courts, we are unable to estimate because such information appears to
be
unavailable both to Chinese nationals and foreigners. It appears to us that many
human beings belonging to a peaceful voluntary organization made illegal seven
years
ago by President Jiang because he thought it might threaten the dominance of the
Communist Party of China have been in effect executed by medical practitioners
for
their organs.
Our conclusion comes not from any one single item of evidence, but rather the
piecing
together of all the evidence we have considered. Each portion of the evidence we
have
considered is, in itself, verifiable and, in most cases, incontestable. Put
together,
they
paint a damning whole picture. It is their combination that has convinced us.
J. Recommendations
1) It goes without saying that the harvesting of organs of unwilling Falun Gong
practitioners, if it is happening, as we believe it is, should cease.
2) Organ harvesting of unwilling donors where it is either systematic or
widespread
is a
crime against humanity. We are not in a position, with the resources and
information
at our disposal, to conduct a criminal investigation. Criminal authorities in
China
should
investigate the allegation for possible prosecution.
3) Governmental, non-governmental and inter-governmental human rights
organizations with far better investigative capacity than ours should take these
allegations seriously and make their own determinations whether or not they are
true.
4) Article 3 of the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish
Trafficking
43
in Persons, bans, among other practices,... the removal of organs. Governments
should
request the relevant agency of the UN (we would suggest the UN Committee
Against
Torture and the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture), to investigate if the
government of
China has engaged in, or is engaging in now, in violations of any of the terms
of
Article
3. If so, the necessary steps to seek a remedy should be initiated with
deliberate
haste.
5) Until the Chinese law on organ transplants is effectively implemented,
foreign
governments should not issue visas to doctors from China seeking to travel
abroad
for
the purpose of training in organ or bodily issue transplantation. Any doctor in
China
known to be involved in trafficking in the organs of prisoners should be barred
entry
by
all foreign countries permanently.
6) All states should strengthen their laws against the crime of trafficking in
organs.
The
laws should require doctors to report to the authorities of their country any
evidence
suggesting that a patient has obtained an organ from a trafficked person abroad,
defined to include persons in detention abroad.
7) All should prevent and, at the very least, discourage their nationals from
obtaining
organ transplants in China until the Chinese law on organ transplants is
rigorously
implemented. States should, if necessary, deny passports or revoke passports of
those
who are travelling to China for organ transplants.
8) Until the international community is satisfied that the new Chinese law on
organ
transplants is effectively implemented, foreign funding agencies, medical
organizations
and individual health professionals should not participate in any Government of
China-sponsored organ transplant research or meetings. Foreign companies which
currently provide goods and services to China's organ transplant programs should
cease
and desist immediately until the government of China can demonstrate that their
law
on organ transplants is effective.
44
9) The current form of dialogue between Canada and China over human rights
should
cease. Canadian political scientist and former diplomat Charles Burton recently
declared
the dialogue a charade. In hindsight, the Government erred in agreeing to the
talk
fests
in exchange for Canada no longer co-sponsoring the yearly motion criticizing
China's
government at the then UN Human Rights Commission.
10) The repression, imprisonment and severe mistreatment of Falun Gong
practitioners
must stop immediately.
11) All detention facilities, including forced labour camps, must be opened for
international community inspection through the International Committee for the
Red
Cross or other human rights or humanitarian organization.
12) Chinese hospitals should keep records of the source of every transplant.
These
records should be available for inspection by international human rights
officials.
13) Every organ transplant donor should consent to the donation in writing.
These
consents should be available for inspection by international human rights
officials.
14) China and every other state now party to the Convention against Torture,
including
Canada, should accede to the Optional Protocol to the Convention against
Torture.
15) Every organ transplant, both donation and receipt, should have official
approval
from a government supervisory agency before the transplant takes place.
16) Organ harvesting from executed prisoners should cease immediately.
17) Commercialization of organ transplants should cease. Organ transplants
should
not
be for sale.
45
K. Commentary
To accept the first recommendation would mean accepting that the allegations are
true.
All the other recommendations we make do not require accepting that the
allegations
are true. We suggest adoption of these other recommendations in any case.
To accept the next three recommendations would mean giving at least some
credence
to the allegations. The next three recommendations do not require accepting the
allegations as true; but they make sense only if there is a reasonable
possibility the
recommendations are true.
The remaining recommendations make sense and could be implemented whether
the
allegations are true or false. The next five recommendations are addressed to
the
international community, asking the community to promote respect within China of
international standards about organ transplants.
We are well aware that the Government of China denies the allegations. We
suggest
that the most credible and effective way from the Government of China to assert
that
denial is to implement all of the remaining recommendations in this report after
the
first
eight recommendations. If the remaining recommendations were implemented,
the
allegations considered here could no longer be made.
To all those are sceptical about the allegations, we ask you to ask yourself
what you
would suggest to prevent, in any state, allegations like these from becoming
true.
The
common sense list of precautions to prevent the sort of activity here alleged
have
pretty much all been missing in China. Until the recent legislation was in
force,
many
basic precautions to prevent the abuses here alleged from happening were not in
place.
That legislation does not fill the gap unless and until it is comprehensively
implemented.
Every state, and not just China, needs to lay in its defences in order to
prevent the
46
harvesting of organs from the unwilling, the marginalized, the defenceless.
Whatever
one thinks of the allegations, and we reiterate we believe them to be true,
China is
remarkably undefended to prevent the sorts of activities here alleged from
happening.
There are many reasons why the death penalty is wrong. Not least is the
densitization
of the executioners. When the state kills defenceless human beings already in
detention
for their crimes, it becomes all too easy to take the next step, harvesting
their
organs
without their consent. This is a step China undoubtedly took. When the state
harvests
the organs of executed prisoners without their consent, it is another step that
becomes
all too easy and tempting to take to harvest the organs of other vilified,
depersonalised,
defenceless prisoners without their consent, especially when there is big money
to
be
made from it. We urge the government of China, whatever they think of the
allegations
considered here, to build up their defences against even the slightest
possibility of
the
harvesting of organs from unwilling Falun Gong practitioners.
All of which is respectfully submitted,
(Signature) (Signature)
____________________ _______________________
David Matas David Kilgour
Ottawa 6July 2006
1
(APPENDICES 1-12 are in a seperate file.)
APPENDIX 13 TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW
Interview With Ex-Wife Of A Chinese Surgeon
Who Removed Corneas Of Falun Gong Practitioners
On May 20, 2006, Mr. David Kilgour conducted an interview in the United States
with
the ex-wife of a Chinese surgeon who removed corneas of Falun Gong prisoners.
The
following transcript was abridged and edited to protect those who may be in
danger
due to the publishing of this interview.
W - Ex-wife of a Chinese surgeon who removed corneas of Falun Gong
Practitioners.
A - Another person who was also present at the Interview raised 2 questions.
Kilgour: ... The closest person who saw this happen is "W". ... In 2001 when did
the
procurement of food supplies for [Sujiatun Hospital] go up?
W: About July in the summer.
Kilgour: July 2001.You were in the accounting department?
W: Statistics and Logistics Department.
Kilgour: Statistics and Logistics Department. What happened? The procurement of
food
went up first and then the surgical equipment?
W: In July 2001, there were many people working in the Statistics and Logistics
Department. Some of them from procurement brought the receipts to me for
signature
after they made the purchase. On the receipt I noted sharp increases in the food
supplies. Also the people in charge of the logistics were delivering meals to
the
facilities
where Falun Gong practitioners were detained. Other medial staff came to our
department to report the purchase of the medical equipment. From the receipts,
the
medial equipment supplies also sharply increased.
Kilgour: By the way, the facilities to detain Falun Gong practitioners, was it
the
underground facilities?
W: In the backyard of the hospital, there were some one-story houses typically
built
for
construction workers. After several months, the consumption of food and other
supplies
gradually decreased. At that time people guessed that maybe the detainees were
sent
to an underground facility.
2
Kilgour: When did the supply decrease? September? October?
W: After about 4 or 5 months.
Kilgour: End of 2001?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: How much of an increase did you estimate it was from the food [receipts
you
saw]? How many people you estimated were there?
W: The person in charge of getting the food and in charge of sending food to
Falun
Gong practitioners detained told me that there were about 5000 to 6000
practitioners.
At the time, a lot of public security bureaus and hospitals in many areas were
detaining
many Falun Gong practitioners. A lot of people working at the hospital including
me
were not Falun Gong practitioners. So we didn't pay attention. If it were not
for
what
happened in 2003 when I found my ex-husband was directly involved in it, I
probably
wouldn't be interested in this at all. A lot of the staffers working in our
department
are
family members of the officials in government health care system. For some
matters,
we knew it in our heart but none of us would discuss these things.
Kilgour: When they decreased the procurement, where did your think the
practitioners
went?
W: We thought they were released.
Kilgour: At the end of 2001, you thought they were released?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: All 5000 had been released?
W: No, there were still Falun Gong practitioners detained in the hospital, but
the
number was gradually decreasing. Later in 2003, I learned that Falun Gong
practitioners were transferred to the underground complex and other hospitals,
because our hospital couldn't hold so many people.
Kilgour: They left the houses or cabins at the backyard to go to underground?
W: Yes, I later got to know these in 2002.
Kilgour: Did you say that you were not the person to send the food to them when
practitioners were detained at the houses or cabins at the backyard?
3
W: No, I was not.
Kilgour: Did you know who supplied their meals after they left your
jurisdiction?
W: I didn't know.
Kilgour: I heard a lot of these people were killed for their organs. 2001 and
2002.
Was
it the correct understanding?
W: During the years of 2001-2002, I didn't know anything about organ harvesting.
I
only knew the detaining of these people.
Kilgour: So you didn't discover this until you husband told you in 2003.
W: Right.
Kilgour: Did he tell you 2001-2002 he already started doing these operations?
W: Yes, he started from 2002.
Kilgour: Your former husband began in 2002?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: Did you roughly know if there were [organ removal] operations since
2001?
W: The operations started in 2001, some were done in our hospital, and some were
done at other hospitals in the region. I found out in 2003.
At the beginning he also did the operations, but he did not know they were Falun
Gong
practitioners. He was a nureo-surgeon. He removed corneas. Starting from 2002 he
got
to know those he operated on were Falun Gong practitioners. Because our hospital
was
not an organ transplant hospital. It was only in charge of removal. How these
organs
were transplanted, he didn't know.
Kilgour: Your ex-husband started to take organs from Falun Gong practitioners
starting
from when?
W: At the end of 2001, he started to operate, but he didn't know these live
bodies
were
Falun Gong practitioners. He got to know that in 2002.
Kilgour: What kind of organs did he take out?
W: Corneas.
4
Kilgour: Just corneas?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: Were these people alive or dead?
W: Usually these Falun Gong practitioners were injected with a shot to cause
heart
failure. During the process these people would be pushed into operation rooms to
have
their organs removed. On the surface the heart stopped beating, but the brain
was
still
functioning, because of that shot.
Kilgour: What was the injection called?
W: I don't know the name of it but it caused heart failure. I was not a nurse or
a
doctor. Don't know the names of the injection.
Kilgour: Causing heart failure, most, or all or some cases?
W: For most people.
Kilgour: So he would take corneas of these people, then what happened to these
people?
W: These people were pushed to other operation rooms for removals of heart,
liver,
kidneys, etc. During one operation when he collaborated with other doctors, he
learned
they were Falun Gong practitioners, that their organs were removed while alive,
and
that it was not just cornea removal -, they were removing many organs.
Kilgour: They did it in different rooms, didn't they?
W: In the later period of time, when these doctors cooperated together, they
started
doing the operations together. At the beginning, fearing information could leak
out;
different organs were removed by different doctors at different rooms. Later on
when
they got money, they were no longer afraid any more. They started to remove the
organs together.
For other practitioners who were operated in other hospital, my ex-husband
didn't
know what happened to them afterwards. For the practitioners in our hospital,
after
their kidneys, liver, etc and skin were removed, there were only bones and
flesh,
etc.
left. The bodies were thrown into the boiler room at the hospital.
In the beginning, I did not fully believe this had happened. For some doctors
who
had
operation accidents, they may form some illusions. So I checked with other
doctors
and
other officials from the government health care system.
5
Kilgour: in 2003 or 2002?
W: 2003.
Kilgour: Your husband only did corneas?
W: yes
Kilgour: how many cornea operations did your ex-husband perform?
W: He said about 2000.
Kilgour: Corneas of 2000 people, or 2000 corneas?
W: Corneas of around 2000 people.
Kilgour: This is from 2001 to 2003?
W: From the end of 2001 to October 2003.
Kilgour: That was when he left?
W: It was the time that I got to know this and he stopped doing it.
Kilgour: Where did these corneas go?
W: It was usually collected by other hospitals. There was an existing system
handling
such business of removal and sales of the organs to other hospitals or other
areas.
Kilgour: Nearby or far away?
W: I don't know.
Kilgour: All the heart, liver, kidneys and corneas go off to other hospitals?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: Did you know what prices they sold them for?
W: I don't know at the time. However, in year 2002, a neighbor had a liver
transplant.
It cost 200,000 yuan. The hospital charged a little bit less for Chinese than
foreigners.
Kilgour: Which year, 2001 or 2002?
6
W: 2002.
Kilgour: What was the husband told?, How did they justify? These were perfectly
healthy people...
W: In the beginning, he wasn't told anything. He was asked to help out in other
hospitals. However every time when he did such favor, or provided this kind of
help,
he
got lots of money, and cash awards. Several dozens of times his normal salary.
Kilgour: What was the total amount of money he got out of the 2000 cornea
removal?
W: Hundreds of thousands of US dollars.
Kilgour: were they paid in US dollars?
W: Paid in Chinese yuan. Equivalent to Hundreds of thousands of US dollars.
Kilgour: How many doctors were working on these organ removals in the hospital,
and
in which area? Are we talking about 100 doctors or dozens, or 10?
W: I don't know how many people were doing it specifically. But I know that
about
4 or
5 doctors whom were acquaintances of us at our hospital were doing it. And in
other
hospitals, doctors of general practice were also doing this.
Kilgour: Is there any records in the statistics department regarding how many
people
were operated upon?
W: There was no proper procedure or paper work for this kind of operations. So
there
was no way to count the number of operations in the normal way.
Kilgour: After practitioners transferred underground at the end of 2001, did you
know
where their food supplies were from?
W: Food still came from our department. Just the amount gradually decreased.
At the end of 2001 we thought they were released. In 2003, I learned that they
were
not released but were transferred to underground or other hospital.
Kilgour: Was the underground facility run by the military army or by the
hospital?
You
said food was still from the hospital.
W: We weren't responsible for the procurement of the food for the people
detained
and
kept underground. That is why there is so much difference in the procuring of
food
when people were transferred to the underground complex. But the food of some
of
7
the detainees were provided by the hospital, and others were not. The decrease
of
food
was not proportional to the decrease of the number of detainees.
Kilgour: What did your husband tell you about the underground facility? 5000
people
killed, or more than 5000?
W: He didn't know how many people were detained underground. He only heard
from
some others that people were detained underground. If three operations were
done
every day, after several years of operation, for the 5000-6000 people, not many
people
would be left. This whole scheme and the trading of organs were organized by the
government health care system. The doctors' responsibility was simply to do what
they
were told to do.
Kilgour: He didn't go down to the underground facility himself?
W: He didn't.
Kilgour: Rudimentary operation in the underground facility?
W: He had never been there.
Kilgour: All of those people, were they dead when they were operated on? Or
their
hearts stopped? Did he know what they were killed afterwards? They weren't yet
dead.
W: At the beginning, he doesn't know these were Faun Gong practitioners. As time
went by, he knew they were Faun Gong practitioners. When they did more of these
removals of organs and became bold, these doctors started to do the removals
together - this doctor extracted the cornea; another doctor removed the kidney;
the
third doctor took out the liver. At that time, this patient, or this Faun Gong
practitioner,
he knew what was the next step to treat the body. (Translator added the
translation of
the two missed sentences: Yes, the heart stopped beating, but they were still
living.)
If
the victim's skin was not pealed off and only internal organs were removed, the
openings of the bodies would be sealed and an agent would sign the paperwork.
The
bodies would be sent to the crematorium near the Sujiatun area.
Kilgour: Only if when the skin were removed, they would be sent to the boiler's
room?
W: Yes.
Kilgour: Usually what was the "supposed" cause of death given?
W: Usually no specific reason when the bodies were sent to the crematorium.
Usually
the reasons were "The heart stopped beating", "heart failure". When these people
were
rounded up and detained, nobody knew their names or where they were from. So
when
8
they were sent to the crematorium, nobody could claim their bodies.
Kilgour: Who administered the drug to cause the heart to stop beating?
W: Nurse.
Kilgour: Nurse working for the hospital?
W: Nurses brought over by these doctors. Doctors including my ex-husband came
to
this hospital in 1999 or 2000. He brought his nurse over. When organ harvest
first
started, nurses were assigned to the doctors. Wherever the doctors go, their
nurses
go
with them as far as the organ removal operations were concerned. These nurses
were
not like personal secretaries.
In year 2003, government health authorities sent many doctors involved in organ
removal operations to an area sealed by the government because of SARS. These
doctors believed they were sent there to let them live or die over there. I mean
the
government already wanted to put to death secretively the first group involved
in
organ
removal. So they sent them to SARS affected area in Beijing.
From that point on my husband realized that there was danger in doing this and
that
any time, he could be killed and done away with as accomplice. Later when he
wanted
to quit, someone did try to kill him.
Kilgour: In the hospital?
W: Outside the hospital.
Kilgour: Can you give us more details?
W: At the end of 2003 after I learned about the issue, he came back from
Beijing.
He
could no longer live a normal life. After I knew about it, he listened to my
advice and
decided to quit doing it. He submitted the resignation letter. It was around the
new
year of 2004.
In February 2004, after his resignation was granted, the last month working in
the
hospital, he was finishing open ends at his work. During that time we received
phone
threats at home. Someone said to him, "You watch out for your life."
One day we got off work in the afternoon. There were 2 people walking toward us
trying to assassinate him. If you were a woman, I would show you my scar,
because I
pushed him aside and took the stab. Because men do not have very good six
senses,
so
he kept walking. When I realized the 2 people were going to pull the knife to
stab
him,
I pushed him aside and took the stab for him. Many people came over and I was
sent
9
to the hospital. These two men ran away.
Kilgour: Which side? (Location of the scar)
W: Right side.
Kilgour: Do you know who these two people were?
W: I didn't know in the beginning. Later I knew.
Kilgour: Who were they?
W: I learned that they were thugs hired by the government health authorities.
Kilgour: How did you find that out about this two?
W: Because my family was part of the government health care system. My mom
used
to be a doctor.
After these things happened, our friends suggested we get a divorce so it would
separate our children and me from my husband. After all, our children and I
didn't
participate in any of these. So we were divorced at the end of 2003, very close
to
the
new year of 2004.
Kilgour: How many did you think were still alive?
W: Initially I estimated there were about 2000 people left at the time I left
China in
2004. But I cannot give a figure anymore, because China is still arresting Falun
Gong
practitioners and there have been people come in and going out. So I cannot give
a
figure now any more.
Kilgour: How did you come to this number 2000 in 2004?
W: According to how many my ex-husband did and how many other doctors did.
And
how many sent to other hospitals. Good doctors are well connected within the
health
care system. Many of them used to be classmates in medical schools. The number
was
estimated by the few doctors involved. When we were together in private, they
discussed how many people in total. At that time, these doctors did not want to
continue. They wanted to go to other countries or transfer to other fields. So
the
total
number of death was calculated and derived by these doctors involved.
Kilgour: What is their estimate of how many people were killed?
W: They estimated 3000-4000 people.
10
Kilgour: This is the estimate by all of the doctors?
W: No. By three doctors we were familiar with.
Kilgour: Do you have anything else you want to say?
W: Chinese or non-Chinese, they think it is impossible Sujiatun detained so many
Falun
Gong practitioners. They focused on just this Sujiatun hospital. Because most
people do
not know there are underground facilities. I want to say, even if things were
over
for
Sujiatun, in other hospitals this issue continues. Because I worked in Sujiatun,
I
know
about Sujiatun. Other hospitals and detention centers, inspecting and putting
control on
these facilities will help reduce the deaths.
For Chinese people, one person comes out, there are still family members in
China.
They still dare not come out to speak the truth. They are afraid it could put
their
family
members in danger. It doesn't mean that they don't know about it.
A: Does your mother know about what you are doing?
W: Yes.
A: Does she still work in the government health care system?
W: No. She retired a long time ago. She is almost 70 years old.
1
APPENDIX 14 TRANSCRIPT OF TELEPHNOE INVESTIGATIONS
(1) Mishan City Detention Centre, Heilongjiang province (8 June 2006):
M: Do you have Falun Gong [organ] suppliers? ...
Mr. Li: We used to have, yes.
M: ... what about now?
Mr. Li: ... Yes.
......
M: Can we come to select, or you provide directly to us?
Mr.Li: We provide them to you.
M: What about the price?
Mr. Li: We discuss after you come.
......
M: How many [Falun Gong suppliers] under age 40 do you have?
Mr. Li: Quite a few.
......
M: Are they male or female?
Mr. Li: Male
......
M: Now, for ... the male Falun Gong [prisoners], How many of them do you have?
Mr. Li: Seven, eight, we have [at least] five, six now.
M: Are they from countryside or from the city?
Mr. Li: countryside.
2
(2)Shanghai's Zhongshan Hospital Organ Transplant Clinic (16 March 2006):
M: Hi. Are you a doctor?
Doctor: Yes, I am...
......
M: ...So how long do I have to wait [for organ transplant surgery]?
Doctor: About a week after you come...
M: Is there the kind of organs that come from Falun Gong? I heard that they are
very
good."
Doctor: All of ours are those types.
(3) Qianfoshan City Liver Transplant Hospital, Shandong province (16 March
2006):
Receptionist: "Hold a second. I'll get a doctor for you.
Doctor: Hello. How are you?
M: ... How long have you been doing [these operations]?...
Doctor: ... Over four years.
...
M: The supply of livers.. the ones from Falun Gong, I want to ask if you have
those
types?"
Doctor: It is ok if you come here.
M: So that means you have them?
Doctor: ...In April, there will be more of these kinds of suppliers.., now
gradually we
have more and more."
M: Why will there be more in April?
Doctor: This I can't explain to you...
3
(4)Nanning City Minzu Hospital in Guangxi Autonomous Region (22 May 2006):
M: Could you find organs from Falun Gong practitioners?
Dr. Lu: Let me tell you, we have no way to get (them). It's rather difficult to
get it
nowin Guangxi. If you cannot wait, I suggest you go to Guangzhou because it's
very
easy for them to get the organs. They are able to look for them nation wide. As
they
are performing the liver transplant, they can get the kidney for you at the same
time,
so it's very easy for them to do. Many places where supplies are short go to
them
for
help.
......
M: Why is it easy for them to get?...
Lu: Because they are an important institution. They contact the judicial system
in
the
name of the whole university.
M: Then they use organs from Falun Gong practitioners?
Lu: Correct...
......
M: ... What you used before (organs from Falun Gong practitioners), were they
from
detention centre(s) or prison(s)?"
Lu: From prisons.
M: ... And it was from healthy Falun Gong practioners...?
Lu: Correct. We would choose the good ones because we assure the quality in our
operation."
M: That means you choose the organs yourself.
Lu: Correct...
......
M: Usually, how old is the organ supplier?
4
Lu: Usually in their thirties.
M: ... Then you will go to the prison to select yourself?
Lu: Correct. We must select it.
M: What if the chosen one doesn't want to have blood drawn?
Lu: He will for sure let us do it.
M: How?
Lu: They will for sure find a way. What do you worry about? These kinds of
things
should not be of any concern to you. They have their rocedures.
M: Does the person know that his organ will be removed?
Lu: No, he doesn't.
(5)Shanghai Jiaotong University Hospital's Liver Transplant Centre (16 March
2006):
M: "I want to know how long [ the patients] have to wait (for a liver
transplant).
Dr. Dai: The supply of organs we have, we have every day. We do them every day.
M: We want fresh, alive ones.
Dr. Dai: They are all alive, all alive...
M: How many [liver transplants] have you done?
Dr. Dai: We have done 400 to 500 cases...Your major job is to come, prepare the
money, enough money, and come.
M: How much is it?
Dr. Dai: If everything goes smoothly, it's about RMB 150,000...RMB 200,000.
M: How long do I have to wait?
Dr. Dai: I need to check your blood type...If you come today, I may do it for
you
within
one week.
5
M: I heard some come from those who practise Falun Gong, those who are very
healthy.
Dr. Dai: UYes, we have. I can't talk clearly to you over the phone.
M: If you can find me this type, I am coming very soon.
Dr. Dai: It's ok. Please come.
M: ...What is your last name?...
Dr. Dai: I'm Doctor Dai.
(6) Zhengzhou Medical University Organ Transplant Centre in Henan Province (14
March 2006):
Dr. Wang: ...For sure, [the organ] is healthy... If it's not healthy, we won't
take it.
M: I've heard that those kidneys from Falun Gong practitioners are better. Do
you
have
them?
Wang: Yes, yes, we pick all the young and healthy kidneys...
M: That is the kind that practises this type of [Falun] Gong.
Wang: For this, you could rest assured. Sorry I can't tell you much on the
phone.
M: Do you get (them) out of town?
Wang: ... We have local ones and out-of-town ones.
......
M: What is your last name?
Wang: Wang
(7) Oriental Organ Transplant Center (also called Tianjin City No 1 Central
Hospital),
Tianjin City, (15 March 2006):
N: Is this Chief-Physician Song?
6
Song: Yes, please speak.
......
N: Her doctor told her that the kidney is quite good because he [the supplier,]
practises
...Falun Gong.
Song: Of course. We have all those who breathe and with heart beat...Up until
now,
for
this year, we have more than ten kidneys, more than ten such kidneys.
N: More than ten of this kind of kidneys? You mean live bodies?
Song: Yes it is so.
(8) Tongji Hospital in Wuhan City, Wuhan City, Hunan Province (30 March 2006):
N: How many (kidney transplants) can you do in a year?
Official: ... Our department is the one that does the most in the whole Hubei
province.
We do a lot if the organ suppliers are ample.
N: ... We hope the kidney suppliers are alive. [We're] looking for live organ
transplants
from prisoners, for example, using living bodies from prisoners who practise
Falun
Gong. Is it possible?
Official: It's not a problem.
(9) General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Region, Guangdong Province (12 April
2006):
N: Is this Dr. Zhu...?
Zhu: Yes that's me.
N: I'm from hospital 304. ...... I have two relatives in hospital 304. We don't
have
enough kidney supply right now. We did a lot of [kidney transplants] in 2001,
2002
and
2003...
Zhu: Right...
N: We found that kidneys from young people and Falun Gong [practitioners] are
better.
How about your hospital, such as kidneys from Falun Gong?
7
Zhu: We have very few kidneys from Falun Gong.
N: But you still have some?
Zhu: It is not hard for [blood] type B. If you come here, we can arrange it
quickly,
definitely before May 1.
N: There will be a batch before May 1?
Zhu: Several batches.
N: Will you have some after May 1?
Zhu: After May 1, you may need to wait until May 20 or later.
......
(10) First Detention Centre of Qinhuangdao city,Shangdong Province (18 May
2006):
N: Is this the First Detention Centre of Qinhuangdao City?"
Official: "What's up?
N: We are doing kidney transplantations and we don't have enough organs.
Official: You don't need to call here. You just call the court.
N: Which court?
Official: It is the Intermediate People's Court. You need to tell them about
such
thing.
N: In 2001, you provided live organs from young and healthy people who practised
Falun Gong...
Official: You don't need to talk about that time. It has been so many years.
Right
now it
is with the court. You just call them.
(11) The Second Detention Centre of Qinhuangdao city Shangdong Province (18
May
2006):
......
N:... I wonder if you still have live organ supplies from people such as those
practising
8
Falun Gong?
Official: No, we don't have Falun Gong [organs] right now. There are very few
people-
almost none. During earlier 2000s there [were] many Falun Gong [organs].
......
(12) The Qinhuangdao Intermediate People's Court Shangdong Province (18 May
2006):
......
N: ... Can your court provide us with some live kidneys from young and healthy
people?
Official: No matter good or bad, we have none. There is no execution after the
Spring
festival...
N:... I mean live kidneys from young and healthy people who practise Falun Gong.
You
had a lot in 2001...
Official: We had before...
N: ... Not just the executed prisoners-such live organs as Falun Gong...?
Official: No, what you said is in 2001. We have to face reality now...
......
(13) The First Criminal Bureau of the Jinzhou Intermediate People's Court (23
May
2006):
N: Starting from 2001, we always (got) kidneys from young and healthy people
who
practise Falun Gong from detention centres and courts...I wonder if you still
have
such
organs in your court right now?
Official: That depends on your qualifications... If you have good
qualifications, we
may
still provide some...
N: Are we supposed to get them, or will you prepare for them?"
Official: According to past experience, it is you that will come here to get
them.
N: ... What are the qualifications that we must have?
9
Official: ... Let's say for now this year is very different from previous years.
This year
the situation is very tough...The policy is very strict. Several years ago we
had a
good
relationship with Beijing, but recently it is very tense...It's all about mutual
benefits...
(14) Kunming Higher People's Court (31 May 2006):
N: ... We contacted your court several times in 2001. Your court can provide us
with
those live kidney organs from those young and healthy Falun Gong
practitioners...?
Official: I am not sure about that. Such things are related to national secrets.
I don't
think this is something that we can talk about on the phone. If you want to know
more
information about these things, you'd better contact us in a formal way, okay?



Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:49 pm

leshydonlop@...
Send Email Send Email

OPEN LETTER to Gao Zhisheng, Chinese Human Rights advocate, June 4 2006

By EDWARD MCMILLAN-SCOTT
VICE-PRESIDENT of European Parliament

Thank you for your remarks* after my visit to Beijing on May 20 – 24 2006
when I interviewed two Falun Gong former prisoners, after which they
disappeared. Because of this I did not meet you. I am now told I was the
first politician to hold such a meeting: if so I urge many others to do
the same.

Mr Niu Jinping and his baby daughter are under house arrest and Mr Cao Dong
has still been missing, I am pursuing their safety with the regime. Mr Steve
Gigliotti, the US citizen who organised my meeting, was arrested, interrogated
and deported. Such actions have no place in today’s world.

I last visited China and Tibet ten years ago while preparing a report for
the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. Welcoming China’s
booming trade with Europe, but also regretting its complete lack of democracy,
I encouraged “not just business as usual, but also politics as usual”.
While the trade has flourished, political development has remained glacial and
the European Union’s human rights dialogue with China, begun then, continues
to be largely fruitless.

My recent visit as rapporteur for the European Parliament on the EU’s new
Democracy and Human Rights Instrument, to run from 2007, was to examine how it
could operate in China. I met EU diplomats, academics, NGOs and individuals.

My conclusions are that the Chinese regime remains brutal, arbitrary and
paranoid
but that the innate intelligence and self-discipline of the Chinese, led by a
developing civil society and emerging rule of law must lead to a democratic
future.

The condition of prisoners in China is increasingly well-known but it is only in
recent months that a particular mistreatment - of Falun Gong practitioners - has
come to light, namely the selection of prisoners for ‘reverse-match’ organ and
tissue transplants, leading to their deaths. This is genocide, as defined in
Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide:

"any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in
part,
a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: Killing members of the
group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately
inflicting
on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical
destruction
in whole or in part;”

Like you, I am a Christian, by upbringing. My contacts with Falun Gong
practitioners
during my visit to Beijing, Hong Kong and Taiwan and subsequently (I visited on
June
1 an exhibition in Helsinki of paintings depicting the treatment of Falun Gong
prisoners
in China) do not suggest a political movement. It is, if anything, a spiritual
practice
of Buddha school origin in which every adherent I have met feels mentally and
physically
enhanced by a series of Tai-chi type daily exercises.

The practitioners I met in Beijing told me of their imprisonment and that of
their wives,
of the specially harsh treatment they suffered, including sleep deprivation,
degrading
and humiliating punishments and beatings of up to 20 hours at a time to elicit
denunciations
of Falun Gong. One said he knew 30 fellow practitioners who had been beaten to
death.
They were aware of organ harvesting: one had seen the cadaver of his friend and
fellow
practitioner after body parts had been removed.

Since the crackdown on Falun Gong was begun by the Communist Party of China
(CCP) regime
in 1999, including the establishment of a special “6-10” office of repression,
Falun Gong
has responded by using factual disclosure of persecution and other crimes by the
regime.
As a result it claims that more than 10 million Chinese have resigned the CCP
and its
affiliations.

As a British Conservative I have witnessed with relief – and played some part in
encouraging
– the freedom from communism now enjoyed by millions of Europeans. I urge all
members of
the CCP to recognise that the horrors perpetrated in its name – the Great Leap
Forward,
the Cultural Revolution and the Tiananmen Massacres – are held to be responsible
for some
80 million deaths.

It is now a matter of probably brief time before the regime collapses. The
massive economic
contradictions, manifest administrative corruption, widespread dissent in the
countryside,
increasing courage of religious groups and the ability of young people to
circumvent Internet
restrictions are all precursors to change.

The Chinese people have friends wherever thought, religion and association are
free. The regime
has no friends and, while I despise it, I hope that the change is as peaceful as
the process
which ended one-party domination in Europe.

In the meantime, like other politicians across the free world, I warn those
responsible of the
consequences of genocide.

On this anniversary of the massacres in Tiananmen Square and elsewhere in 1989,
I urge my
colleagues in the European Parliament and in freely-elected assemblies across
the world to
monitor systematically the abuses which you have so courageously brought to
public attention.
I also urge all embassies of the EU in China to provide support – and when
necessary sanctuary
- to human rights defenders like yourself. The future will be the judge of us
all.



