How Government Agents Neutralize Liberty Activism
COINTELPRO
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/05/cointelpro.html
A guide to dealing with government shills in the freedom movement, and the
common strategies of infiltration.  How Government agents distract human rights
activists from defending freedom.



The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. COINTELPRO is an acronym for
Counter Intelligence program. Google the term COINTELPRO and you will find
hundreds of web pages from all different types of political perspectives.
 

Here is one recommended site:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
Liberty activists made a serious mistake by ignoring the creation of COINTELPRO,
and by not resisting the illegal and treacherous tactics that were used. Even
before 911 it was possible to convince people that our security required that we
allow the FBI to "cut corners" for the "good of America".  At that time the
FBI seemed to be defending liberty rather than suppressing dissent. While
COINTELPRO was allegedly terminated in 1971, FOIA requests have shown that
COINTELPRO still exists, and is even more aggressive that ever.  At one time
COINTELPRO was only used against those who worked for tyranny.

To Stand Alone: Inside the KKK for the FBI (Paperback) by Delmar Dennis
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/092559105X?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jpe\
rna12

What was originally an illegal wire tapping is now condoned.
Update: FISA warrantless wiretapping Bill (HR 6304)
To sit in on an actual government training class on oppression of patriots,
click any of these:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/03/fedsslanderchristiansandp\
atriots.html 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XC1fk_EO3c 
 
(Click the rectangle in the lower right to go to full screen)
http://www.24hourforums.com/view_topic.php?id=25587&forum_id=109&jump_to=252929
http://tinyurl.com/bj3qey
We now have secret police, regular troopers and federal authorities targeting
people who support the constitution that they swore an oath to uphold and
protect.
Brutality against those who exercise constitutional rights is becoming very
common:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/04/arizona-storm-trooper-.ht\
ml 
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/04/baptist-pastor-beaten-and\
-tazed-.html
If you will study nothing more than the old tactics used by the original FBI
COINTELPRO program, you will immediately recognize the same pattern that is now
being used by the new DHS COINTELPRO.

DHS report on 'right-wing extremism'
http://www.onenewsnow.com:80/Politics/Default.aspx?id=490506


The FBI Pyramid From the Inside (Hardcover) by W. Mark Felt and Ralph De
Toledano
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001P8K812?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jpe\
rna12

What was originally called a burglary is now called a "sneak and peek search".
Visit:
 
http://bcn.boulder.co.us/environment/vail/ifanagentknocks.html
 
Take note of the following paragraph:
 
"The FBI COINTELPRO program was initiated in 1956. Its purpose, as
described later by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, was "to expose, disrupt,
misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" of those
individuals and organizations whose ideas or goals he opposed. Tactics
included: falsely labeling individuals as informants; infiltrating groups
with persons instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged
letters designed to promote strife between groups; initiating politically
motivated IRS investigations; carrying out burglaries of offices and
unlawful wiretaps; and disseminating to other government agencies and to
the media unlawfully obtained derogatory information on individuals and
groups."
 
If you understand the meaning of the tactic "to expose, disrupt, misdirect,
discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities" you will understand that the
person who is most likely of being a Fed, is the one who involves human rights
activists in activities that have no effect on those who are building tyranny,
and activities that will destroy the credibility of the human rights activists.
 
Misdirecting activities involves the goal of actually taking over the
leadership. Taking over the leadership is the highest priority.  Beware of new
comers who volunteer to lead. Also understand that often those, who are working
for intelligence agencies, do not even know who it is, for whom they are
working. Disrupting only becomes the goal when there is a failure to take over
the leadership. These two goals are summarized as "rule or ruin".
 
Misdirecting activities is a fairly simple thing in organizations that put their
agenda up for a vote. Infiltrators simply present alternative agendas until they
have the organization bogged down with foolishness.
By law, political parties, and political candidates, are regulated by the
Federal Election Commission. Political parties operate according to
parliamentary procedure; and therefore do not have a fixed body of principles.
Political party platforms come up for a VOTE.

 
Federal Election Commission (which means the whole federal government) has
access to everything that we do INSIDE OF A PARTY, and they dictate how we will
do it. Political parties are an easy target for control by government shills,
and most of the government shills will have extensive experience working
inside of a political party.


