Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
tuning · Welcome to the Alternate Tunings Mailing List.

Group Information

  • Members: 1462
  • Category: Education
  • Founded: Dec 28, 1998
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Carl Lumma's 7-limit, 6 tetrads + 4 triads within 2c of Just   Message List  
Reply Message #1012 of 104655 |
This follows from the thread "Re: 225:224".

Carl Lumma <clumma@...> wrote:

>Does anybody know the best 5-limit shape for taking advantage of the
>225:224 at the 7-limit? When looking for the best 7-limit shape to take
>advantage of the comma in the 5-limit, I came up with...
>
> /
> /
> 5/3--------5/4......28/15-----
> /|\ / |. / \
> / | \ / | . / \
> / 7/6--------7/4 . /
> / // \\ \ / / / . /
> 4/3-/---\-1/1../...112/75----
> /|\/ \/| /
> / |/\ /\| /
> /28/15------7/5
> / // \\ \ / //
> 16/15/---\-8/5 /
> | / \ | /
> |/ \|/
> 112/75-----28/25
>
>
>...can anyone find a better one that's still reasonable as a scale?

Paul H. Erlich" <PErlich@...> replied:

>You mean among 12-tone scales, right? I see 6 consonant tetrads here
>(you didn't even show one of them). That's pretty impressive! I don't
>think that can be beat. Why not use 72-tET and reduce the maximum error
>from almost 8 cents to under 3 cents?

Yes. There are 6 tetrads plus 4 triads. I'm pretty sure it can't be beat (pun
intended) too. I did some serious searching by considering the 225/128 (~= 7/4)
as a bridge on a 5-limit lattice (easier to think and draw in 2D). The best one
I can find is

75/64----225/128
. / \ . /
. / \. u /
. / . .\ /
. /. . \ /
5/3-------5/4------15/8------45/32
/ \ . / \ . ./ \ /
/ \. / \. u / \ u /
/ o \ / o .\ / .\ /
/ \ /. . \ / . \ /
4/3-------1/1-------3/2-------9/8
/ \ . ./ .
/ \. . / .
/ o .\ / .
/ . \ / .
16/15------8/5

Which, when the septimal kleismas (225/224) disappear, is entirely equivalent to
your (Carl's) 7-limit lattice above. Is this what Terry Riley uses on "The Harp
of New Albion"?

It can be notated as
D# ------ A#
. / \ . /
. / \. u /
. / . .\ /
. /. . \ /
A ------- E ------- B ------- F#
/ \ . / \ . ./ \ /
/ \. / \. u / \ u /
/ o \ / o .\ / .\ /
/ \ /. . \ / . \ /
F ------- C ------- G ------- D
/ \ . ./ .
/ \. . / .
/ o .\ / .
/ . \ / .
Db------- Ab

and we see that it agrees with meantone spelling where the 7:4 is an augmented
sixth, e.g. C-A#. It also contains a diatonic scale.

I agree with Paul that one should distribute the septimal kleisma over the
intervals involved. But forcing the scale to be a mode of such a large ET (72)
seems of minor value (although it is only 1c worse than optimum). Minimum errors
are obtained when the 7:4's and 5:3's are just. In this case all the other
7-limit intervals have only a quarter kleisma (1.93 cent) error. Wow! Do you
agree that this seriously blurrs the distinction between JI and temperaments?

Note that there are 4 wolves in three different sizes. D-A is a comma-narrow
wolf (-21.5c). If this were optimally tempered as well (to give two more
triads), we'd be in 1/4-comma meantone, the max error would go up to 5.4 cents,
and I've just described the 7-limit 12-of-meantone scale with which I joined
this list last October. :-)

Carl's scale (with kleisma distributed) has 3 step sizes (as does my "strange"
9-limit temperament) of approximately 69, 84 and 116 cents.