Epoch Times Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party - Part 1Nine
Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party - Introduction

More than a decade after the fall of the former Soviet Union and Eastern
European Communist regimes, the international communist movement has been
spurned worldwide. The demise of the Chinese Communist Party is only a matter of
time.
Nevertheless, before its complete collapse, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is
trying to tie its fate to the Chinese nation, with its 5000 years of
civilization. This is a disaster for the Chinese people. The Chinese people now
must face how they should view the CCP, how China may evolve into a society
without the CCP, and how the Chinese people may recover and pass on its
tradition and heritage. How the Chinese people answer these questions is of the
greatest importance, not only for the Chinese people, but for peoples all over
the world.
The Epoch Times is now publishing a special editorial series, “Nine Commentaries
on the Chinese Communist Party.” Before the lid is laid on the coffin of the
CCP, we wish to pass a final judgment on it and on the international Communist
movement, which have brought disaster to mankind for over a century.
Throughout its 80-plus years, everything the CCP has touched has been marred
with lies, wars, famine, tyranny, massacre and terror. Traditional faiths and
values have been violently destroyed. Original ethical concepts and original
social structures have been disintegrated by force. Empathy, love and harmony
have been twisted into struggle and hatred. Veneration and appreciation of the
heaven and earth have been replaced by an arrogant desire to “fight with heaven
and earth.” The result has been a total collapse of social, moral and ecological
systems, and a profound crisis for the Chinese people, and indeed for humanity.
All these calamities have been brought about through the planning, organization,
and control of the CCP.
As a famous Chinese poem goes, “Deeply I sigh in vain for the falling flowers.”
The end is near for the Communist regime, which is barely struggling to survive.
The days before its collapse are numbered. The Epoch Times believes the time is
now ripe, before the CCP’s total demise, for a comprehensive look back, in order
to expose fully to the Chinese people and the world the unprecedented evil the
CCP has done. Like a giant cult, the CCP has depended on its ability to control
the minds of a great nation through a combination of force and fraud. We hope
that those who are still deceived by the CCP will now see it clearly, purge its
influence from their minds, extricate themselves from its control, and jump out
of the shackles of terror, abandoning for good all illusions about it.
The CCP’s rule is the darkest and the most ridiculous page in Chinese history.
Among its unending list of crimes, the vilest must be its persecution of Falun
Gong. In persecuting “Truthfulness, Compassion, Tolerance” Jiang Zemin set the
CCP against conscience itself. The Epoch Times believes that by understanding
the true history of the CCP, we can help prevent such tragedies from ever
recurring.
The titles of the “Nine Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party” are:
1. What is the Communist Party?
2. The Beginnings of the Chinese Communist Party
3. The Tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party
4. The Chinese Communist Party Opposes Nature
5. The Collusion of Jiang Zemin with the CCP to Persecute Falun Gong
6. The Chinese Communist Party Destroyed Traditional Culture
7. The Chinese Communist Party’s History of Killing
8. How the Chinese Communist Party Is an Evil Cult
9. The Chinese Communist Party, a Band of Scoundrels
The Epoch Times Editorial Board


Epoch Times Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party - Part 1


What Is the Communist Party?
Foreword
For over five thousand years, the Chinese people have created a splendid
civilization on land nurtured by the Yellow River and Yangtze River. During this
long period of time, dynasties have come and gone, and the Chinese culture has
waxed and waned. Grand and moving stories have played out on the historical
stage of China.
The year 1840, the year commonly considered by historians as the beginning of
China’s contemporary era, marked the start of China’s journey from tradition to
modernization. Chinese civilization experienced four major episodes of challenge
and response. The first three episodes include the invasion of Beijing by the
English-French allied force in the early 1860s, the Sino-Japanese war in 1894,
and the Russo-Japanese war in China’s northeast in 1906. To these three episodes
of challenge, China responded with the Westernization movement, which was marked
by the importation of modern goods and weapons, institutional reforms through
the Reform Movement of 1898 and the attempt at the end of the late Qing Dynasty
to establish constitutional rule, and later, the Democratic Revolution of 1911.
At the end of the First World War, China, though it emerged victorious, was not
listed among the stronger powers at that time. Many Chinese believed that the
first three episodes of response had failed. The May-Fourth Movement would lead
to the fourth attempt at responding to previous challenges and culminate in the
complete westernization of Chinese culture through the communist movement and
its extreme revolution.
This article concerns the impact on the civilization of China of the communist
movement and the Communist Party. Looking at the history of China’s last 160
years, nearly one hundred million people have died unnatural deaths. After all
that has happened to China’s traditional culture and civilization, whether
chosen by the Chinese or imposed on China from the outside, what have been the
consequences?
I. Relying on Violence and Terror to Gain and Maintain Power
“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare
that their ends can be attained only by the violent overthrow of all existing
social conditions.” This quote is taken from the concluding paragraph of the
Communist Manifesto, the Communist Party’s principal document. Violence is the
one and only means by which the Communist Party gained power. This character
trait has been passed on to all subsequent forms of the Party that have arisen
since its birth.
In fact, the world’s first Communist Party was established many years after Karl
Marx’s death. After the October Revolution in 1917, the “All Russian Communist
Party (Bolshevik)” (later to be known as the “Communist Party of the Soviet
Union”) was born. This party grew out of the use of violence against “class
enemies” and was maintained through violence against Party members and ordinary
citizens deemed traitors. During Stalin’s purges in the 1930s, the Soviet
Communist party slaughtered over 20 million so-called spies and traitors, and
those thought to have different opinions.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) first started as a branch of the Soviet
Communist Party in the Third Communist International. Therefore, it naturally
inherited the willingness to kill. During China’s first Communist-Kuomintang
civil war between 1927 and 1936, the population in Jiangxi province dropped from
over 20 million to about 10 million. The damage wrought by the use of violence
can be seen from these figures alone.
Using violence may be unavoidable when attempting to gain political power, but
there has never been a regime as eager to kill as the CCP, especially during
otherwise peaceful periods. Since 1949, the number of deaths caused by CCP
violence has surpassed the total deaths during the wars waged between 1927 and
1949.
An excellent example of the Communist Party’s use of violence is its support of
the Cambodian Khmer Rouge. Under the Khmer Rouge a quarter of Cambodia’s
population, many of them of Chinese descent, were murdered. China still blocks
the international community from putting the Khmer Rouge on trial, so as to
cover up the CCP’s role in the genocide.
The CCP has close connections with some of the world’s most brutal political
movements and regimes. In addition to the Khmer Rouge, these include the
Communist Parties in Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Burma, Laos,
and Nepal- all of which have been supported by the CCP. Many leaders in these
Communist Parties are Chinese; some of them are still hiding in China to this
day.
Other Maoist-based Communist Parties include South America’s Shining Path and
the Japanese Red Army, whose atrocities have been condemned by the world
community.
One of the theories the communists employ is social Darwinism. The Communist
Party applies Darwin’s inter-species competition to human relationships and
human history, maintaining that class struggle is the only driving force for
societal development. Struggle, therefore, became the primary “belief” of the
Communist party, a tool in gaining and maintaining political control. Mao’s
famous words plainly betray this logic of the survival of the fittest: “With 800
million people, how can it work without struggle?”
Another of Mao’s claims is similarly famous: that the Cultural Revolution should
be conducted “every seven or eight years.” The CCP has used force repeatedly to
terrify the Chinese people into submission. Every struggle and movement served
as an exercise in terror, so that the Chinese people trembled in their hearts
and gradually became enslaved under the CCP’s control.
Today, terrorism has become the main enemy of the civilized and free world. The
CCP’s exercise of violent terror, thanks to the apparatus of the state, has been
larger in scale, much longer lasting, and its results more devastating. Today,
in the twenty-first century, we should not forget this inherited character of
the Communist Party, since what the Party has been will determine what future it
may have.
II. Using Lies to Justify Violence
The level of civilization can be measured by the degree to which violence is
used in a regime. By resorting to the use of violence, the Communist regimes
clearly represent a huge step backward in human civilization. Unfortunately, the
Communist Party has been seen as progressive by those who believe that violence
is a necessary means to societal advancement.
This acceptance of violence has to be viewed through the Communist Party’s
second inherited character: the employment of deception and lies.
“Since a young age, we have thought of the US as a lovable country. We believe
this is partly due to the fact that the US has never occupied another country,
nor has it launched any attacks on China. More fundamentally, the Chinese people
hold good impressions of the US based on its democratic and open-minded
character.”
This excerpt came from an editorial published on July 4th, 1947 in the CCP’s
official newspaper Xinhua Ribao, A mere three years later, the CCP sent soldiers
to fight American troops in North Korea, painting the Americans as the most evil
imperialists in the world. Every Chinese from mainland China would be surprised
to read this editorial written over 50 years ago. The CCP has banned all
publications quoting similar early passages.
Since coming to power, the CCP has employed lies in its elimination of
counter-revolutionaries, the “cooperation” of public and private enterprises,
the anti-rightist movement, the Cultural Revolution, the Tiananmen Square
massacre, and most recently, the persecution of Falun Gong. The most infamous
instance was the persecution of intellectuals in 1957. The CCP called on the
intellectuals to offer their opinions, but then persecuted them as “rightists,”
using their own speeches as evidence of their “crimes.” When some criticized the
persecution as a conspiracy, or “plot in the dark,” Mao claimed publicly: “That
is not a plot in the dark, but a stratagem in the open.”
Deception and lies have played a very important role in the CCP’s gaining and
maintaining control. China enjoys the longest and most complete history in the
world, and the Chinese, especially Chinese intellectuals, have long held a
belief in using history to assess current reality and even to achieve personal
spiritual improvement. To make history serve the current regime, the CCP has
made a practice of altering and concealing historical truth. The CCP in its
propaganda and publications has rewritten history for periods from as early as
the Spring and Autumn period (770-476 BC) and the Warring States period (475-221
BC) to as recently as the Cultural Revolution. Such historical alterations have
continued for the more than 50 years since 1949, and all efforts to restore
historical truth have been blocked by the CCP.
When violence becomes too weak to sustain control, the CCP resorts to deception
and lies, which serve to justify and mask the rule by violence.
We must admit that deception and lies were not invented by the Communist Party,
but are an age-old indecency that the Communist Party has utilized without
shame. The CCP promised land to the peasants, factories to the workers, freedom
and democracy to the intellectuals, and peace to all. None of these promises has
been realized. One generation of the Chinese died deceived and another
generation continues to be cheated. This is the biggest sorrow of the Chinese
people, the most unfortunate aspect of the Chinese nation.
III. Ever-changing Principles
The Communist Party typically alters its principles frequently. Since its
establishment, the CCP has held 16 national representative meetings and modified
the Party bylaws 16 times. In over five decades of control, the CCP has made
five major modifications to the country’s Constitution.
The ideal of the Communist Party is social equality leading to a communist
society. However, communist-controlled China has experienced rapidly expanding
economic inequalities. Many CCP members have become rich, while millions of
Chinese citizens are mired in poverty.
The guiding theories of the CCP have evolved from Marxism to Maoism, now
including Deng’s thoughts and Jiang’s “Three Represents.” Marxism and Maoism are
not at all compatible with Deng’s and Jiang’s ideologies- they are opposite to
them. The hodgepodge of communist theories employed by the CCP is indeed a
rarity in human history.
The Communist Party’s evolving principles have largely contradicted one another.
From the idea of a global integration transcending the nation-state to today’s
extreme nationalism, from eliminating all private ownership and all exploitative
classes to today’s notion of promoting capitalists to join the party,
yesterday’s principles have become reversed in today’s politics, with further
change expected tomorrow. No matter how often the CCP changes its principles,
the goal remains clear: gaining and maintaining power, and sustaining absolute
control of the society.
In the history of the CCP, there have been more than ten movements that are
“life and death” struggles. In reality, all of these struggles have coincided
with the transfer of power following changes of basic Party principles.
Every change in principles has come from an inevitable crisis faced by the CCP,
threatening its legitimacy and survival. Whether it be collaborating with the
Kuomintang Party, pro-US foreign policy, economic reform and market expansion,
or promoting nationalism—each of these decisions occurred at a moment of crisis,
and all had to do with the solidifying of power. Every cycle of a group
suffering persecution followed by reversal of that persecution has been
connected with changes in the basic principles of the CCP.
A western proverb has it that truths are sustainable and lies mutable. There is
wisdom in this saying.
IV. How Party Nature Takes the Place of Human Nature
The CCP is a Leninist authoritarian regime. Since the inception of the party,
three basic lines have been established, i.e., the political line, the
intellectual line, and the organization line. The political line refers to
setting up goals. The intellectual line refers to the Communist Party’s
philosophical foundation. The organization line refers to how the goals are
achieved. Both CCP members and those ruled by the CCP first and foremost receive
commands; they are required to obey unconditionally. This is the content of the
organization line.
In China, most people know about the double personalities of CCP members. In
private settings, CCP members are ordinary human beings with feelings of
happiness, anger, sorrow and joy. They possess ordinary human beings’ merits and
shortcomings. They may be parents, husbands, wives, or friends. But placed above
human nature and feelings is the Party nature, which, according to the
requirements of the Communist Party, transcends humanity. Thus, humanity becomes
relative and changeable, while Party nature becomes absolute, beyond any doubt
or challenge.
During the Cultural Revolution, fathers and sons tortured each other, husbands
and wives struggled with each other, students and teachers reported on each
other, and mothers and daughters treated each other as enemies. Party nature
motivated the conflicts and hatred. During the early period of CCP rule, some
high-ranking CCP officials were helpless as their family members were labeled as
class enemies. This, again, was driven by Party nature.
The power of the Party nature over the individual results from the CCP’s
life-long course of indoctrination. This training starts in kindergarten, where
party-sanctioned answers to questions are rewarded, answers that do not comply
with common sense or a child’s human nature. From primary school to college,
students receive political education that follows the principles of the
Communist Party. Non-conformers are not allowed to pass and graduate.
A Party member must remain consistent with the Party line when speaking
publicly, no matter how he feels privately. The organizational structure of the
CCP is a gigantic pyramid, with the central power on top controlling the entire
hierarchy. This unique structure is one of the most important features of the
CCP regime, one that helps produce absolute conformity.
Today, the CCP has degenerated into a political entity struggling to maintain
self-interest. It no longer pursues any of the lofty goals of communism.
However, the organizational structure of communism remains, and its demand for
unconditional conformity has not changed. This party, situating itself above
humanity and human nature, removes any organizations or persons deemed
detrimental to its own power, be it ordinary citizens or high-ranking CCP
officials.
V. An Evil Specter Opposes Nature and Human Nature
Unlike the communist regime, non-communist societies, even those suffering under
rigid totalitarian rule and a dictatorship, often allow some degree of
self-organization and self-determination. Ancient Chinese society was in fact
ruled according to a binary structure. In rural regions clans were the center of
an independent social organization, while urban areas were organized around the
guild. The top-down government did not extend below the county level.
The Nazi regime, whose cruelty equals that of the Communist Party, still allowed
rights to private property. The communist regimes eradicated any forms of social
organization independent of the Party, replacing them with highly centralized
power structures.
If bottom-up social structures that allow for the self-determination of the
individual or the group occur naturally, then the communist regime is
anti-nature in its essence.
The Communist Party does not hold universal standards for human nature. The
concepts of good and evil, as well as all laws and rules, are arbitrarily
manipulated. Communists do not allow murder, except for those categorized as
enemies by the Communist Party. Filial piety is welcomed, except for those
parents deemed class enemies. Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, and
faithfulness are all good, but not applicable when the Party is not willing or
doesn’t want to consider these traditional virtues. The Communist Party is built
on principles that oppose human nature.
Non-communist societies generally consider humanity’s dual nature of good and
evil; they rely on fixed social contracts to maintain a balance in society. In
communist societies, however, the very concept of human nature is denied, and
neither good nor evil is acknowledged. Eliminating the concepts of good and
evil, according to Marx, serves to completely overthrow the superstructure of
the old society.
The Communist Party does not believe in God, nor does it even respect physical
nature. “Battle with heaven, fight with the earth, struggle against human beings
— life thus lived is full of joy.” This was the motto of the CCP during the
Cultural Revolution. Great suffering was inflicted on the Chinese people and the
land.
The Chinese traditionally believe in the unity of heaven and human beings. Laozi
said in Dao de Jing, "Humans follow the earth, the earth follows heaven, heaven
follows the Dao, and the Dao follows what is natural." Human beings and nature
exist within a harmonious relationship in the continuous cosmos.
In the Communist Manifesto, Marx proclaimed that “In 1848, a specter is haunting
Europe- the specter of Communism.” Over a century later, the Communist Party has
revealed itself indeed to be an evil specter -against heaven, the earth, and
human beings. It opposes the nature of the universe.
VI. Some Features of Evil Possession
The Communist Party’s organs themselves never participate in productive or
creative activities. Once they grasp power, they attach themselves to the
people, controlling and manipulating them. They extend their power down to the
most basic unit of society for fear of losing control. They monopolize the
resources of production and extract wealth from the society.
In China, the CCP extends everywhere and controls everything, but nobody has
seen the CCP’s accounting records, only accounting records for the state, local
governments, and enterprises. From the central government to the village
committees in rural areas, the municipal officials are always ranked lower than
the communist cadres. The expenditures of the Party are supplied by the
municipal units and accounted for in the municipal system.
The organization of the CCP gives form to evil. The CCP attaches to every tiny
unit and penetrates deeply into every cell of the Chinese society, thereby
controlling the Chinese people and draining their energy.