Unlimited Access- an FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House (Hardcover) by
Gary Aldrich
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000IXBANK?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jpe\
rna12 

Imagine two armies facing each other: One is commanded by a General; the other
is run by a steering committee.
In the army is that is commanded by a General, the General gives the order to
CHARGE, AND THE ARMY GOES INTO A CHARGE.
In the army that is run by a steering committee, the Chairman of the steering
committee says "I move that we load our weapons, Is there a second to that
motion?"  
Everyone except one infiltrator says "I second that motion!"
The Chairman of the steering committee says "Is there any discussion?"
Everyone except one infiltrator says "Sir, we had better start shooting back. At
the rate that they are killing us, very soon we will not have a quorum!"
The one infiltrator says "Point of order sir: We cannot vote on a motion
to start shooting back, while we still have a motion on the floor to load our
weapons."
WHO WOULD WIN THAT BATTLE?
 
If an organization does not operate according to parliamentary procedure the
infiltrators will attempt to change that. If the leadership understands this
tactic they will decline to make this change. The infiltrator will then move on
to creating dissension among the members over this, and over any other issue
that they can raise.
 
Misdirecting activities by presenting alternative agendas usually involves
promoting hoaxes. Those who are building tyranny would love to convince people
that we are all
a bunch of paranoid nuts, so that we will we unable to warn people about the
building of tyranny. Those who are building tyranny would be more capable of
convincing people that we are paranoid nuts, if they could convince a segment of
the human rights activists to run around telling people that the clouds, and the
street signs, are out to get us.
 
Effective organizations have a fixed permanent agenda. Members vote for that
agenda by joining the group. Anyone who wishes to vote against that agenda does
so by leaving the group.  
 
If you understand the meaning of the tactic "infiltrating groups with persons
instructed to disrupt the group; sending anonymous or forged letters designed to
promote strife between groups" THEN you will know that a myriad of personal
attacks and whisper campaigns is a part of the COINTELPRO program. Only the
accusation that cannot withstand a demand for evidence will be whispered behind
the back of the accused.
 
Often an article such as this is an effective way of "smoking out" the
government shill. If there is a government shill reading this we invite you to
identify yourself with your usual tactics of ridicule, innuendo, and personal
attacks.
 
Those who would like to identify government shills might want to take note of
who it is who objects to the distribution of this article.  It would be safe to
conclude that if one were to throw a rock into a pen full of pigs, and one of
them squealed, that the one that had squealed, would be the one that you had
hit. No one's name is mentioned here, but sometimes there will be someone
who will claim that this is an accurate description of themselves. In that case
we might agree with them.

More detail on TACTICS

Creating Strife Among Human Rights Activists
 
It is VERY simple: Those who spend their time fighting tyranny, are human rights
activists. Those who spend their time fighting human rights activists are
working for the advancement of tyranny. We learn who the most effective human
rights activists are, by seeing who the government shills attack. We learn who
the government shills are, by seeing who attacks the most effective human rights
activists. This would be a consistently reliable way of identifying government
shills except for the fact that   government shills are incredibly clever
at deceiving others into doing their dirty work.
 
After the initiation of hostility the infiltrator expects one of two reactions:
1) Appeasement
or
2) Resistance
 
Appeasement leads to the accomplishment of the primary objective of taking
control.
 
Resistance leads to the accomplishment of the secondary objective of creating
strife.
 
The only effective response to the initiation of hostility is to restructure all
activities so as to avoid the person who is creating the strife. SWAT THE FLY,
AND MOVE ON.
Ignore the initiation of strife, and go back to defending liberty.
 

Deceiving Human Rights Activists into Supporting Hoaxes
 
We can defend freedom, or we can fall for hoaxes. We cannot do both.

There is a presence, in the freedom movement, of persons who attempt to distract
human rights activists away from defending liberty, by seducing them into all
sorts of silly programs; which would ultimately waste resources, make them
appear to be foolish,
and cause them to lose credibility.
 