The next best 12-tone scale I could find, having no comma steps ("reasonable as
a scale"), also has 6 tetrads. But it only has 2 additional triads (not 4). It
has 5 wolves (not 4) and no diatonic scale. Its 5-limit lattice looks like:
Cx
G#D#A#
A E B F#
F C G
Db

Unless Terry Riley can claim priority, here's a proposed Scala archive entry:

! lumma.scl
!
Carl Lumma, 7-limit, 6 tetrads + 4 triads within 2c of Just, TL 19-2-99
12
! 5-limit 7-limit
115.5870 ! 16/15 +3.9c, 15/14 -3.9c
200.0542 ! 9/8 +3.9c, 28/25 -3.9c
268.7988 ! 75/64 -5.8c, 7/6 +1.9c
384.3858 ! 5/4 -1.9c, 56/45 +5.8c
499.9729 ! 4/3 +1.9c 75/56 -5.8c
584.4401 ! 45/32 -5.8c 7/5 +1.9c
700.0271 ! 3/2 -1.9c, 112/75 +5.8c
815.6142 ! 8/5 +1.9c, 45/28 -5.8c
5/3 ! 884.3587c, 224/135+7.7c
7/4 !225/128-7.7c, 968.8259c
1084.4130! 15/8 -3.9c, 28/15 +3.9c
2/1

Talk about JI-meets-12-tET! Notice that 2 of the scale degrees are given as
exact ratios, while 3 others are essentially the same as they are in 12-tET.

Here are offsets from 12-tET:
C 0.0
Db 15.6
D 0.1
D# -31.2
E -15.6
F 0.0
F# -15.6
G 0.0
Ab 15.6
A -15.6
A# -31.2
B -15.6

This scale can of course be considered 9-limit with a max error of 3.9c. 4 of
the 6 tetrads extend to pentads. That's 4-pentads + 2 tetrads + 4 triads.
Beautiful!

This effectively unifies a bunch of 12-tone 5 and 7 limit-scales. Why would
anyone bother with those scales now? Fokker's was the only such scale I could
find in the Scala archive, but there are several others that would be unified,
but for one note (handblue, gamelan-om, just7_12).

People refer to 1/4-comma meantone as quasi-just. What should we call *this*?
wafso-just? (within a fly excrement of)

This is great Carl!

Regards,
-- Dave Keenan
http://uq.net.au/~zzdkeena





Thu Feb 25, 1999 8:09 am

d.keenan@xx.xxx.xxx
Send Email Send Email

Message #1012 of 104655 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

This follows from the thread "Re: 225:224". ... Yes. There are 6 tetrads plus 4 triads. I'm pretty sure it can't be beat (pun intended) too. I did some serious...
Dave Keenan
d.keenan@xx.xxx.xxx Send Email
Feb 25, 1999
8:09 am

... I thought the lattice diagram looked rather familiar. As I've mentioned before, that scale is not all that different from some of the scales I came up...
Paul Hahn
Paul-Hahn@xxxxxxx.xxx... Send Email
Feb 25, 1999
4:39 pm

... I guess the question is: Was Carl the first to describe this scale as being that comma-free 12-of-7-limit-just scale that has the greatest harmonic...
Dave Keenan
d.keenan@... Send Email
Mar 1, 1999
10:58 am

... Try the list archives from last August. --pH <manynote@...> http://library.wustl.edu/~manynote O /\ "Well, so far, every time I break...
Paul Hahn
Paul-Hahn@xxxxxxx.xxx... Send Email
Mar 1, 1999
3:49 pm

In the light of the concurrent Fokker thread (Thanks Paul Erlich and Joe Monzo) it seems likely that Adriaan Fokker (sort of) beat us to it by about 60 years....
Dave Keenan
d.keenan@xx.xxx.xxx Send Email
Mar 2, 1999
1:04 am

Dave Keenan wrote, ... approximated by each degree. Choose almost >any ratio for any degree and you'll have a Just scale which, when its kleismas are...
Paul H. Erlich
PErlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx... Send Email
Mar 2, 1999
6:16 am

I (Dave Keenan) wrote, ... I'm sorry. I assumed you had access to Manuel's archive. ftp://ella.mills.edu/ccm/tuning/software/scales/scales.zip (645K) Here are...
Dave Keenan
d.keenan@xx.xxx.xxx Send Email
Mar 5, 1999
3:56 am

[Keenan:] ... And instead you got me. ... And I agree. - Monzo ___________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy...
Joseph L Monzo
monz@xxxx.xxxx Send Email
Mar 6, 1999
12:30 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help