This peculiar structure of evil possession has existed in human history in the
past, either partially or temporarily. Never has it operated for so long and
controlled a society so completely as under the rule of the Communist Party.
For this reason, Chinese farmers live in poverty and drudgery. They have to
support the traditional municipal officials as well as the many communist
cadres.
For this reason, Chinese workers are threatened by unemployment. The possessing
CCP has been extracting funds from their factories for many years.
For this reason, Chinese intellectuals find it so difficult to gain intellectual
freedom. In addition to their administrators, there are CCP shadows lingering
everywhere, doing nothing but monitoring people.
According to modern political science, power comes from three main sources:
force, wealth, and knowledge. The Communist Party has never hesitated to use
violence to rob people of their property. More importantly, they have deprived
people of their freedoms of speech and of the press. The CCP’s evil possession
controls society so tightly that it can hardly be compared to any other regime
in the world.
VII. Getting Rid of the CCP’s Control
All things under heaven experience a life cycle of birth, maturity, decay, and
death.
Since Marx revealed the haunting by the communist specter more than a century
ago, the Communist Party spread around the world like an epidemic, killing
hundreds of millions of lives and taking away property and freedom.
The basic tenet of the Communist Party is to take away all private property so
as to eliminate the exploitative class. Private property is the basis of all
social rights, and often carries national culture. People who are robbed of
private property also lose the freedom of mind and spirit. They may further lose
the freedom to acquire social and political rights.
Facing a crisis of survival, the CCP was forced to reform China’s economy in the
1980s. Some of the rights to private property were restored to the people. This
created a hole in the massive CCP machine of precise control. This hole has
become enlarged as the CCP’s members strive to accumulate their private
fortunes.
The CCP parasite, supported by force, deception and the frequent change of
principles, has now shown signs of decay, nervous at every slight disturbance.
It attempts to survive by accumulating more wealth and tightening control, but
these actions only serve to intensify the crisis.
Today’s China appears prosperous, but social conflicts have been built up to a
level never seen before. Using political techniques from the past, the CCP may
attempt some sort of retreat, reversing its previous persecution of the
Tiananmen Square democratic movement, or of Falun Gong, and making another group
its chosen enemy, thereby continuing to exercise the power of terror.
Facing challenges over the past one hundred years, the Chinese nation has
responded by importing weapons, reforming its systems, and enacting extreme and
violent revolutions. Countless lives have been lost, and the Chinese traditional
culture has been abandoned. It appears that the responses have failed. When
agitation and anxiety occupied the Chinese mind, the CCP took the opportunity to
enter the scene, and has controlled this ancient civilization ever since.
In future challenges, the Chinese people will inevitably have to choose again.
No matter how the choice is made, every Chinese citizen must understand that any
lingering hope in the CCP will only worsen the damage done to the Chinese nation
and inject new energy into the possessing CCP.
We must abandon all illusions and make our own observations and decisions. Only
then can we rid ourselves of the nightmarish control by the CCP over the last 50
years. In the name of a free nation, we can reestablish the Chinese civilization
based on respect for human nature and compassion for all.


Epoch Times Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party - Part 2


The Beginnings of the Chinese Communist Party
Foreword
According to the book Explaining Simple and Analyzing Compound Characters
(Shuowen Jiezi) written by Xu Shen (d. 147 AD), the traditional Chinese
character Dang, meaning “party” or “gang,” consists of two radicals that
correspond to “promote or advocate” and “dark or black” respectively. Putting
the two radicals together, the character means “promoting darkness.” “Party” or
“party member” (which can also be interpreted as “gang” or “gang member”)
carries a derogatory meaning. Confucius said, “I heard that a noble man would
not join a gang (party).” In the Analects (Lunyu), Confucius’ interpretation of
this character explains that people who help one another conceal their crimes
and do bad things are said to be forming a gang (party). It is a synonym for
“gang of scoundrels” and is associated with the implication of ganging up for
selfish purposes.
Why did the Communist Party emerge and eventually seize power in modern China?
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has constantly instilled into the Chinese
people’s minds that history has chosen the CCP, that the people have chosen the
CCP, and that “without the CCP there would be no new China.”
Did the Chinese people choose the Communist Party of their own initiative? Or,
did the Communist Party force its selfish interests and its views upon the
Chinese people? We must find answers from history.
From the late Qing Dynasty to the early years of the Republic period
(1911-1949), China experienced tremendous external shocks and extensive attempts
at internal reform. Chinese society was in painful turmoil. Many intellectuals
and people with lofty ideals wanted to save the country and its people, but in
the midst of national crisis and chaos, their sense of anxiety grew, leading
first to disappointment and then complete despair. Like people who turn to any
available doctor in times of illness, they looked outside China for their
solutions. When the British and French styles failed, they switched to the
Russian method. Anxious to succeed, they did not hesitate to prescribe the most
extreme remedy for the illness, in the hope that China would quickly become
strong.
The May Fourth movement of 1919 was a thorough reflection of this despair. Some
people advocated anarchism; others proposed to overthrow the doctrines of
Confucius, and still others suggested bringing in foreign culture. In short,
they rejected Chinese traditional culture and opposed the Confucian doctrine of
the middle way. Eager to take a shortcut, they advocated the destruction of
everything traditional. On the one hand the radical members among them did not
have a way to serve the country, and on the other hand they believed firmly in
their own ideals. They felt the world was hopeless, believing that only by
themselves could they find the correct approach to China’s future development.
They were passionate for revolution and violence.
Different experiences led to different theories, principles and paths among
various groups. Eventually a group of people met Communist Party representatives
from the Soviet Union. The idea of "using violent revolution to seize political
power," lifted from the theory of Marxism-Leninism, appealed to their anxious
minds and conformed to their desire to save the country and its people. Hence,
they introduced Communism, a completely foreign concept, into China. Altogether
13 representatives attended the first CCP Congress. Later, some of them died,
some ran away, some worked for the occupying Japanese force and became traitors,
and some quit the CCP to join the Kuomintang (the Nationalist Party, hereafter
referred to as KMT). By 1949 when the CCP came to power, only Mao Zedong (also
spelled Mao Tse Tung) and Dong Biwu still remained of the original 13 Party
members. It is unclear whether the founders of the CCP were aware at the time
that the “deity” they had introduced from the Soviet Union was in reality an
evil specter, and the remedy they sought for strengthening the nation was
actually a deadly poison.
The All-Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik) (later known as the Communist Party
of the Soviet Union), having just won its revolution, was obsessed with
ambitions for China. In 1920, the Soviet Union established the Far Eastern
Bureau in Siberia, a branch of the Third Communist International, or the
Comintern. It was responsible for managing the establishment of a Communist
party in China and other countries. Soon after its establishment, the bureau’s
deputy manager Grigori Voitinsky arrived in Beijing and contacted the Communist
vanguard Li Dazhao. Li arranged for Voitinsky to meet with another Communist
leader, Chen Duxiu, in Shanghai. In August of 1920, Voitinsky, Chen Duxiu, Li
Hanjun, Shen Xuanlu, Yu Xiusong, Shi Cuntong and others began to prepare for the
establishment of the CCP.
In June of 1921, Zhang Tailei arrived at Irkutsk in Siberia, whereupon he
submitted a proposal to the Far Eastern Bureau proposing to establish the CCP as
a branch of the Comintern. On July 23, 1921, under the help of Nikolsky and
Maring from the Far East Bureau, the CCP was officially formed.
The Communist movement was then introduced to China as an experiment, and ever
since, the CCP has set itself above all, conquering all in its path, thereby
bringing endless catastrophe to China.
******************
I. The CCP Grew by Steadily Accumulating Wickedness
It is not an easy task to introduce a foreign specter such as the Communist
Party, one that is totally incompatible with the Chinese tradition, into China,
a country with a history of 5,000 years of civilization. Throughout the history
of the CCP, from its establishment to its gaining and maintaining political
power, it has gradually become increasingly wicked. In this development the CCP
has made use of the nine inherited character traits that the Communist specter
brought with it: evil, deceit, incitement, unleashing the scum of society,
espionage, robbery, fighting, elimination, and control. Responding to continuous
crises, the CCP has further consolidated and strengthened the means and extent
to which these malignant characteristics have been playing out.
First Inherited Trait: Evil—Putting on the Evil Form of Marxism-Leninism
Marxism initially attracted the Chinese Communists with its declaration to “use
violent revolution to destroy the old state apparatus and to establish a
proletariat dictatorship.” This is precisely the root of evil in Marxism and
Leninism.
Marxist materialism is predicated on the narrow economic concepts of forces of
production, production relations, and surplus value. During the early,
underdeveloped stages of capitalism, Marx made a shortsighted prediction that
capitalism would die and the proletariat would win, which has now been proven
wrong. Marxist-Leninist violent revolution and proletarian dictatorship promote
power-politics and proletarian domination. The Communist Manifesto related the
Communist Party's historical and philosophical basis to class conflict and
struggle. The proletariat broke free from traditional morals and social
relations for the sake of seizing power. Upon their first appearance, the
doctrines of Communism are set in opposition to all tradition.
Human nature universally repels violence. Violence makes people ruthless and
tyrannical. Thus, in all places and all times humanity has fundamentally
rejected the premises of the Communist Party’s theory of violence, a theory that
has no antecedent in any former systems of thought, philosophy, or tradition.
The Communist system of terror fell upon the earth as if from nowhere.
The CCP’s ideology is built on the premise that humans can conquer nature and
transform the world. The Communist Party attracted many people with its ideals
of "emancipating all mankind” and “world unity.” The CCP deceived many people,
especially those who were concerned about the human condition and were eager to
make their own mark in society. Thereafter, these people forgot that there is a
heaven above. Inspired by the beautiful yet misguided notion of “building heaven
on earth,” they despised traditions and looked down upon the lives of others,
which in turn degraded themselves. They did all of this in an attempt to provide
the CCP with praiseworthy service and gain honor.
The Communist Party presented the fantasy of a “Communist paradise” as the
truth, and aroused people’s enthusiasm to fight for it: “For reason thunders new
creation, `Tis a better world in birth.” [1] Employing such an absolute and
incredible idea, the CCP severed the connections between humanity and heaven,
and cut the lifeline that connects the Chinese people to their ancestors and
national traditions. By summoning people to give their lives for Communism, the
CCP strengthened its ability to do harm.
Second Inherited Trait: Deceit—Lying in Order to Confound Good and Bad
Evil must lie. To take advantage of the working class, the CCP conferred upon it
the titles of “the most advanced class,” “selfless class,” “leading class,” and
“pioneers of the proletarian revolution.” When the Communist Party needed the
peasants, it promised “land to the tiller.” Mao applauded the peasants, saying,
“Without the poor peasants there would be no revolution; to deny their role is
to deny the revolution.”[2] When the Communist Party needed help from the
capitalist class, it called them “fellow travelers in the proletarian
revolution” and promised them “democratic republicanism.” When the Communist
Party was almost exterminated by the KMT, it appealed loudly, “Chinese do not
fight Chinese.” Yet what happened? As soon as the anti-Japanese war was over,
the CCP turned full force against the KMT and overthrew its government.
Similarly, the CCP eliminated the capitalist class shortly after taking control
of China, and in the end transformed the peasants and workers into a penniless
proletariat.
The notion of a united front is a typical example of the lies the CCP tells. In
order to win the civil war against the KMT, the CCP, departing from its usual
tactics, adopted a “policy of temporary unification” with its class enemies,
including landlords and rich farmers. On July 20, 1947, Mao Zedong announced
that “Except for a few reactionary elements, we should adopt a more relaxed
attitude towards the landlord class…in order to reduce hostile elements.” After
the CCP gained power, however, the landlords and rich farmers did not escape
genocide.
Saying one thing and doing another is normal for the Communist Party. When the
CCP needed to use the KMT, it argued that the two sides “strive for long-term
coexistence, exercise mutual supervision, be sincere with each other, and share
honor and disgrace.” After seizing power in 1949, however, the CCP eliminated
everyone who spoke up for democracy, labeling them anti-party rightists. Anybody
who disagreed with or refused to conform to the Party’s concepts, words, deeds,
or organization was eliminated. Marx, Lenin and the CCP leaders have all held
that the Communist Party's political power would not be shared with any other
individuals or groups. From the very beginning, Communism clearly carried within
it the gene of dictatorship. It is despotic; the CCP has never coexisted with
any other political parties or groups in a sincere manner. Even during the
so-called “relaxed” period, the CCP’s coexistence with others was at most a
choreographed performance.
History tells us not to believe in any promises the CCP makes, nor to trust that
any of the CCP’s commitments will be fulfilled. To believe the words of the
Communist Party could easily cost one his or her life.
Third Inherited Trait: Incitement—Stirring up Hatred and Inciting Struggle among
the Masses
Deceit often serves to incite hatred. Struggle relies on hatred. Where hatred
does not exist, it can be created.
The deep-rooted patriarchal clan system in the Chinese countryside served as a
fundamental barrier to the Communist Party’s establishment of political power.
The rural society was initially harmonious, and the relationship between the
landowners and tenants was not entirely confrontational. The landowners managed
and rented out land to peasants, who then relied on the land for survival. In
other words, the landowners offered the farmers a means to survive, and in
return the farmers supported the landowners.
This somewhat mutually dependent relationship was twisted by the CCP into
extreme class antagonism and class exploitation. Harmony was turned into
hostility, hatred, and struggle. The reasonable was made to be unreasonable,
order was made to be chaos, and republicanism made to be despotism. The
Communist Party encouraged the denial of private property, murder for profit,
and the slaughter of landlords, rich farmers and their families. Many peasants
were not willing to take the property of others. Some returned at night the
property they took from the landlords during the day, but they were criticized
by CCP work teams in rural regions as having “low class consciousness.”

To incite class hatred, the CCP reduced the Chinese theater to a propaganda
tool. A well-known story of class oppression, the White-Haired Girl, was
originally about a female immortal and had nothing to do with class conflicts.
Under the pens of the military writers, however, it was transformed into a
“modern” drama, opera, and ballet used to incite class hatred.
Inciting the masses to struggle against each other is a classic trick of the
CCP. The CCP created the 95:5 formula of class assignment: 95 percent of the
population was assigned to various classes that could be won over, while the
remaining 5 percent was designated as class enemies. People within the 95
percent were safe, but those within the 5 percent were “struggled” against. Out
of fear and to protect themselves, the people strived to be included in the 95
percent. This resulted in many cases in which people brought harm to others,
even adding insult to injury. The CCP has, through the use of incitement in many
of its political movements, perfected this technique.
Fourth Inherited Trait: Unleashing the Scum of Society—Hoodlums and Social Scum
Form the Ranks of the CCP
Unleashing the scum of society leads to evil, and evil must utilize the scum of
society. Communist revolutions have often made use of the rebellion of hoodlums
and social scum. The “Paris Commune,” for example, actually involved homicide,
arson, and violence led by social scum. Even Marx looked down upon the “lumpen
proletariat.” [3] In the Communist Manifesto, Marx said, “The ‘dangerous class,’
the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of
the old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a
proletarian revolution; its conditions of life, however, prepare it far more for
the part of a bribed tool of reactionary intrigue.” Peasants, on the other hand,
were considered by Marx and Engels to be unqualified to be any social class
because of their so-called fragmentation and ignorance.
The CCP developed further the dark side of Marx's theory. Mao Zedong said, “The
social scum and hoodlums have always been spurned by the society, but they are
actually the bravest, the most thorough and firmest in the revolution in the
rural areas.”[4] The lumpen proletariat enhanced the violent nature of the CCP.
The word “revolution” in Chinese literally means “taking lives,” which sounds
horrific and disastrous to all good people. However, the party managed to imbue
“revolution” with positive meaning. Similarly, in a debate over the term “lumpen
proletariat” during the Cultural Revolution, the CCP felt that “lumpen” did not
sound good, and so the CCP replaced it with “proletariat” simply.
Another behavior of the scum of society is to play the rascal. When criticized
for being dictators, Party officials would reveal their tendency to bully and
shamelessly pronounce something along the lines of, “You are right, that is
precisely what we are doing. The Chinese experience accumulated through the past
decades requires that we exercise this power of democratic dictatorship. We call
it the ‘people's democratic dictatorship.’”
Fifth Inherited Trait: Espionage—Infiltrate, Deceive, Betray
In addition to cheating, inciting violence, and employing the scum of society,
the technique of espionage and sowing dissension was also used. The CCP was
skillful in infiltration. Decades ago, the “top three” outstanding undercover
agents of the CCP, Qian Zhuangfei, Li Kenong and Hu Beifeng, were in fact
working for Chen Geng, the manager of the Number 2 Spy Branch of the Central
Committee of the CCP. When Qian Zhuangfei was working as a confidential
secretary and trusted subordinate of Xu Enzeng, the director of the
Investigation Office of the KMT, he used the letterhead of the KMT’s
Organization Department to write two letters containing the secret information
of the KMT’s first and second strategic plans to have Jiangxi province encircled
by the KMT troops, and had them hand delivered to Zhou Enlai (also spelled as
Chou En-lai) [5] by Li Kenong. In April 1930, a special double-agent
organization funded by the Central Investigation Branch of the KMT was set up in
the Northeast region of China. On the surface, it belonged to the KMT and was
managed by Qian Zhuangfei, but behind the scenes it was controlled by the CCP
and led by Chen Geng.
Li Kenong joined KMT’s Armed Force Headquarters as a cryptographer. Li was the
one that decoded the urgent message pertaining to the arrest and revolt of Gu
Shunzhang [6], a CCP Security Bureau Director. Qian Zhuangfei immediately sent
the decoded message to Zhou Enlai, thereby keeping the whole lot of spies from
being caught in a dragnet.