This includes claims that the vapor trails; that jets always leave, are a plot
to poison us.
This includes claims that the stickers, placed on the back of road signs by
manufacturers, are some sort of trail blazing for a future enemy army.
This even includes a propaganda blitz to BAN WATER, by using its scary sounding
chemical name: Dihydrogen Monoxide
Very few people will actually fall for the "tin foil hat" hoax, but this is used
as a "straw man" fallacy to ridicule those who expose the real dangers to
liberty.  

Deceiving Human Rights Activists into Creating Class Struggle
by Promoting Ethnic Hatred.


The conspiracy, that we fight, is NOT a group of religious people. They believe
in NOTHING else except power, and money, for themselves. The theory that they
work for the benefit of a religion, or a nation, or a race, ascribes to them a
self sacrificing characteristic; which they do not have. When they are in power,
they persecute religious people of all faiths. Neither virtue nor sin is
hereditary. There are good and bad in all kinds. 


The problem is, that in order to have credibility you MUST be consistently
right. Slanting everything so that it always comes up ethnic, just discredits
the rest of your information. If there is one cockroach in the sugar bowl most
people will throw out the whole bowl of sugar.

There are people of all ethnicities who want to be free, and are working to
oppose tyranny. There are people of all ethnicities who want to be dictators,
and are working to oppose freedom.



Mark 3 :        King James Version (KJV)
24 And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
25 And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.
 
Quo Bono? Who benefits when patriotism is perverted into hatred of minorities?
The effect is to neutralize patriotic enthusiasm by turning it into hatred of
other victims of tyranny. How does that effect the defense of liberty? The
conspirators who would destroy liberty actually "kill two birds with one
stone" by fueling such disinformation:

    1. The OBVIOUS effect is to dispense with the opposition to tyranny, by
diverting the efforts of the patriots toward a "decoy". If the disinformation is
successful, the person who would have ordinarily been opposing real criminal
conspirators, now makes himself busy, trying to destroy the life of some little
cobbler, or tailor, or of some innocent children at play.
    2. Perhaps an even more important function is the creation of class
struggle. When a nation goes to war against ITSELF anyone can take it over. One
expert on this sort of attack, Mao Tse Dung, summed it up quite well: "The
stronghold is broken easily from the INSIDE". Divide and conquer is a VERY OLD
trick.  "If your enemy is stronger divide him." -Sun Tzu
For details about this strategy, read the Communist Manifesto
























Attempting to Waste the Time of Human Rights Activists
The primary methods for wasting the time of human rights activists is by forcing
them to respond to personal attacks, whisper campaigns, and by endless debate
about trivia or hoaxes.
Endless debate about trivia or hoaxes is extremely easy to accomplish in
organizations  which vote on their agenda. Wasting the time of human rights
activists is often accomplished automatically by the pursuit of the other goals
that are discussed above as described by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover: "to
expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize activities".
The only solution is to just set the distractions of infiltrators aside, and go
back to work opposing tyranny. In this way neutralizers do not waste the time of
freedom activists. Just dispense with them, with a standard response. Reviewing
this article is an effective standard response. Understanding who is really
doing this will help immensely:


None Dare Call It Conspiracy (Paperback) by Gary Allen
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0945001290?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jpe\
rna12

The Unseen Hand (Paperback) by A. Ralph Epperson

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0961413506?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jpe\
rna12 






 



Visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty

CLICK HERE:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/ 

1. Links to liberty defending organizations
2. Links to liberty defending web pages
3. Links to A MASSIVE assortment of liberty defending videos
4. A stream lined system for contacting legislators with suggested letters
5. Links to liberty defending egroups
6. Links to magazines, literature and other materials
 

Are you looking for a book about defending liberty?
Many rare and out of print books are still available.
Look here:
http://www.amazon.com/shops/jperna12
 

Censorship of these kind of links is rampant. Adding spaces is the usual method.
If the link is not clickable try pasting it into the address bar.
Remove extra spaces if need be.  
Or try clicking on the link as it appears in the blog at:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/ 

Surf the REST of the blog while you are there.
 

IF CENSORSHIP OCCURS THE CREDIBILITY OF THE MESSAGE IS AFFIRMED. WOULD
GOVERNMENT TRY TO STIFLE A MESSAGE THAT IS NOT EXPOSING THE TRUTH?
Oppression of expression is confession
 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]