Yang Dengying was a pro-Communist special representative for the KMT’s Central
Investigation Office stationed in Shanghai. The CCP let him arrest and execute
those who the CCP considered unreliable. A senior officer from Henan Province
once offended a party cadre, and his own people pulled some strings to put him
in the KMT's jail for several years.
During the Liberation War [7], the CCP managed to plant a secret agent whom
Chiang Kai-shek (also called Jiang Jieshi) [8] kept in close confidence. Liu
Pei, Lieutenant General and the Deputy Minister of the Department of Defense was
in charge of dispatching the KMT army. Liu was in fact an undercover agent for
the CCP. Before the KMT army found out about their next assignment, the
information about the planned location of the army’s deployment had already
reached Yan’an, headquarter of the CCP. The Communist Party would come up with a
plan of defense accordingly. Xiong Xianghui, a secretary and trusted subordinate
of Hu Zongnan [9], revealed Hu’s plan to invade Yan’an to Zhou Enlai. When Hu
Zongnan and his forces reached Yan’an, it was deserted. Zhou Enlai once said,
“Chairman Mao knew the military orders issued by Chiang Kai-shek before they
ever made it to Chiang’s army commander.”
Sixth Inherited Trait: Robbery—Plundering by Tricks or Violence Becomes a “New
Order”
When the CCP pulled the Red Army together to establish its rule through military
force, they needed money for arms and ammunition, food and clothes. The CCP
resorted to “fund raising” mainly in the form of suppressing the local tyrants
and robbing banks, behaving just like bandits. Soon these “fund raising”
missions became one of the major tasks of the Red Army. For example, in a
mission led by Li Xiannian, one of the CCP’s senior leaders, the Red Army
kidnapped the richest families in county seats in the area of western Hubei
province. They did not just kidnap one single person, but one from every rich
family in the clan. Those kidnapped were kept alive to be ransomed back to their
families for continued monetary support of the army. It was not until either the
Red Army was satisfied or the kidnapped families were completely drained of
resources that the hostages were sent home, many at their last gasp. Some had
been terrorized so badly that they died before they could return.
Through “cracking down on the local tyrants and confiscating their lands,” the
CCP extended the tricks and violence of their plunder to the whole society,
replacing tradition with “the new order.” The Communist Party has committed all
manner of ill deeds, large and small, while it has done no good at all. It
offers small favors to everyone in order to incite some to denounce others. As a
result, compassion and virtue disappear completely, and are replaced with strife
and killing. The “communist utopia” is actually a euphemism for violent plunder.

Seventh Inherited Trait: Fighting—Destroys the National System, Traditional
Ranks and Orders
Deceit, incitement, unleashing social scum, and espionage are all for the
purpose of robbing and fighting. Communist philosophy promotes fighting. The
Communist revolution was absolutely not just some disorganized beating, smashing
and robbing. The Party said “The main targets of peasants’ attack are local
tyrants, the evil gentry and lawless landlords, but in passing they also struck
out against all kinds of patriarchal ideas and institutions, against the corrupt
officials in the cities and against the bad practices and customs in the rural
areas.” [4] An organized effort was launched to destroy the entire traditional
system and the customs of the countryside.
Communist fighting also includes armed forces and armed struggle. “A revolution
is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing
embroidery; it cannot be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate,
kind, courteous, restrained and magnanimous. A revolution is an insurrection, an
act of violence by which one class overthrows another.”[4] Fighting is
inevitable when attempting to seize state power by force. A few decades later,
the CCP used the same characteristic of fighting to “educate” the next
generation during the Great Cultural Revolution.
Eighth Inherited Trait: Elimination—Establishes a Complete Ideology of Genocide
Communism has done many things with absolute cruelty. The CCP promised the
intellectuals a “heaven on earth.” Later it labeled them “rightist” and put them
into the infamous ninth category [10] of persecuted people, alongside landlords
and spies. It deprived capitalists of their property, exterminated the wealthy
landlord class, destroyed rank and order in the countryside, took authority away
from local figures, kidnapped and extorted bribes from the richer people,
brainwashed war prisoners, “reformed” industrialists and capitalists,
infiltrated the KMT and disintegrated it, split from the Communist International
and betrayed it, cleaned out all dissidents through successive political
movements after it came to power in 1949, and threatened its own members with
coercion.
The above-mentioned occurrences were all based on the CCP’s theory of genocide.
Its every political movement in the past was a campaign of terror with genocidal
intent. The CCP started to build its theoretical system of genocide at its early
stage as a composite of its theories on class, revolution, struggle, violence,
dictatorship, movements, and political parties. It encompasses all of the
experiences it has embraced and accumulated through its various genocidal
practices.
The essential expression of CCP genocide is the extermination of conscience and
independent thought. In this way a ‘reign by terror’ serves the fundamental
interests of the CCP. The CCP will not only eliminate you if you are against it,
but it may also destroy you even if you are for it. It will eliminate whomever
it deems should be eliminated. Consequently, everyone lives in the shadow of
terror and fears the CCP.
Ninth Inherited Trait: Control – The Use of Party Nature to Control the Entire
Party, and Subsequently the Rest of Society
All of the inherited characteristics aim to achieve a single goal: to control
the populace through the use of terror. Through its evil actions, the CCP has
proved itself to be the natural enemy of all existing social forces. Since its
inception, the CCP has struggled through one crisis after another, among which
the crisis of survival has been the most critical. The CCP exists in a state of
perpetual fear for its survival. Its sole purpose has been to maintain its own
existence and power—its own highest benefit. To supplement its declining power
the CCP is forced to update its superficial elements on a regular basis. The
Party’s benefit is not that of any single Party member or of any individual.
Rather, it is the benefit of the Party as a collective entity, as a whole. The
collective identity of the CCP overrides any sense of the individual.
“Party nature” has been the most vicious characteristic of this evil specter.
Party nature overwhelms human nature so completely that the Chinese people are
no longer free to speak or act. For instance, Zhou Enlai and Sun Bingwen were
once comrades. After Sun Bingwen died, Zhou Enlai took his daughter, Sun Weishi,
as his adopted daughter. During the Great Cultural Revolution, Sun Weishi was
reprimanded. She later died in custody from a long nail driven into the head.
Her arrest warrant had been signed by her stepfather, Zhou Enlai.
One of the early leaders of the CCP was Ren Bishi, who was in charge of opium
sales during the anti-Japanese war. Opium was a symbol of foreign invasion at
that time, as the British used opium imports to China to drain Chinese economy
and turn Chinese people into addicts. Despite the strong national sentiment
against opium, Ren dared to plant opium in a large area, risking universal
condemnation. Due to the sensitive and illegal nature of the opium dealings, the
CCP used the word “soap” as a code-word for opium. The CCP used the revenue from
the illicit drug trade with bordering countries to fund its existence. At the
Centenary of the Birth of Ren, one of the new generation of Chinese leaders
highly praised Ren’s aptitude for the Party, claiming that, “Ren possessed
superior character and was a model Party member. He also had a firm belief in
Communism and unlimited loyalty to the cause of the Party.”
Another example of good aptitude for the Party was Zhang Side. The Party said
that he was killed by the sudden collapse of a kiln, but others claimed that he
died while roasting opium. Since he was a quiet person, having served in the
Central Guard Division and having never asked for a promotion, it was said, “his
death is weightier than Taishan,” [11] meaning that his life held the greatest
importance.
Lei Feng was also known famously as the “screw that never rusts, functioning in
the revolutionary machine.” For a long period of time, both Lei and Zhang were
used as models to educate the Chinese people to be loyal to the Party. Many
Party heroes were used to model the “iron will and principle of the Party
spirit.”
Upon gaining power, the CCP launched an aggressive campaign of mind control to
mold many new “tools” and “screws” from the successive generations. The Party
formed a set of “proper thoughts” and a range of stereotypical behaviors. These
protocols were initially used within the Party, but quickly expanded to the
entire public. Clothed in the name of the nation, these thoughts and actions
worked to brainwash people into complying with the evil of the CCP.
******************
II. The CCP’s Dishonorable Foundation
The CCP lays claim to a brilliant history, one that has seen victory after
victory. This is merely an attempt to prettify itself and glorify the CCP’s
image in the eyes of the public. As a matter of fact, the CCP has no glory to
advertise at all. Only by using the nine inherited evil traits could it
establish and maintain power.
Establishment of the CCP—Raised on the Breast of the Soviet Union
“With the report of the first canon during the October Revolution, it brought us
Marxism and Leninism.” That was how the Party portrayed itself to the people.
However, when the Party was first founded, it was just the Asian branch of the
Soviet Union. From the beginning, it was a traitorous party.
During the founding period of the Party, they had no money, no ideology, nor any
experience. They had no foundation upon which to support themselves. The CCP
joined the Comintern to link its destiny with the existing violent revolution.
The CCP’s violent revolution was just a descendent of Marx and Lenin’s
revolution. The CCP was simply an eastern branch of Soviet Communism, carrying
out the imperialism of the Russian Red Army. The Soviet Union secretly directed
the Chinese violent political takeover and its ensuing overthrow of the existing
political and organizational ideology. Through the use of extreme surveillance
and control measures, the Soviet Union was the backbone and patron of the CCP.
The Comintern formulated the CCP constitution established at the first CCP
conference. The manifestos of Marx and Lenin, the ideology of class from Soviet
Party principles, provided its fundamental basis. The soul of the CCP consists
of ideology imported from the Soviet Union. Chen Duxiu, one of the foremost
officials of the CCP, had different opinions from those of the international
Communist committee representative, Maring. Maring wrote a memo to Chen stating
that if Chen were a real member of the Communist Party, he must follow orders
from the Comintern. Even though Chen Duxiu was one of the CCP's founding
fathers, he could do nothing but listen and obey orders. Truly, he and his Party
were simply subordinates of the Soviet Union.
During the third CCP conference in 1923, Chen Duxiu publicly acknowledged that
the Party was funded almost entirely by contributions from the Soviet Comintern.
In one year, the committee contributed over 200,000 yuan to the CCP, with
unsatisfactory results. The Comintern accused the CCP of not being diligent
enough in their efforts.
According to declassified Party documents, the CCP received 16,655 Chinese yuan
from October 1921 to June 1922. In 1924 they received US$1,500 and 31,927.17
yuan, and in 1927 they received 187,674 yuan. The monthly contribution from the
Comintern averaged around 20,000 yuan. Tactics commonly used by the CCP today,
such as lobbying, going through the backdoor, offering bribes, and using
threats, were already in use back then. The Comintern accused the CCP of
continuously lobbying for funds.
“They have different organizations (International Communications Office,
representatives for the Comintern, and military organizations, etc.) to disburse
funds each time…the funny thing is, it doesn’t take long for our comrade
representatives to understand the psychology of our Soviet comrades. Most
importantly, they know in what situation and which comrade will be more likely
to approve the funding. Once they know that they won’t be able to get it, they
delay meetings. In the end they use the cruelest methods, like spreading rumors
that some grass-root officials have conflicts with the Soviets, and that money
is being given to warlords instead of the CCP.”
The First KMT and CCP Alliance—A Parasite Infiltrates to the Core and Sabotages
the Northern Expedition [12]
The CCP has always taught its people that Chiang Kai-shek betrayed the National
Revolution movement [13], forcing the CCP to rise in armed revolt.
In reality, the CCP behaved like a parasite. It cooperated with the KMT in the
first KMT-CCP alliance for the sake of expanding its influence by taking
advantage of the national revolution. Moreover, the CCP was eager to launch the
Soviet-supported revolution and seize power, and its desire for power in fact
destroyed and betrayed the National Revolution movement.
At the second national representatives conference of the CCP, held in July 1922,
those opposing the alliance with the KMT dominated the conference, because the
conference members were anxious to seize power. However, the Comintern in fact
controlled events behind the scenes, and vetoed the resolution reached in the
conference; it ordered the CCP to join the KMT.
During the first KMT-CCP alliance, the CCP held its fourth national
representatives conference in Shanghai in January 1925. At that time, the CCP
had only 994 members, but the Party raised the question of leadership in China.
Chiang Kai-shek was not the cause of the CCP revolt. Had Sun Yat-sen [14] not
died, he would have been the target the CCP aimed at in its quest for power.
With the support of the Soviet Union, the CCP seized political power inside the
KMT during its alliance with the CCP. Tang Pingshan became the minister of the
Central Personnel Department of the KMT. Feng Jupo, secretary of the Ministry of
Labor, was granted full power to deal with all labor-related affairs. Lin Zuhan
was the Minister of Rural Affairs, while Peng Pai was secretary of this
Ministry. Mao Zedong assumed the position of acting propaganda minister of the
KMT Propaganda Ministry. The military schools and leadership of the military
were always the focus of the CCP: Zhou Enlai held the position of director of
the Politics Department of the Huangpu (Whampoa) Military Academy, and Zhang
Shenfu was its associate director. Zhou Enlai was also Chief of the Judge
Advocates Section, and he planted Russian military advisers here and there. Many
Communists held the positions of political instructors and faculty in KMT
military schools. CCP members also served as KMT Party representatives at
various levels of the National Revolutionary Army. [15] It was also stipulated
that without a Party representative’s signature, no order would be deemed
effective. As a result of this parasitic attachment to the National Revolution
movement, the number of the CCP members increased drastically from less than
1000 in 1925 to 30,000 by 1928.
The Northern Expedition started in February of 1926. However, from October 1926
to March 1927, the CCP launched three armed rebellions in Shanghai. Later, it
attacked the Northern Expedition military headquarters but failed. Zhou Enlai,
who used the alias Wu Hao, was caught and later released after he published his
repentance and acknowledged his wrongdoings. The pickets for the general strikes
in Guangdong province engaged in violent conflicts with the police every day,
and the KMT reinforced the police patrol with army soldiers and in the meantime
dispatched secret agents to monitor the people who were agitating the masses.
Such uprisings caused the April 12 purge of the CCP by the KMT. [16]
In August 1927, the CCP members within the KMT Revolutionary Army initiated the
Nanchang Rebellion, which was quickly suppressed. In September, the CCP launched
the Autumn Harvest Uprising to attack Changsha, but that attack was suppressed
as well. The CCP began to implement a network of control in the army whereby
“Party branches are established at the level of the company,” and it fled to the
Jinggangshan area, establishing rule over the countryside there.
The Hunan Peasant Rebellion—Inciting the Scum of Society to Revolt
During the Northern Expedition, the CCP instigated rebellions in the rural areas
in an attempt to capture power, while the National Revolutionary Army was at war
with the warlords.
The Hunan Peasant Rebellion in 1927 was a revolt of the riffraff, the scum of
society, as was the famous Paris Commune of 1871—the first Communist revolt.
French nationals and foreigners in Paris at the time witnessed that the Paris
Commune was a group of destructive roving bandits, having no vision. Living in
exquisite buildings and large mansions and eating extravagant and luxurious
meals, they cared only about enjoying their momentary happiness and worried
about nothing ahead. During the rebellion of the Paris Commune, they censored
the Press. They took as hostage and later shot the Archbishop of Paris, Georges
Darboy, who gave sermons to the King. For their personal enjoyment they cruelly
killed 64 clergymen, set fire to palaces, and destroyed government offices,
private residences, monuments, and inscription columns. The wealth and beauty of
the French capital had been second to none in Europe. However, during the Paris
Commune uprising, buildings were reduced to ashes and people to skeletons. Such
atrocities and cruelty had rarely been seen throughout history.
As Mao Zedong admitted,
It is true the peasants are in a sense unruly in the countryside. Supreme in
authority, the peasant association allowed the landlord no say and sweeps away
his prestige. This amounts to striking the landlord down to the dust and keeping
him there. The peasants threaten, ‘We will put you on the other list (the list
of reactionaries)!’ They fine the local tyrants and evil gentry, they demand
contributions from them, and they smash their sedan-chairs. People swarm into
the houses of local tyrants and evil gentry who are against the peasant
association, slaughter their pigs and consume their grain. They even loll on the
ivory-inlaid beds belonging to the young ladies in the households. At the
slightest provocation they make arrests, crown the arrested with tall paper
hats, and parade them through the village, saying, “You dirty landlords, now you
know who we are!” Doing whatever they like and turning everything upside down,
they have created a kind of terror in the countryside.
But Mao gave such “unruly” actions a full approval, saying,
To put it bluntly, it is necessary to create terror for a while in every rural
area, or otherwise it would be impossible to suppress the activities of the
counter-revolutionary in the countryside or overthrow the authority of the
gentry. Proper limits have to be exceeded in order to right the wrong, or else
the wrong cannot be righted... Many of their deeds in the period of
revolutionary action, which were seen as going too far, were in fact the very
things the revolution required.[4]
Communist revolution creates a system of terror.
The “Anti-Japanese” North-Bound Operation—the Flight of the Defeated
The CCP labeled the “Long March” as a northbound anti-Japanese operation. It
trumpeted the “Long March” as a Chinese revolutionary fairy tale. It claimed
that the “Long March” was a “manifesto,” a “propaganda team” and a “seeding
machine,” which ended with the CCP’s victory and their enemies’ defeat.
The CCP fabricated such obvious lies about marching north to fight the Japanese
to cover its failures. From October 1933 to January 1934, the Communist Party
suffered a total defeat. In the fifth operation by the KMT, which aimed to
encircle and annihilate the CCP, the CCP lost its rural strongholds one after
another. With its base areas continually shrinking, the main Red Army had to
flee. This is the true origin of the “Long March.”
The “Long March” was in fact aimed at breaking out of the encirclement and
fleeing to Outer Mongolia and Soviet Russia along an arc that first went west
and then north. Once in place, the CCP could escape into the Soviet Union in
case of defeat. The CCP encountered great difficulties when en route towards
Outer Mongolia. They chose to go through Shanxi and Suiyuan. On the one hand by
marching through these northern provinces, they could claim to be
“anti-Japanese” and win people’s hearts. On the other hand, those areas were
safe as no Japanese troops were deployed there. The territory along the Great
Wall was occupied by the Japanese army. A year later, when the CCP finally
arrived at Shanbei (northern Shaanxi province), the main force of the Central
Red Army had decreased from 80,000 to 6,000 people.
The Xi'an Incident—the CCP Latches onto the KMT a Second Time
In December 1936, Zhang Xueliang and Yang Hucheng, two KMT generals, kidnapped
Chiang Kai-shek in Xi'an. This has since been referred to as the Xi'an Incident.

According to the version of history presented in CCP textbooks, the Xi’an
Incident was a “military coup” initiated by Zhang and Yang, who delivered a life
or death ultimatum to Chiang Kai-shek. He was forced to take a stance against
the Japanese invaders. Zhou Enlai was reportedly invited to Xi’an as a CCP
representative to help negotiate a peaceful resolution. With different groups in
China mediating, the incident was resolved peacefully, thereby ending a civil
war of ten years and starting a unified national alliance against the Japanese.
The CCP history books say that this incident was a crucial turning point for
China in her crisis. The CCP depicts itself as the patriotic party that takes
the interests of the whole nation into account.
In fact, at the beginning of the incident, the leaders of the CCP wanted to kill
Chiang Kai-shek, avenging his earlier suppression of the CCP. At the time, the
CCP had a very weak base in northern Shaanxi province, and had been in danger of
being completely eliminated in a single battle. So the CCP, utilizing all its
acquired skills of deception, instigated Zhang and Yang to revolt. In order to
pin down the Japanese and prevent them from attacking the Soviet Union, Stalin
wrote to the Central Committee of the CCP, asking them not to kill Chiang
Kai-shek, but to cooperate with him for a second time. Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai
realized that they could not destroy the KMT with the limited strength of the
CCP; even if they killed Chiang Kai-shek, they would be defeated and even
eliminated by the avenging KMT army. Under these circumstances, the CCP changed
its tone. The CCP demanded joint resistance against the Japanese and forced
Chiang Kai-shek to accept cooperation a second time.
Many CCP spies had already gathered around Yang Hucheng and Zhang Xueliang
before the Xi'an Incident. One example was the underground CCP member Liu Ding,
who was introduced to Zhang Xueliang by Song Qingling, wife of Sun Yat-sen, a
sister of Madame Chiang and a CCP member. Liu played such an important role in
instigating the Xi'an Incident that Mao Zedong later praised his outstanding
service. Among those working at Yang Hucheng’s side, his own wife Xie Baozhen
was a CCP member and worked in Yang’s Political Department of the Army. Xie
married Yang Hucheng in January of 1928 with the approval of the CCP. In
addition, CCP member Wang Bingnan was an honored guest in Yang’s home at the
time. Wang later became a vice minister for the CCP Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
It was these CCP members around Yang and Zhang who directly instigated the coup.

The CCP first instigated a revolt, pointing the gun at Chiang Kai-shek, but then
turned around and, acting like a stage hero, forced him to accept the CCP. In
such a way the CCP not only escaped a crisis of disintegration, but also used
the opportunity to latch onto the KMT government for the second time. The Red
Army was soon turned into the Eighth Route Army, bigger and more powerful than
before. One must admire the CCP’s unmatchable skills of deception.
Anti-Japanese War—The CCP Grows by Killing with Borrowed Weapons
The textbooks of the CCP claim that the Communist Party led the Chinese victory
in the anti-Japanese war.
In reality, however, when the anti-Japanese war broke out, the KMT had more than
1.7 million armed soldiers, ships with 110,000 tons displacement, and about 600
fighter planes of various kinds. In comparison, the total size of the CCP’s New
Fourth Army, newly grouped in November of 1937, did not exceed 70,000 people,
and its power was weakened further by internal fractional politics. The CCP
realized that if it were to face battle with the Japanese, its power would be
diminished. In the eyes of the CCP, sustaining its own power rather than
ensuring the survival of the nation was the central focus of the emphasis on
“national unity.” Therefore, during its cooperation with the KMT, the CCP
exercised an undisclosed internal policy of giving priority to the struggle for
political power.
After the Japanese occupied the city of Shenyang on September 18, 1931, thereby
extending their control over large areas in northeastern China, the CCP fought
practically shoulder to shoulder with Japanese invaders to defeat the KMT. In a
declaration written in response to the Japanese occupation, the CCP exhorted the
people in the KMT-controlled area to rebel, calling on “workers to strike,
peasants to make trouble, students to boycott classes, poor people to quit
working, soldiers to revolt” so as to overthrow the Nationalist government.
Though the CCP held up a banner calling for resistance to the Japanese, they
only had local armies and guerrilla forces in camps away from the front lines.
Except for several battles, including the one fought at Pingxing Pass, the CCP
did not make much of a contribution to the war against the Japanese. Instead,
they spent their energy expanding their own base. When the Japanese surrendered,
the CCP incorporated the surrendering soldiers into its army, claiming to have
expanded to more than 900,000 regular soldiers, in addition to 2 million militia
fighters. The KMT army was essentially alone on the frontlines while fighting
the Japanese, losing over 200 generals in the war. The commanding officers on
the CCP side, however, bore nearly no losses. Even so, the CCP constantly
claimed that the KMT did not resist the Japanese, and that it was the CCP that
led the great victory in the anti-Japanese war.
Rectification in Yan’an—Creating the Most Fearsome Methods in Persecution
The CCP attracted countless patriotic youth to Yan’an in the name of fighting
against the Japanese, but then persecuted thousands of them during the
rectification movement enacted on what became known as “revolutionary holy
land.” Since gaining control of China, the CCP has continued to depict Yan’an as
the revolutionary “holy land,” but has not made any mention of the crimes it
committed during the rectification.
The rectification movement in Yan’an was the largest, darkest and most ferocious
power game ever played out in the human world. In the name of cleansing petty
bourgeoisie toxins, the Party washed away morality, independence of thought,
freedom of action, tolerance, and dignity. The first step of the rectification
was to set up, for each person, personnel archives, which included: 1) a
personal statement; 2) a chronicle of one's political life; 3) family background
and social relationships; 4) autobiography and ideological transformation; 5)
evaluation according to the Party nature.
In the personnel archive, one had to list all acquaintances since birth, all
important events and the time and place of their occurrence. People were asked
to write repeatedly for the archive, and any omissions would be seen as signs of
impurity. One had to describe all social activities they had ever participated
in, especially those related to joining the Party. The emphasis was placed on
personal thought processes during these social activities. Evaluation based on
Party nature was even more important, and one had to confess any anti-Party
thoughts or behavior in one’s consciousness, speech, work attitudes, everyday
life, or social activities. In evaluation of one’s consciousness, one was
required to scrutinize whether one had been concerned for self-interest, whether
one had used work for the Party to reach personal goals, whether one had wavered
in trust in the revolutionary future, feared death during battles, or missed
family members and spouses. There were no objective standards, so nearly
everyone was found to have problems.
Coercion was used to extract “confessions” from cadres who were being inspected
in order to eliminate “hidden traitors.” Countless frame-ups, false and wrong
accusations resulted, and a large number of cadres were persecuted. During the
rectification, Yan’an was called “a place for purging human nature.” A work team
entered the University of Military Affairs and Politics to examine the cadres'
personal histories, causing bloody terror for two months. Various methods were
used to extract confessions. People were ordered to confess and shown how to
confess. There were “group persuasions,” “five-minute persuasions,” private
advice, conference reports, and identifying the “radishes” (i.e., red outside
and white inside). There was also “picture taking”—lining up everyone on the
stage for examination. Those who appeared nervous were identified as suspects
and targeted as objects to be investigated.
Even representatives from the Comintern recoiled at the methods used during the
rectification, saying that the Yan’an situation was depressing. People did not
dare interact with one another. Each person had their own axe to grind and
everyone was nervous and frightened. No one dared to speak the truth or protect
mistreated friends, because each was trying to save his own life. The
vicious—those who flattered, lied, and insulted others—were promoted;
humiliation became a fact of life in Yan’an. People were pushed to the brink of
insanity, having been forced to abandon dignity, a sense of honor or shame, and
love for one another. They ceased to express their own opinions, but recited
party leaders’ articles instead.
This same system of oppression has been employed in all CCP political activities
since it seized power in China.
Three Years of Civil War—Betraying the Country to Seize Power
The Russian bourgeois revolution in February 1917 was a relatively mild
uprising. The Tsar placed the interests of the country first and surrendered the
throne instead of resisting. Lenin hurriedly returned to Russia from Germany,
staged another coup and murdered the revolutionaries of the capitalist class who
had overthrown the Tsar, thus strangling Russia’s bourgeois revolution. The CCP,
like Lenin, picked the fruits of a nationalist revolution. After the
anti-Japanese war was over, the CCP launched a revolutionary war to overthrow
the KMT government, bringing the disaster of war to China once more.
The CCP is adept at manipulating the masses. In several battles with the KMT,
including those fought in Liaoxi-Shenyang, Beijing-Tianjin, and Huai Hai, the
CCP used primitive, barbarous, and inhumane tactics that sacrificed its own
people. When besieging Changchun, in order to exhaust the food supply in the
city, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forbade ordinary people from leaving
the city. During the two months of Changchun’s besiegement, nearly 200,000
people died of hunger and frost. But the PLA did not allow people to leave.
After the battle was over, the CCP, without a tinge of shame, claimed that they
had "liberated Changchun without firing a shot."
From 1947 to 1948, the CCP signed the "Harbin Agreement" and the "Moscow
Agreement" with the Soviet Union, surrendering national assets and giving away
resources from the Northeast in exchange for the Soviet Union’s full support in
foreign relations and military affairs. According to the agreements, the Soviet
Union would supply the CCP with airplanes; it would give the CCP weapons left by
the surrendered Japanese in two installments; and it would sell the
Soviet-controlled ammunition and military supplies in China’s Northeast to the
CCP at low prices. If the KMT launched an amphibious landing in the Northeast,
the Soviet Union would secretly support the CCP army. In addition, the Soviet
Union would help the CCP gain control over Xinjiang; the CCP and the Soviet
Union would build an allied air force; the Soviets would help equip 11 divisions
of the CCP army, and transport one-third of its US-supplied weapons (worth $13
billion) into Northeast China.
To gain Soviet support, the CCP promised the Soviet Union special transportation
privileges in the Northeast both on land and in the air; offered the Soviet
Union information about the actions of both the KMT government and the US
military; provided the Soviet Union with products from the Northeast (cotton,
soybeans) and military supplies in exchange for advanced weapons; granted the
Soviet Union preferential mining rights in China; allowed the Soviet Union to
station armies in the Northeast and Xinjiang; and permitted the Soviets to set
up the Far East Intelligence Bureau in China. If war broke out in Europe, the
CCP would send an expeditionary army of 100,000 plus 2 million laborers to
support the Soviet Union. In addition, the CCP promised to merge some special
regions in Liaoning province into North Korea if necessary.
******************
III. Demonstrating Evil Traits
Eternal Fear Marks the Party’s History
The most prominent characteristic of the CCP is its eternal fear, especially its
fear of losing power. Survival has been the CCP’s highest interest, which it has
supported with the use of force. The CCP is like a primary cancer cell that
diffuses and infiltrates every part of body, encroaching on and making
surrounding normal cells become cancerous. In our cycle of history, society
cannot dissolve such a mutated factor as the CCP and has no alternative but to
let it proliferate at will. As a result, much of society has become polluted,
and large areas have been flooded with Communism or communist elements. The
spreading of the CCP has fundamentally degraded the morality and society of
humankind.
The CCP doesn’t believe in the principles of morality and justice. All of its
principles are used entirely for its own interest. It is fundamentally selfish,
and there are no principles that could restrain and control its desires. Based
on its own principles, the Party needs to keep changing how it appears on the
surface, putting on new skins. During the early period when its survival was at
stake, the CCP attached to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, to the KMT,
to the KMT’s governing body, and to the National Revolution. After capturing
power, the CCP attached itself to various forms of opportunism, to the citizens’
minds and feelings, to social structures and means—to anything it could put its
hands on. It has utilized every crisis as an opportunity to gather wealth and to
strengthen its means of control.
The CCP’s “Magic Weapons”
The CCP claims that revolutionary victory depends on three “magic weapons”: the
Party’s construction, armed struggle, and united fronts. The experience with the
KMT offered the CCP two more such “weapons”: propaganda and espionage. The
Party’s various “magic weapons” have all been infused with the CCP’s nine
inherited traits: evil, deceit, incitement, unleashing the scum of society,
espionage, robbery, fighting, elimination, and control.
Marxism-Leninism is evil in its nature. Ironically, the Chinese Communists do
not really understand Marxism-Leninism. Lin Biao [17] said that there were very
few CCP members who had really read the works of Marx or Lenin. The public
considered Qu Qiubai [18] an ideologue, but he admitted to have only read a very
little of Marxism-Leninism. Mao Zedong’s ideology is a rural version of what
Marxism-Leninism advocates for rebellious peasants. Deng Xiaoping’s socialist
theory has capitalism as its last name. Jiang Zemin’s “Three Represents” [19]
was pieced together out of nothing. The CCP has never really understood what
Marxism-Leninism is, but has inherited from it the evil aspects, upon which the
CCP has foisted off its own even more wicked stuff.
The CCP’s united front is a conjunction of deceit and short-term pay-offs. The
goal of unity was to strengthen its power. By combining forces in battles
against the Japanese, the CCP could grow from a loner to a huge clan. Unity
required discernment—identifying who were enemies and who were friends; who were
on the left, in the middle, on the right; who should be befriended and when, and
who should be attacked and when. It easily turned former enemies into friends
and then back to enemies again. For example, during the period of the democratic
revolution, the party allied with the capitalists; during the socialist
revolution it eliminated the capitalists. In another example, leaders of other
parties such as Zhang Bojun and Luo Longji were made use of as supporters of the
CCP during the period of seizing state power, but later were persecuted as
“rightists.”
The Communist Party Is a Sophisticated Professional Gang
The Communist Party has used two-sided strategies, one side soft and flexible
and the other hard and stern. Its softer strategies include propaganda, united
fronts, espionage, double-dealing, getting into people's minds, brainwashing,
lies and deception, covering up the truth, psychological abuse, and generating
an atmosphere of terror. In doing these things, the CCP creates a syndrome of
fear inside the Party members’ hearts that leads them easily to forget the
Party’s mistakes. These myriad methods could stamp out human nature and foster
maliciousness in humanity. The CCP’s hard tactics include violence, persecution,
political movements, killing and destroying lives, kidnapping, suppressing
different voices, armed attacks, periodic crack-downs, etc. These aggressive
methods create and perpetuate terror.
The CCP uses both soft and hard methods concurrently. Sometimes they would be
relaxed in some instances while strict in others, or they would be relaxed on
the outside while stiff in their internal affairs. In a relaxed atmosphere, the
CCP encouraged the expression of different opinions, but, as if luring the snake
out of its hole, those who did speak up would only be persecuted in the
following period of strict control. The CCP often used democracy to challenge
the KMT, but when intellectuals in the CCP-controlled areas disagreed with the
party, they would be tortured or even beheaded. As an example, we can look at
the infamous “Wild Lilies incident”, in which the intellectual Wang Shiwei was
purged in the Yan’an rectification movement and executed by the CCP in 1947.
A veteran official who had suffered torments in the Yan’an Rectification
movement recalled that when he was under intense pressure, dragged and forced to
confess, the only thing he could do was to betray his own conscience and make up
lies. At first, he felt bad to be implicating and framing his fellow comrades.
He hated himself so much that he wanted to end his life. Coincidentally, a gun
had been placed on the table. He grabbed it and, pointing it at his head, pulled
the trigger. The gun had no bullets! The person who investigated him walked in
and said, “It’s good that you admitted what you’ve done was wrong. The Party’s
policies are lenient.” The Communist Party would know that you had reached your
limit, know that you were “loyal” to the Party, so you had passed the test.
Years later, this official learned about Falun Gong, a Qigong and cultivation
practice that started in China. He felt the practice to be good. When the
persecution of Falun Gong started, however, his painful memories of the past
revisited him, and he no longer dared to say that Falun Gong is good.
The experience of Emperor Puyi [20] was similar to this officer’s. Imprisoned in
the CCP’s cells and seeing other people killed, he thought that he would die
soon. In order to live, he allowed himself to be brainwashed and cooperated with
the prison guards. Later, he wrote an autobiography The First Half of My life,
which was used by the CCP as an example of ideological remolding.
According to modern medical studies, many victims of intense pressure and
isolation fall prey to an abnormal sense of dependency on their captors known as
the Stockholm Syndrom. The victims’ moods, happiness or anger, joy or sorrow,
would be dictated by those of their captors. The slightest favor for the victims
will be received with deep gratitude. There are accounts in which the victims
develop “love” for their captors. This psychological phenomenon has been long
known and successfully used by the CCP against its enemies and in controlling
the minds of its citizens.
The Communist Party Uses and Discards Its Leaders While Resisting Reform
The first ten general secretaries of the CCP have, without exception, all been
labeled anti-communists. Clearly, the CCP has a life of its own, and the party
runs the officials and not the other way around. In Jiangxi province, during the
war with the KMT, the CCP is known to have conducted internal cleansing
operations, executing its own soldiers—stoning them to death to save bullets. In
Shaanxi province, while sandwiched in between the Japanese and the KMT, the CCP
began the Yan’an rectification movement of mass cleansing, killing many. This
type of repetitive massacre on such a massive scale did not prevent the CCP from
expanding its power to all of China. The CCP imported this pattern of killing
from the Soviet Union.
The CCP is like a malignant tumor: in its rapid development, the center of the
tumor has already died, but it continues to engulf all organisms on the outer
edges, expanding its influence. The organisms and bodies that are engulfed by
the tumor became part of the cancer. No matter how good or bad a person is to
start with, after joining the CCP, he or she would become a part of its
destructive force. The more honest the person is, the more destructive he would
become. Undoubtedly, this CCP tumor will continue to grow until there is nothing
left for it to feed upon. Then, the cancer will surely die.
The founder of the CCP, Chen Duxiu, was an intellectual and a leader of the May
Fourth student movement. He showed himself not a fan of violence, and warned the
CCP members that if they attempted to convert the KMT to the communist
ideologies or had too much interest in power, that would certainly lead to
strained relationships. While one of the most active in the May Fourth
generation, Chen was also tolerant. However, he was the first to be labeled a
“right-wing opportunist.”
Another CCP leader, Qu Qiubai, believed that the CCP members should engage in
battles, organize rebellions, overthrow authorities, and use extreme means to
return the Chinese society to its normal functioning. However, he confessed
before his death that he did not want to die as a revolutionary, since he had
left the movement long time ago. He sighed that history played a trick, bringing
him, an intellectual, onto the political stage of revolution and keeping him
there for many years. In the end, he said he still could not overcome his own
gentry notions. “I cannot become a warrior of the proletariat class.”
The CCP leader Wang Ming, at the advice of the Comintern, advocated for unity
with the KMT in the war against the Japanese, instead of expanding the CCP base.
At the CCP meetings, Mao Zedong and Zhang Wentian could not persuade this fellow
comrade, nor could they reveal the truth of their situation: according to the
limited military strength of the Red Army, they would not be able to hold back
the Japanese by themselves. If, against good sense, the CCP would have decided
to fight, then the history of China would certainly be different. Mao Zedong was
forced to remain silent at the meetings. Later, Wang Ming was ousted, first for
a “left wing” deviation and then branded an opportunist of the right wing
ideology.
Hu Yaobang, another party Secretary, who was forced to resign in January of
1987, fought to bring justice to many innocent victims who had been criminalized
during the Cultural Revolution. He wanted to rejuvenate Communism in the hearts
of the citizens. Still, he was used as a scapegoat in the end.
Zhao Ziyang, the most recent fallen Secretary [21], wanted to help the CCP in
furthering reform, yet his actions brought him dire consequences.
So what has each leader of the CCP accomplished? Truly to reform the CCP would
imply its death. The reformers quickly found their power taken away by the CCP.
There is a certain limit on what the CCP members can do to transform the CCP
system. All rely on the power rendered by the CCP itself, and so no true reform
can succeed with the CCP.
If the Party leaders have all turned into “bad people,” how could the CCP have
expanded the revolution? In many instances when the CCP was at its best—also the
most evil, their highest officials failed in their positions. This was because
their degree of evil did not meet the high standard of the Party, which has,
over and over, selected only the most evil. Many Party leaders ended their
political life in tragedy, yet the CCP has survived. The CCP leaders who
survived their positions were not those who could influence the Party, but those
who could comprehend the Party’s intentions and follow them. They strengthened
the CCP’s ability to survive while in crisis, and gave themselves entirely to
the Party. No wonder they were capable of battling with heaven, fighting with
the earth, and struggling against other human beings. But never could they
oppose the Party. In the CCP organization, especially at the high level, there
was a symbiotic relationship between the leaders and the Party, pursuing their
own mutual survival.
Shamelessness has become a marvelous quality of today’s CCP. According to the
Party, its mistakes were all made by individual Party leaders, e.g., Zhang
Guotao or the Gang of Four [22]. Mao Zedong was judged by the Party as having 3
parts mistakes and 7 parts achievements, while Deng Xiaoping judged himself to
have 4 parts mistakes and 6 parts achievements, but the Party itself was never
wrong. Even if the Party was wrong, it says that it can correct itself.
Therefore, the Party tells its members to “look forward” and “not to be tangled
in past accounts.” Many things could change: The Communist paradise can turn
into a lowly goal of socialist food and shelter; Marx could be replaced with
“Three Represents”; people would not be surprised to see that the country is
becoming democratic, opening up the freedom of belief, abandoning Jiang Zemin
overnight, or redressing the persecution of Falun Gong. Other things about the
CCP, however, do not change: The fundamental pursuit of the Party’s
goals—survival and maintenance of its power and control.
The CCP has mixed violence, terror and high-pressure indoctrination to form its
theoretical basis, which is then turned into the Party nature, the spirit of its
leaders, and ultimately the Party’s entire functioning mechanism and members’
way of acting. The system, its leaders and members all have assimilated to these
ideas. The Communist Party is made of iron and its disciplines have the hardness
of steel. The intention of all its members must be unified, and the action of
all its members must completely comply with the Party’s political agenda.
******************
Conclusion
Why has history chosen the Communist Party over any other political force in
China? As we all know, in this world there are two forces, two choices. One is
the old and evil, whose goal is to do evil and choose the negative. The other is
the righteous and good, which will choose the right and the benevolent. The CCP
was chosen by the old forces. The reason for the choice is precisely because the
CCP has gathered all the evil of the world, Chinese or foreign, past or present.
It is a typical representative of the evil forces. At its inception, the CCP
used people’s inborn innocence and benevolence to cheat, and, step by step, it
has prevailed in gaining today’s capacity to destroy.
What did the Party mean when it claimed that there would be no new China without
the Communist Party? From its founding in 1921 until it took political power in
1949, the evidence clearly shows that without deceit and violence, the CCP would
not be in power. The CCP differs from all other types of organizations in that
it follows a twisted ideology of Marxism-Leninism, and does what it pleases. It
can explain all that it does with high theories and link them cleverly to
certain portions of the masses, thus “justifying” its actions. It broadcasts
propaganda every day, clothing its strategies in various principles and theories
and proving itself to be forever correct.
The development of the CCP has been a process of the accumulation of evil. The
history of the CCP tells us precisely its illegitimacy. The Chinese people did
not choose the CCP; instead, the CCP forced Communism, this foreign evil
specter, onto the Chinese people by applying the evil traits that it has
inherited from the Communist Party—evil, deceit, incitement, unleashing the scum
of society, espionage, robbery, fighting, elimination, and control.
Notes:
[1] From the Communist Anthem, “The Internationale.”
[2] From Mao’s “Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan”
(1927).
[3] Lumpen proletariat, roughly translated as slum workers. This term identifies
the class of outcast, degenerate or underground elements that make up a section
of the population of industrial centers. It includes beggars, prostitutes,
gangsters, racketeers, swindlers, petty criminals, tramps, chronic unemployed or
unemployables, persons who have been cast out by industry, and all sorts of
declassed, degraded or degenerated elements. The term was coined by Marx in The
Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850.
[4] Mao (1927).
[5] Zhou Enlai (March 5, 1898 - January 8, 1976), was second in prominence to
Mao in the history of the CCP. He was a leading figure in the CCP and Premier of
the People's Republic of China from 1949 until his death.
[6] Gu Shunzhang was originally one of the heads of the CCP special agent
system. In 1931 he was arrested by the KMT and assisted them in uncovering many
of the CCP's secret hideouts. All eight members of Gu's family were later
strangled to death and buried in the French Concession in Shanghai. See “The
CCP’s History of Assassinations” for more related information
(http://english.epochtimes.com/news/4-7-14/22421.html).
[7] The war between the CCP and the KMT in June 1946. The war is marked by three
successive campaigns: Liaoxi-Shenyang, Huai-Hai and Beiping-Tianjin, after which
the CCP overthrew the rule of the KMT, leading to the founding of the People's
Republic of China on October 1, 1949.
[8] Chiang Kai-shek was leader of the KMT, and later exiled to become ruler of
Taiwan.
[9] Hu Zongnan (1896-1962), a native of Xiaofeng county (now part of Anji
County), Zhejiang province, was successively deputy commander, acting commander
and chief of staff of the KMT’s Southwest Military and Administrative
Headquarters.
[10] When the CCP began land reform, it categorized the people. Among the
defined classes of enemies, intellectuals are next to landlords, reactionaries,
spies, etc. and ranked Number 9.
[11] From a poem by Sima Qian, a historian and scholar in the West Han Dynasty.
His famous poem says, “Everyone has to die; one dies either more solemn than
Taishan or lighter than a feather.” Taishan is one of the major mountains in
China.
[12] The Northern Expedition was a military campaign led by Chiang Kai-shek in
1927 intended to unify China under the rule of the KMT and end the rule of local
warlords. It was largely successful in these objectives. During the Northern
Expedition, the CCP had an alliance with the KMT.
[13] The revolutionary movement during the CCP-KMT alliance, marked by the
Northern Expedition.
[14] Sun Yat-sen, founder of the modern China.
[15] The National Revolutionary Army controlled by the KMT, was the national
army of the Republic of China. During the period of the CCP-KMT alliance, it
included CCP members who joined the alliance.
[16] On April 12, 1927, the KMT led by Chiang Kai-shek initiated a military
operation against the CCP in Shanghai and several other cities. Over 5,000 to
6,000 of the CCP members were captured and many of them were killed in Shanghai
between April 12 and the end of 1927.
[17] Lin Biao (1907-1971), one of the senior CCP leaders, served under Mao
Zedong as a member of China's Politburo, as Vice-Chairman (1958) and Defense
Minister (1959). Lin is regarded as the architect of China's Great Cultural
Revolution. Lin was designated as Mao's successor in 1966 but fell out of favor
in 1970. Sensing his downfall, Lin reportedly became involved in a coup attempt
and attempted to flee to the USSR once the alleged plot became exposed. During
his attempted flight from prosecution, his plane crashed in Mongolia, resulting
in his death.
[18] Qu Qiubai (1899-1935) is one of the CCP’s earlier leaders and famous
leftist writers. He was captured by KMT on February 23, 1935 and died on June 18
the same year.
[19] The “Three Represents” was initially mentioned in a speech by Jiang Zemin
in February, 2000. According to this doctrine, the Party must always represent
the development trend of China's advanced productive forces, the orientation of
China's advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the overwhelming
majority of the Chinese people.
[20] Pu-yi, Manchurian name Aisin Gioro (1906–1967), the last emperor
(1908–1912) of China, ruled under the name Hsuan T’ung. After his abdication,
the new republican government granted him a large government pension and
permitted him to live in the Forbidden City of Beijing until 1924. After 1925,
he lived in the Japanese concession in Tianjin. In 1934, and, reigning under the
name K’ang Te, he became the emperor of the Japanese puppet state of Manchukuo,
or Manchuria. He was captured by the Russians in 1945 and kept as their
prisoner. In 1946, Pu Yi testified at the Tokyo war crimes trial that he had
been the unwilling tool of the Japanese militarists and not, as they claimed,
the instrument of Manchurian self-determination. In 1950 he was handed over to
the Chinese Communists, and he was imprisoned at Shenyang until 1959, when Mao
Zedong granted him amnesty.
[21] The last of the ten general secretaries of the CCP that was dismissed due
to his disagreement with using force to end the student demonstrations in the
Tiananmen Square in 1989.
[22] The 'Gang of Four' was formed by Mao Zedong's wife Jiang Qing (1913-1991),
Shanghai Propaganda Department official Zhang Chunqiao (1917-1991), literary
critic Yao Wenyuan (1931) and Shanghai security guard Wang Hongwen (1935-1992).
They rose to power during the Great Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) and
dominated Chinese politics during the early 1970s.


Epoch Times Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party - Part 3


The Tyranny of the Chinese Communist Party
Foreword
When thinking of tyranny, most Chinese people recall Qin Shi Huang (259-210
B.C.), the first Emperor of the Qin Dynasty, whose oppressive government burnt
philosophical books and buried Confucian scholars alive. Qin Shi Huang’s harsh
treatment of his people came from his policy of “supporting his rule with all of
the resources under heaven.” [1] This policy had four main aspects: excessively
heavy taxation; wasting human labor for projects to glorify himself; brutal
torture under draconian laws; and controlling people’s minds by blocking all
avenues of free thinking and expression through burning books and even burying
scholars alive. Under the rule of Qin Shi Huang, China had a population of 10
million; the emperor drafted over 2 million to perform forced labor. Qin Shi
Huang brought his draconian laws into the intellectual realm, prohibiting
freedom of thought on a massive scale. During his rule, thousands of Confucian
scholars and officials who criticized the government were killed.
Today the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s violence and abuses are even more
severe than those of the tyrannical Qin Dynasty. Most people know that the CCP’s
philosophy is one of “struggle.” Mao Zedong, the first CCP leader since the
founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), put it bluntly by saying,
“What Qin Shi Huang did was no big deal. He buried 460 intellectuals alive, but
we buried 46,000. There are people who label Qin Shi Huang and us as a
dictatorship, and we accept them all. It’s a fact.” [2]
Let’s take a look at China’s arduous 55 years under the rule of the CCP. As its
founding philosophy is one of “class struggle,” the CCP has spared no efforts
since taking power to commit class genocide, and has achieved its reign of
terror by means of the policy of revolution through violence. Killing and
brainwashing have been used hand in hand to suppress all beliefs differing from
communist theory. The CCP has launched one movement after another to portray
itself as infallible and godlike. Following its policies of class struggle and
violent revolution, the CCP has tried to purge dissidents and opposing social
classes, using violence and tricks to force all Chinese people to become the
obedient servants of its tyrannical rule.
******************
I. Land Reform—Eliminating the Landlord Class
Barely three months after the founding of the communist China, the CCP called
for the elimination of the landlord class as one of the guidelines for its
nationwide land reform program. The party’s slogan “land to the tiller” indulged
the selfish side of the landless farmers, encouraged them to take property by
violence and to disregard the moral implications of their actions; it even
instigated the landless farmers to fight those farmers who owned land. The
campaign, which explicitly stipulated eliminating the landlord class, began with
grouping the rural population into different social categories. Twenty million
rural inhabitants nationwide were labeled as “landlords, rich farmers,
reactionaries, or bad elements.” These new outcasts faced discrimination,
humiliation, and loss of all their civil rights. As the land reform program
extended its reach to remote areas and the villages of ethnic minorities, the
CCP’s organizations also expanded quickly. Party committees and branches spread
all over China and were built at the village and township levels. The local
branches were the mouthpiece for passing instructions from the CCP’s Central
Committee and were at the frontline of the class struggle, inciting farmers to
rise up against their landlords. Nearly 100,000 landlords died during this
movement. In certain areas the CCP and the farmers killed the landlords’ entire
families, disregarding gender or age, as a way to wipe out completely the
landlord class.
In the meantime, the CCP launched its first wave of propaganda, declaring that
“Chairman Mao is the great savior of the people” and that “only the CCP can save
China.” During the land reform, landless farmers got what they wanted with
little effort. Poor farmers credited the CCP for the improvement in their lives
and so accepted the CCP’s propaganda that the party worked for the interests of
the people.
For the owners of the newly acquired land, the good days of “land to the tiller”
were short-lived. Within two years, the CCP imposed a number of practices on the
farmers such as mutual-aid groups, elementary communes, advanced communes, and
people’s communes. Using the slogan of criticizing “women with bound feet”—i.e.,
those who are slow paced—the CCP drove and pushed, year after year, farmers to
“dash” into socialism. With grain, cotton, and cooking oil placed under a
unified purchasing and selling system nationwide, the major agricultural
products were excluded from market exchange. In addition, the CCP established a
residential registration system, barring farmers from going to the cities to
find work or dwell. Those who registered their residence in rural areas were not
allowed to buy grain at state-run stores and their children were prohibited from
receiving education in cities. Farmers’ children could only be farmers, turning
360 million rural residents of the early 1950s into second-class citizens.
Beginning in 1978, in the first five years after moving from a system of
communal living to a household contract system, farmers’ income increased
slightly and their social status improved somewhat. However, such a meager
benefit was soon lost due to corrupt rural officials and a price imbalance
between agricultural and industrial commodities. As a result, today’s 900
million farmers have once again fallen into dire poverty, while the rest of
China has achieved better living standards through the nation’s economic
reforms. The income gap between the urban and rural population has drastically
increased and continues to widen. New landlords and wealthy farmers have emerged
to replace those eliminated in the land reform program. Data provided by the
Xinhua News Agency, a government mouthpiece, indicated that since 1997, “The
income of farmers in the major grain production areas and that of most rural
households have been at a standstill and, in some cases, has experienced a
decline.” The ratio of urban to rural incomes has increased from 1.8 to 1 in the
mid 1980s to 3.1 to 1 today.


******************
II. Reforms in Industry and Commerce—Eliminating the Capitalist Class
The native capitalist class, a class of people who owned capital investments and
resided in cities and towns, was also bound to face destruction during the CCP’s
rule. While reforming China’s industry and commerce, the CCP claimed that the
capitalist class and the working class were different in nature: the former was
the exploiting class while the latter was the non-exploiting class. According to
this logic, the capitalist class was born to exploit and wouldn’t stop doing so
until it perished; it could only be eliminated, not reformed. Under such
premises, the CCP used both killing and brainwashing to transform capitalists
and merchants. Capitalists could thrive if they went along with the government,
but would perish if they didn’t. If you surrendered your assets to the state and
supported the CCP, you were considered just a minor problem among the people.
If, on the other hand, you disagreed with or complained about the CCP’s policy,
you would be labeled as a reactionary and become the target of the CCP’s
draconian dictatorship.
During the reign of terror that ensued during these reforms, capitalists and
business owners all surrendered their assets. Many of them couldn’t bear the
humiliation they faced and committed suicide. Chen Yi, then mayor of Shanghai,
asked every day, “How many paratroopers did we have today?” referring to the
number of capitalists that had committed suicide by jumping from the tops of
buildings that day. This was how the CCP quickly eliminated private ownership in
China.
While carrying out its land and business reform programs, the CCP launched many
massive movements that persecuted the Chinese people. These movements included:
the suppression of “counter-revolutionaries,” ideological remolding campaigns,
cleansing the anti-CCP clique headed by Gao Gang and Rao Shushi, and probing Hu
Feng’s [3] “counter-revolutionary” group. From 1951 to 1952, the CCP initiated
movements called the “Three Anti Campaign" and the "Five Anti Campaign” with the
stated goal of eliminating corruption, waste and bureaucracy within the Party,
government, army and mass organizations. In reality, however, the CCP used these
movements to target and brutally persecute countless innocent people.
Having a full control of government resources, the CCP fully utilized them in
conjunction with the Party’s committees, branches, and sub-branches in every
single political movement. Three party members would form a small struggle
force, infiltrating all villages and neighborhoods. These struggle forces were
ubiquitous, leaving no stone unturned. This deeply-rooted control network,
inherited from the CCP’s years of war with Japan and the Kuomintang (Nationalist
Party, KMT), has since played a key role in later political movements, including
the suppression of its people today.
******************
III. Crackdown on Religions and Popular Groups
Another atrocity the CCP committed is the brutal suppression of religion and
complete ban of all non-governmental groups following the founding of the
People’s Republic of China. In 1950, the CCP instructed its local governments to
ban all unofficial religious faiths and secret societies. The CCP stated that
those “feudalistic” underground groups were mere tools in the hands of
landlords, rich farmers, reactionaries, and the special agents of the KMT,
making them the enemy of the CCP. In this nationwide crackdown, the government
mobilized the classes they trusted to identify and persecute members of
religious groups. Governments at various levels were directly involved in
disbanding such “superstitious groups” as communities of Christians, Catholics,
Taoists, and Buddhists. They ordered all members of these churches, temples, and
religious factions to register with government agencies and to repent for their
unofficial activities. Failure to do so would mean severe punishment. In 1951,
the government formally promulgated regulations threatening that those who
continued their activities in unofficial groups would face a life sentence or a
death penalty.
This movement persecuted a large number of kind-hearted and law-abiding
believers in God. Incomplete statistics indicate that the CCP in the 1950s
persecuted, including death penalty, at least three million religious believers
and underground group members. The CCP searched almost every household across
the nation and interrogated its members, even smashing statues of the Kitchen
God that Chinese farmers traditionally worshipped. The executions reinforced the
CCP’s message that communist ideology was the only legitimate ideology and the
only legitimate faith. The concept of “patriotic” believers soon emerged. The
national constitution protected only “patriotic” believers. The reality was
whatever religion one believed in, there was only one criterion: you had to
follow the CCP’s instructions and you had to acknowledge that the CCP was above
all religions. If you were a Christian, the CCP was the god of the Christian
God. If you were a Buddhist, the CCP was the Master Buddha of the Master Buddha.
Among Muslims, the CCP was the Allah of the Allah. When it came to the Living
Buddha in Tibetan Buddhism, the CCP would intervene and itself choose who the
Living Buddha would be. The bottom line is, the CCP left you no choice but to
say and do what the CCP demanded you to say and do. All believers were forced to
carry out the CCP’s objectives while upholding their respective faiths in name
only. Failing to do so would become the target of the CCP’s crackdown and
dictatorship.
Twenty thousand Christians conducted a survey among 560,000 Christians in house
churches at 207 cities in 22 provinces in China. The survey found that among
house church attendees, 130,000 were under government surveillance. By 1957, the
CCP had killed over 11,000 religious adherents and had arbitrarily arrested and
extorted money from many more. By eliminating the landlord class and the
capitalist class and by persecuting large numbers of God-worshipping and
law-abiding people, the CCP cleared the way for Communism to become the
all-encompassing religion of China.
******************
IV. The Anti-rightist Movement—Nationwide Brainwashing
In 1956, a group of Hungarian intellectuals formed the Petofi Circle, which was
critical of the Hungarian government and participated in forums and debates. The
group sparked a nationwide revolution in Hungary, which was crushed by Soviet
solders. Mao Zedong took this as a lesson. In 1957, Mao called upon the Chinese
intellectuals and other non-communists to “help the CCP rectify itself.” This
movement, known as the “Hundred Flowers Movement” for short, followed the slogan
of “letting a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend.”
His purpose was to lure out “anti-Party elements among people.” In his letter to
provincial Party chiefs in 1957, Mao Zedong spoke his intention of “leading the
snakes out of their holes” by letting them air their views freely in helping the
CCP rectify itself.
Slogans at the time encouraged people to speak up and promised no reprisals—the
Party “won’t pick pigtails, won’t strike with a bat, won’t put on a hat, and
never settle an account afterwards.” [4] Yet later the CCP initiated an
“anti-rightist” movement, declaring 540,000 of the people who dared to speak up
as “rightists.” Among them, 270,000 lost their government jobs and 230,000 were
labeled as “medium rightists” or “anti-socialist elements.” Mao Zedong’s
political tricks in persecuting people included: duping those with dissenting
views into speaking up; fabricating crimes; sentencing people without any due
legal procedure; and claiming to be saving people, while actually relentlessly
attacking people.
What then were the “reactionary words” that had caused so many rightists and
anti-communists to be exiled for nearly 30 years in far-flung corners of the
nation? The “three major reactionary theories,” the targets of general and
intensive assaults at the time, consisted of a few speeches by Luo Longji, Zhang
Bojun, and Chu Anping. A closer look at what they proposed and suggested shows
that their wishes were quite benign.
Luo suggested forming a joint commission of the CCP and various “democratic”
parties to investigate the deviations in the “Three Anti Campaign” and “Five
Anti Campaign”, and the movements for purging reactionaries. The State Council
itself often presented something to the Political Consultative Committee and the
People’s Congress for observations and comments, and Zhang suggested the
Political Consultative Committee and the People’s Congress should be included in
the decision-making process.
Chu suggested that since non-CCP members also had good ideas, self-esteem, and a
sense of responsibility as well, there was no need across the nation to assign a
CCP member as the head of every work unit, big or small, or even for the teams
under each work unit. There was also no need that everything, major or minor,
had to be done the way the CCP members suggested. All three had expressed their
willingness to follow the CCP and none of their suggestions had exceeded the
boundaries demarcated by the famous words of writer and critic Lu Xun
(1881-1936), “My master, your gown has become dirty. Please take it off and I
will wash it for you.” Like Lu Xun, their words expressed docility,
submissiveness and respect.
None of the condemned “rightists” suggested that the CCP should be overthrown;
all they had offered was constructive criticism. Yet precisely because of these
suggestions, tens of thousands of people lost their freedom. What followed were
additional movements such as “confiding to the CCP,” digging out the hardliners,
the movement of the “Three New Anti,” sending intellectuals to the countryside
to do hard labor, and catching the rightists who were missed the first time
around. Whoever had a disagreement with the leader of the workplace would be
labeled as being anti-CCP. The CCP would often subject them to constant
criticism or send them to a labor camp for forced reeducation. Sometimes the
party relocated whole families to rural areas, or barred their children from
going to college or joining the army. They couldn’t apply for jobs in the county
that they lived in. The families would lose their job security and public health
benefits. They had been enrolled in the ranks of farmers and become outcasts
even among second-class citizens.
After the persecution of the intellectuals, some scholars developed a two-faced
personality. They followed closely the “Red Sun” and became the CCP’s
“court-appointed intellectuals,” doing or saying whatever the CCP asked. Some
others just distanced themselves from political matters. Chinese intellectuals,
who are supposed to have a sense of responsibility towards the nation, have been
silenced ever since.
******************
V. The Great Leap Forward – Creating Falsehoods to Test People’s Loyalty
After the Anti-Rightist Movement, China began to fear objective reality.
Everyone was involved in listening to falsehoods, telling falsehoods, making up
false stories, and avoiding and covering up the truth through lies and rumors.
The Great Leap Forward was a nationwide lie-telling exercise. The people of the
entire nation, under the direction of the CCP’s evil specter, did many
ridiculous things. Both liars and those being lied to were betrayed. In this
campaign of lies and ridiculous actions, the CCP implanted its violent, evil
energy into the minds of the intellectuals. At the time, many people sang the
song promoting the Great Leap Forward, “I am the Great Jade Emperor, I am the
Dragon King, I can move the mountains and rivers, here I come.” Policies such as
“achieving a grain production throughout of 75,000 kg per hectare,” “doubling
steel production,” and “surpassing Britain in 10 years and the US in 15 years”
were carried out year after year. These policies resulted in a great, nationwide
famine that cost millions of lives.
During the Lushan Plenum in 1959, all the participants felt that General Peng
Dehuai’s [5] opinion was correct and that the Great Leap Forward initiated by
Mao Zedong was foolish. However, no one dared to say anything. The decision to
support Mao’s policy or not marked the line between being loyal or a traitor, in
other words, the line between life and death. In ancient history, when Zhao Gao
[6] claimed that a deer was a horse, he knew the difference between a deer and a
horse, but he made the mistake purposefully to test and control public opinion.
The result of the Lushan Plenum was that even Peng Dehuai was forced to sign a
resolution condemning and purging himself from the central government.
Similarly, in the later years of Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping was forced
to guarantee that he would never appeal against the government’s decision to
remove him from his posts.
People normally learn from past lessons and experiences. However, the CCP has
censored the media, keeping people from having the chance to learn lessons from
the Chinese government’s policy mistakes. This has affected people’s minds,
diminishing their ability to think critically. During past movements, each
generation heard only the Party’s point of view and had no idea about opposing
schools of thought. As a result, new movements were judged based on a very
limited knowledge of history. The CCP has relied on censorship to keep people
ignorant so as to carry out its often violent ideology.
******************
VI. The Cultural Revolution – Turning the World Upside Down
One cannot discuss the possession of China by the evil specter of the CCP
without bringing up the Great Cultural Revolution. In 1966, a new wave of
violence occurred in China; the red terror ran out of control and covered every
corner of the country. Writer Qin Mu described the Cultural Revolution in bleak
terms:
It was truly an unmitigated disaster: [the CCP] imprisoned millions due to their
association with a [targeted] family member, ended the lives of millions more,
shattered families, turned children into hoodlums and villains, burned books,
tore down ancient buildings, and destroyed ancient intellectuals’ gravesites,
committing all kinds of crimes in the name of revolution.
Conservative figures place the number of unnatural deaths in China during the
Cultural Revolution at 7.73 million.
People often mistakenly think that the violence and slaughter during the Great
Cultural Revolution happened mostly during the rebel movements, and that it was
the Red Guards and Rebels who committed the slaughter. However, thousands of
officially published Chinese county annuals indicate that the peak of unnatural
deaths during the Cultural Revolution was not in 1966, when the Red Guards
controlled most of the government organizations, or in 1967 when the Rebels
fought among different groups with military weapons, but rather in 1968 when Mao
regained control over the country through levels of “revolutionary committees.”
The murderers in those infamous cases were often army officers and soldiers,
armed militiamen, and CCP members at all levels of the government.
The following examples illustrate how the violence during the Cultural
Revolution was the policy of the CCP and the Chinese government, not the
irregular, extreme behavior of the Red Guards. The CCP has covered up its own
direct involvement in the campaign and the instructions given by party leaders
and government officials.
In August of 1966, the Red Guards expelled Beijing residents who had been
classified in past movements as “landlords, wealthy farmers, reactionaries, bad
elements, and rightists” out of the city into the countryside. Incomplete
official statistics showed that 33,695 homes were searched and 85,196 Beijing
residents were expelled from the city to the countryside where their older
generations had originally come from. Red Guards all over the country carried
out this policy, expelling over 400,000 urban residents to the countryside. Even
high-ranking officials whose parents were landlords faced exile to the country.
Actually, the CCP planned the expulsion campaign even before the Cultural
Revolution began. Former Beijing mayor Peng Zhen declared that the residents of
Beijing city should be as ideologically pure as “glass panels and crystals,”
meaning that all residents with a bad political classification (that is, they or
their parents were labeled as “landlords, wealthy farmers, reactionaries, bad
elements, and rightists”) would be expelled out of the city. In May of 1966, Mao
commanded his subordinates to “protect the capital” and to set up a capital
working team, led by Ye Jianying, Yang Chengwu and Xie Fuzhi. One of the tasks
of this team was to use the police to expel Beijing residents with a bad
political classification.
This background helps make clear why the government and police departments did
not intervene but rather supported the Red Guards in searching homes and
expelling more than two percent of Beijing residents. The Minister of Public
Security, Xie Fuzhi, required the police not to intervene in the Red Guards’
actions but rather to provide advice and information to them. The Red Guards
were simply utilized by the party to carry out a planned action. The Red Guard
organizations were set up under the direct instruction of some party leaders.
Many notices issued by the Red Guards were revised and published by the State
Council. However, despite the previous support for the Red Guards, at the end of
1966 the CCP labeled many of them as counterrevolutionaries and imprisoned them.

Following the removal of the Beijing residents with a bad political
classification to the countryside, these individuals then faced increasing
persecution in the countryside. On August 26, 1966, a speech of Xie Fuzhi was
passed down to the Daxing Police Bureau. Xie ordered the police to assist the
Red Guards in the searching homes of the “five black classes” by providing
advice and information and helping in their raids.
The infamous Daxing Massacre [7] started directly from the instructions of the
police department; organizers were the director and the CCP secretary of the
police department, and the killers were mostly militiamen who did not even spare
the children.
Many were admitted into the CCP for their “good behavior” during the slaughter.
According to incomplete statistics for Guangxi province, about 50,000 CCP
members were involved in the slaughter. Among them more than 9,000 were admitted
into the Party within a short period of time after killing someone. More than
20,000 committed murder after being admitted into the Party, and more than
19,000 other Party members were related to killing one way or another.
During the Great Cultural Revolution, class theory would also be applied to
beatings. The bad deserved it if they were beaten by the good. It was honorable
for a bad person to beat another bad. It was a misunderstanding if a good person
beat another good person. Such a theory invented by Mao was spread widely in the
rebel movements. Violence and slaughter were widespread as a result of thinking
that the enemies of the class struggle deserved any violence against them.
From August 13 to October 7 of 1967, militiamen in Dao county of Hunan province
slaughtered members of the “Xiangjiang Wind and Thunder” organization and “five
black classes.” The slaughter lasted 66 days; more than 4,519 people in 2,778
households were killed in 468 divisions of 36 people’s communes in 10 districts.
A total of 9,093 people were killed in the area, of which 38% were of the “five
black classes” and 44% were the children of the “five black classes.” The oldest
person killed was 78 years old, and the youngest was only 10 days old.
This is only one case in one small area during the Cultural Revolution. In Inner
Mongolia, after the establishment of the “revolutionary committee” in early
1968, a class-purging movement against the “Inner People’s Party” killed more
than 350,000 people. In 1968, tens of thousands of people in Guangxi province
participated in the mass slaughtering of the “422 organization,” killing more
than 110,000.
These cases point out that those major acts of violent killing during the
Cultural Revolution were all under the direct instigation and instruction of CCP
leaders who utilized and allowed violence to persecute and kill citizens.
If during the Land Reform the CCP used peasants to overthrow landlords to obtain
land, during the Industrial and Commercial Reform the CCP used the working class
to overthrow capitalists to gain assets, and during the Anti-Rightists Movement
the CCP eliminated all intellectuals who held opposing opinions, then this kind
of fighting amongst the people during the Cultural

(Message over 64k, truncated.)
Forward
Message #92 of 809 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

******** S.O.S. ********** As this is a serious problem against humanity, I would like to write to bring your awareness. I apologize for any inconvinience....
leshydonlop@...
Send Email
Nov 23, 2006
4:56 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help